This document provides details of the analysis and design of a flat slab foundation according to BS8110:Part 1:1997. It includes the slab geometry, material properties, loading details, and calculations for the design of reinforcement in the sagging and hogging bending moments for internal and edge spans in the x-direction. Reinforcement areas are calculated and reinforcement arrangements are selected to satisfy design requirements. Deflection checks are also performed.
02-Structural General Layout (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)Hossam Shafiq II
The document discusses the structural system of a typical steel industrial structure. It includes main trusses that are repeated every 6 meters to form the structural framework. Purlins connect the trusses and support steel sheets on the roof. Main beams run between main frames every 6 meters to provide additional support. Horizontal and vertical bracings are placed at intervals to brace the structural system.
The document provides details on the design of a reinforced concrete column footing to support a column load of 1100kN from a 400mm square column. It describes the design process which includes determining the footing size, calculating bending moment, reinforcement requirements, checking shear capacity and development length. The design example shows a 3.5m x 3.5m square footing with 12mm diameter bars at 100mm c/c is adequate to support the given load based on the specified material properties and design codes. Reinforcement and footing details are also provided.
This document describes the design of a pile cap by a group of civil engineering students. It defines a pile cap as a concrete mat that rests on piles driven into soft ground to provide a stable foundation. It then provides two examples of pile cap design, showing dimensions, load calculations, reinforcement requirements and construction details. The document concludes that a pile cap distributes a building's load to piles to form a stable foundation on unstable soil. It acknowledges the guidance of professors in completing this project.
Priliminary design of column
before going to give properties to the structure in the staad pro preliminary design have to be done to find out the dimensions of column
This document discusses the design of an isolated column footing, including:
1) Types of isolated column footings and factors that influence footing size like bearing capacity of soil.
2) Key sections to check for bending moment, shear, and development length.
3) Reinforcement requirements.
4) An example problem where a rectangular isolated sloped footing is designed for a column carrying an axial load of 2000 kN. Design checks are performed for footing size, bending moment, shear, development length, and reinforcement.
This document provides methods for designing reinforced concrete slabs using working stress design and ultimate strength design. It discusses one-way and two-way slab design, including defining characteristics, load calculations, moment calculations, depth checks, and steel calculations. Formulas are provided for slab thickness selection, elastic constant calculation, load calculations considering dead and live loads, moment determination using code coefficients, minimum steel requirements, and distribution steel spacing.
The document provides details about the construction of the CC-27 metro corridor project in Delhi. It discusses the proposed route, construction methods used at different stations, specifications of materials like concrete mixes, and repair works. The bottom-up construction approach is used at Vasant Vihar due to hard rock, while soft soil at Hauz Khas uses a top-down method. Waterproofing involves applying a two-component polyurethane coating after priming and adding aggregates to the primer layer.
02-Structural General Layout (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)Hossam Shafiq II
The document discusses the structural system of a typical steel industrial structure. It includes main trusses that are repeated every 6 meters to form the structural framework. Purlins connect the trusses and support steel sheets on the roof. Main beams run between main frames every 6 meters to provide additional support. Horizontal and vertical bracings are placed at intervals to brace the structural system.
The document provides details on the design of a reinforced concrete column footing to support a column load of 1100kN from a 400mm square column. It describes the design process which includes determining the footing size, calculating bending moment, reinforcement requirements, checking shear capacity and development length. The design example shows a 3.5m x 3.5m square footing with 12mm diameter bars at 100mm c/c is adequate to support the given load based on the specified material properties and design codes. Reinforcement and footing details are also provided.
This document describes the design of a pile cap by a group of civil engineering students. It defines a pile cap as a concrete mat that rests on piles driven into soft ground to provide a stable foundation. It then provides two examples of pile cap design, showing dimensions, load calculations, reinforcement requirements and construction details. The document concludes that a pile cap distributes a building's load to piles to form a stable foundation on unstable soil. It acknowledges the guidance of professors in completing this project.
Priliminary design of column
before going to give properties to the structure in the staad pro preliminary design have to be done to find out the dimensions of column
This document discusses the design of an isolated column footing, including:
1) Types of isolated column footings and factors that influence footing size like bearing capacity of soil.
2) Key sections to check for bending moment, shear, and development length.
3) Reinforcement requirements.
4) An example problem where a rectangular isolated sloped footing is designed for a column carrying an axial load of 2000 kN. Design checks are performed for footing size, bending moment, shear, development length, and reinforcement.
This document provides methods for designing reinforced concrete slabs using working stress design and ultimate strength design. It discusses one-way and two-way slab design, including defining characteristics, load calculations, moment calculations, depth checks, and steel calculations. Formulas are provided for slab thickness selection, elastic constant calculation, load calculations considering dead and live loads, moment determination using code coefficients, minimum steel requirements, and distribution steel spacing.
The document provides details about the construction of the CC-27 metro corridor project in Delhi. It discusses the proposed route, construction methods used at different stations, specifications of materials like concrete mixes, and repair works. The bottom-up construction approach is used at Vasant Vihar due to hard rock, while soft soil at Hauz Khas uses a top-down method. Waterproofing involves applying a two-component polyurethane coating after priming and adding aggregates to the primer layer.
This document discusses a beam deflection drawing assignment completed by student Batool Alshamali with student ID 2013001217 for Dr. Rajai Z. Alrousan's structure analysis course. The assignment involved analyzing beam deflection using a drawing.
This document provides an overview of the design process for reinforced concrete beams. It begins by outlining the basic steps, which include assuming section sizes and materials, calculating loads, checking moments, and sizing reinforcement. It then describes the types of beams as singly or doubly reinforced. Design considerations like the neutral axis and types of sections - balanced, under-reinforced, and over-reinforced - are explained. The detailed 10-step design procedure is then outlined, covering calculations for dimensions, reinforcement for bending and shear, serviceability checks, and providing design details.
- The document discusses the design of a combined footing to support two columns carrying loads of 700 kN and 1000 kN respectively.
- A trapezoidal combined footing of size 7.2m x 2m is designed to support the loads and transmit them uniformly to the soil.
- Longitudinal and transverse reinforcement is designed for the footing and a central beam is included to join the two columns. Detailed design calculations and drawings of the footing and beam are presented.
This resource material is exclusively for the purpose of knowledge dissemination for the use of Civil engineering Fraternity, professionals & students.
This file contains state of art techniques adopted & practiced as per IS456 code provisions for analysis design & detailing of flat slab structural systems.
The presentation aims to provide clear,concise, technical details of flat slabs design.
The presentation deals with structural actions & behavior of flat slabs with visual representations obtained through finite element analysis.
The knowledge gained can be used for designing building structures frequently encountered in construction.
The presentation covers an important feature of slab systems supported on rigid & flexible support & clearly demarcates the minimum beam dimensions required to consider the supports to be either rigid or flexible.
The presentation alsoincludes clear technical drawings to highlight the importance of detailing w.r.t. rebar lay out - positioning & curtailment. Typical section drawing through middle & column strips are also included for visualizing rebar patterns in 3 -d views.
This presentation is an outcome of series of lectures for undergrad & grad students studying in civil engineering.
My next presentation would be on Analysis & design of deep beams.
Kindly mail me ( vvietcivil@gmail.com) your questions & valuable feedback.
1) Two-way slabs are slabs that require reinforcement in two directions because bending occurs in both the longitudinal and transverse directions when the ratio of longest span to shortest span is less than 2.
2) The document discusses various types of two-way slabs and design methods, focusing on the direct design method (DDM).
3) Using the DDM, the total factored load is first calculated, then the total factored moment is distributed to positive and negative moments. The moments are further distributed to column and middle strips using factors that consider the slab and beam properties.
The document describes the design of a stepped footing to support a column with an unfactored load of 800 kN. A square footing with dimensions of 2.1m x 2.1m is designed with two 300mm steps. Reinforcement of #12 bars at 150mm c/c is provided. Checks are performed for bending moment, one-way shear, two-way shear, and development length which all meet code requirements. Therefore, the stepped footing design is adequate to support the given column load.
Structural Analysis of a Bungalow Reportdouglasloon
Taylor's University Lakeside Campus
School of Architecture, Building & Design
Bachelor of Science (Hons) in Architecture
Building Structures (ARC 2523 / BLD 60103)
Project 2: Structural Analysis of a Bungalow
12-Examples on Compression Members (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mo...Hossam Shafiq II
This document provides examples of calculating the factor resistance of steel columns and angles under axial compression loading. It determines the effective area considering local and global buckling effects. It calculates the critical buckling stress and compares it to design tables. For a double angle, it finds the factor resistance is 427 kN. For a W360x134 column with KLx=12m and KLy=6m, it calculates the factor resistance as 2654.6 kN.
The document provides steps for designing different structural elements:
1. Design of a beam subjected to torsion including calculation of torsional and bending moments, determination of steel requirements, and detailing.
2. Design of continuous beams involving calculation of bending moments and shears, reinforcement sizing, shear design, deflection check, and detailing including curtailment.
3. Design of circular water tanks with both flexible base and rigid base using approximate and IS code methods. This includes sizing hoop and vertical tension reinforcement, sizing wall thickness, designing cantilever sections and base slabs, and providing detailing diagrams.
The document provides derivations of design equations for reinforced concrete beams. It begins by deriving the equation for maximum moment capacity of a singly reinforced beam based on concrete strength as M=0.167*fck*b*d^2. It then derives equations for doubly reinforced beams where compression steel is also required. The document further derives equations for design of flanged beams depending on whether the neutral axis lies within the flange or web. It concludes by outlining design procedures for singly and doubly reinforced beams.
Design of flat plate slab and its Punching Shear Reinf.MD.MAHBUB UL ALAM
This document provides design considerations and an example problem for designing a flat plate slab using the Direct Design Method (DDM). It discusses slab thickness, load calculations, moment distribution, and reinforcement design for a sample four-story building with 16'x20' panels supported by 12" square columns. The design of panel S-4 is shown in detail, calculating loads, moments, and reinforcement requirements for the column and middle strips in both the long and short directions.
Ring or circular rafts can be used for cylindrical structures such as chimneys, silos, storage tanks, TV-towers and other structures. In this case, ring or circular raft is the best suitable foundation to the natural geometry of such structures. The design of circular rafts is quite similar to that of other rafts.
The document summarizes the load distribution calculation for a one-way slab. It provides the given data for the slab, beam, and column dimensions. It then calculates the dead and live loads on the slab based on the self-weight and imposed live loads. The loads are then calculated as they are distributed from the slab to the beams, from the beams to the columns, and finally from the columns to the footing. Equations and diagrams are provided at each step to demonstrate how the loads are calculated and distributed throughout the one-way slab structural system.
The document provides details to design the reinforcement for a basement retaining wall. It includes calculating the required wall thickness, loads on the wall, bending moments, shear forces, and reinforcement requirements. The summary is as follows:
1. The thickness of the basement retaining wall is determined to be 200mm based on the given height and material properties.
2. The loads on the wall, including soil pressure, water pressure, and surcharge loads are calculated.
3. The bending moment and shear force diagrams are drawn, with the maximum bending moment found to be 33.12 kNm and maximum shear force 65.76kN.
4. The required vertical and horizontal reinforcement is calculated for different sections based on
Design methods for torsional buckling of steel structuresBegum Emte Ajom
The document discusses methods for designing steel structures to resist torsional buckling. It summarizes clauses from Eurocode 3 that provide equations for calculating the elastic critical buckling moment and determining the reduction factor used to calculate the design bending strength. It also presents simplified equations that can be used to calculate the elastic critical buckling moment for common steel beam sections. Additional guidance is provided for calculating the critical buckling moment for non-symmetric sections and when bending occurs about the major axis.
Reinforced concrete columns and beams are important structural elements that carry compressive and bending loads respectively. Columns can be categorized as short or long based on their height-width ratio and as spiral or tied columns based on their shape. Beams are classified based on their supports as simply supported, fixed, continuous, or cantilever beams. The construction of RCC columns and beams involves laying reinforcement, forming the structure, and pouring concrete to create these load-bearing elements.
The document summarizes the analysis of reinforced concrete beam cross sections to determine their moment of resistance at the ultimate limit state. It outlines the key assumptions of the strength design method and describes the behavior of beams under small, moderate and ultimate loads. It also discusses balanced, under-reinforced and over-reinforced beam sections, and introduces the concept of the equivalent stress block to simplify calculations. Worked examples are provided to demonstrate how to determine the depth of the neutral axis and moment of resistance for various beam cross sections.
Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000Vikas Mehta
This document discusses the calculation of crack width in reinforced concrete flexural members. It provides information on:
1) Crack width is calculated to satisfy serviceability limits and is only relevant for Type 3 pre-stressed concrete members that crack under service loads.
2) Crack width depends on factors like amount of pre-stress, tensile stress in bars, concrete cover thickness, bar diameter and spacing, member depth and location of neutral axis, bond strength, and concrete tensile strength.
3) The method of calculation involves determining the shortest distance from the surface to a bar and using equations involving member depth, neutral axis depth, average strain at the surface level. Permissible crack widths are specified depending on exposure
This document discusses the design of two-way floor slab systems. It compares the behavior of one-way and two-way slabs, describing how two-way slabs carry load in two directions versus one direction for one-way slabs. Different two-way slab systems like flat plates, waffle slabs, and ribbed slabs are described. Methods for analyzing two-way slabs include direct design, equivalent frame, elastic, plastic, and nonlinear analysis. Design considerations like minimum slab thickness are discussed along with examples calculating thickness.
This document provides details on the design of staircases, including:
1. It describes the typical components of a staircase like flights, landings, risers, treads, nosings, waist slabs, and soffits.
2. It discusses different types of staircases like straight, quarter turn, dog-legged, open well, spiral and helicoidal.
3. It classifies staircases structurally into those with stair slabs spanning transversely or longitudinally and provides examples of each type.
4. It provides an example calculation for the design of a waist slab spanning longitudinally, including loading, bending moment calculation, reinforcement design and checks.
This document provides details on the design and construction of flat slab structures. It discusses the benefits of flat slabs such as flexibility in layout, reduced building height and faster construction. Key considerations for design include wall and column placement, structural layout optimization, deflection checks, crack control and punching shear. Analysis involves dividing the slab into strips and determining moment and shear distributions. Reinforcement is arranged in two directions and detailing includes reinforcement lapping and service penetrations.
- The document describes the design and detailing of flat slabs, which are concrete slabs supported directly by columns without beams.
- Key aspects covered include dimensional considerations, analysis methods, design for bending moments including division of panels and limiting negative moments, shear design and punching shear, deflection and crack control, and design procedures.
- An example problem is provided to illustrate the full design process for an internal panel with drops adjacent to edge panels.
This document discusses a beam deflection drawing assignment completed by student Batool Alshamali with student ID 2013001217 for Dr. Rajai Z. Alrousan's structure analysis course. The assignment involved analyzing beam deflection using a drawing.
This document provides an overview of the design process for reinforced concrete beams. It begins by outlining the basic steps, which include assuming section sizes and materials, calculating loads, checking moments, and sizing reinforcement. It then describes the types of beams as singly or doubly reinforced. Design considerations like the neutral axis and types of sections - balanced, under-reinforced, and over-reinforced - are explained. The detailed 10-step design procedure is then outlined, covering calculations for dimensions, reinforcement for bending and shear, serviceability checks, and providing design details.
- The document discusses the design of a combined footing to support two columns carrying loads of 700 kN and 1000 kN respectively.
- A trapezoidal combined footing of size 7.2m x 2m is designed to support the loads and transmit them uniformly to the soil.
- Longitudinal and transverse reinforcement is designed for the footing and a central beam is included to join the two columns. Detailed design calculations and drawings of the footing and beam are presented.
This resource material is exclusively for the purpose of knowledge dissemination for the use of Civil engineering Fraternity, professionals & students.
This file contains state of art techniques adopted & practiced as per IS456 code provisions for analysis design & detailing of flat slab structural systems.
The presentation aims to provide clear,concise, technical details of flat slabs design.
The presentation deals with structural actions & behavior of flat slabs with visual representations obtained through finite element analysis.
The knowledge gained can be used for designing building structures frequently encountered in construction.
The presentation covers an important feature of slab systems supported on rigid & flexible support & clearly demarcates the minimum beam dimensions required to consider the supports to be either rigid or flexible.
The presentation alsoincludes clear technical drawings to highlight the importance of detailing w.r.t. rebar lay out - positioning & curtailment. Typical section drawing through middle & column strips are also included for visualizing rebar patterns in 3 -d views.
This presentation is an outcome of series of lectures for undergrad & grad students studying in civil engineering.
My next presentation would be on Analysis & design of deep beams.
Kindly mail me ( vvietcivil@gmail.com) your questions & valuable feedback.
1) Two-way slabs are slabs that require reinforcement in two directions because bending occurs in both the longitudinal and transverse directions when the ratio of longest span to shortest span is less than 2.
2) The document discusses various types of two-way slabs and design methods, focusing on the direct design method (DDM).
3) Using the DDM, the total factored load is first calculated, then the total factored moment is distributed to positive and negative moments. The moments are further distributed to column and middle strips using factors that consider the slab and beam properties.
The document describes the design of a stepped footing to support a column with an unfactored load of 800 kN. A square footing with dimensions of 2.1m x 2.1m is designed with two 300mm steps. Reinforcement of #12 bars at 150mm c/c is provided. Checks are performed for bending moment, one-way shear, two-way shear, and development length which all meet code requirements. Therefore, the stepped footing design is adequate to support the given column load.
Structural Analysis of a Bungalow Reportdouglasloon
Taylor's University Lakeside Campus
School of Architecture, Building & Design
Bachelor of Science (Hons) in Architecture
Building Structures (ARC 2523 / BLD 60103)
Project 2: Structural Analysis of a Bungalow
12-Examples on Compression Members (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mo...Hossam Shafiq II
This document provides examples of calculating the factor resistance of steel columns and angles under axial compression loading. It determines the effective area considering local and global buckling effects. It calculates the critical buckling stress and compares it to design tables. For a double angle, it finds the factor resistance is 427 kN. For a W360x134 column with KLx=12m and KLy=6m, it calculates the factor resistance as 2654.6 kN.
The document provides steps for designing different structural elements:
1. Design of a beam subjected to torsion including calculation of torsional and bending moments, determination of steel requirements, and detailing.
2. Design of continuous beams involving calculation of bending moments and shears, reinforcement sizing, shear design, deflection check, and detailing including curtailment.
3. Design of circular water tanks with both flexible base and rigid base using approximate and IS code methods. This includes sizing hoop and vertical tension reinforcement, sizing wall thickness, designing cantilever sections and base slabs, and providing detailing diagrams.
The document provides derivations of design equations for reinforced concrete beams. It begins by deriving the equation for maximum moment capacity of a singly reinforced beam based on concrete strength as M=0.167*fck*b*d^2. It then derives equations for doubly reinforced beams where compression steel is also required. The document further derives equations for design of flanged beams depending on whether the neutral axis lies within the flange or web. It concludes by outlining design procedures for singly and doubly reinforced beams.
Design of flat plate slab and its Punching Shear Reinf.MD.MAHBUB UL ALAM
This document provides design considerations and an example problem for designing a flat plate slab using the Direct Design Method (DDM). It discusses slab thickness, load calculations, moment distribution, and reinforcement design for a sample four-story building with 16'x20' panels supported by 12" square columns. The design of panel S-4 is shown in detail, calculating loads, moments, and reinforcement requirements for the column and middle strips in both the long and short directions.
Ring or circular rafts can be used for cylindrical structures such as chimneys, silos, storage tanks, TV-towers and other structures. In this case, ring or circular raft is the best suitable foundation to the natural geometry of such structures. The design of circular rafts is quite similar to that of other rafts.
The document summarizes the load distribution calculation for a one-way slab. It provides the given data for the slab, beam, and column dimensions. It then calculates the dead and live loads on the slab based on the self-weight and imposed live loads. The loads are then calculated as they are distributed from the slab to the beams, from the beams to the columns, and finally from the columns to the footing. Equations and diagrams are provided at each step to demonstrate how the loads are calculated and distributed throughout the one-way slab structural system.
The document provides details to design the reinforcement for a basement retaining wall. It includes calculating the required wall thickness, loads on the wall, bending moments, shear forces, and reinforcement requirements. The summary is as follows:
1. The thickness of the basement retaining wall is determined to be 200mm based on the given height and material properties.
2. The loads on the wall, including soil pressure, water pressure, and surcharge loads are calculated.
3. The bending moment and shear force diagrams are drawn, with the maximum bending moment found to be 33.12 kNm and maximum shear force 65.76kN.
4. The required vertical and horizontal reinforcement is calculated for different sections based on
Design methods for torsional buckling of steel structuresBegum Emte Ajom
The document discusses methods for designing steel structures to resist torsional buckling. It summarizes clauses from Eurocode 3 that provide equations for calculating the elastic critical buckling moment and determining the reduction factor used to calculate the design bending strength. It also presents simplified equations that can be used to calculate the elastic critical buckling moment for common steel beam sections. Additional guidance is provided for calculating the critical buckling moment for non-symmetric sections and when bending occurs about the major axis.
Reinforced concrete columns and beams are important structural elements that carry compressive and bending loads respectively. Columns can be categorized as short or long based on their height-width ratio and as spiral or tied columns based on their shape. Beams are classified based on their supports as simply supported, fixed, continuous, or cantilever beams. The construction of RCC columns and beams involves laying reinforcement, forming the structure, and pouring concrete to create these load-bearing elements.
The document summarizes the analysis of reinforced concrete beam cross sections to determine their moment of resistance at the ultimate limit state. It outlines the key assumptions of the strength design method and describes the behavior of beams under small, moderate and ultimate loads. It also discusses balanced, under-reinforced and over-reinforced beam sections, and introduces the concept of the equivalent stress block to simplify calculations. Worked examples are provided to demonstrate how to determine the depth of the neutral axis and moment of resistance for various beam cross sections.
Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000Vikas Mehta
This document discusses the calculation of crack width in reinforced concrete flexural members. It provides information on:
1) Crack width is calculated to satisfy serviceability limits and is only relevant for Type 3 pre-stressed concrete members that crack under service loads.
2) Crack width depends on factors like amount of pre-stress, tensile stress in bars, concrete cover thickness, bar diameter and spacing, member depth and location of neutral axis, bond strength, and concrete tensile strength.
3) The method of calculation involves determining the shortest distance from the surface to a bar and using equations involving member depth, neutral axis depth, average strain at the surface level. Permissible crack widths are specified depending on exposure
This document discusses the design of two-way floor slab systems. It compares the behavior of one-way and two-way slabs, describing how two-way slabs carry load in two directions versus one direction for one-way slabs. Different two-way slab systems like flat plates, waffle slabs, and ribbed slabs are described. Methods for analyzing two-way slabs include direct design, equivalent frame, elastic, plastic, and nonlinear analysis. Design considerations like minimum slab thickness are discussed along with examples calculating thickness.
This document provides details on the design of staircases, including:
1. It describes the typical components of a staircase like flights, landings, risers, treads, nosings, waist slabs, and soffits.
2. It discusses different types of staircases like straight, quarter turn, dog-legged, open well, spiral and helicoidal.
3. It classifies staircases structurally into those with stair slabs spanning transversely or longitudinally and provides examples of each type.
4. It provides an example calculation for the design of a waist slab spanning longitudinally, including loading, bending moment calculation, reinforcement design and checks.
This document provides details on the design and construction of flat slab structures. It discusses the benefits of flat slabs such as flexibility in layout, reduced building height and faster construction. Key considerations for design include wall and column placement, structural layout optimization, deflection checks, crack control and punching shear. Analysis involves dividing the slab into strips and determining moment and shear distributions. Reinforcement is arranged in two directions and detailing includes reinforcement lapping and service penetrations.
- The document describes the design and detailing of flat slabs, which are concrete slabs supported directly by columns without beams.
- Key aspects covered include dimensional considerations, analysis methods, design for bending moments including division of panels and limiting negative moments, shear design and punching shear, deflection and crack control, and design procedures.
- An example problem is provided to illustrate the full design process for an internal panel with drops adjacent to edge panels.
This document discusses the design of flat slab structures. It begins by defining a flat slab as a type of slab supported directly on columns without beams. It then provides details on the types of flat slabs, their common uses in buildings, and benefits such as flexibility in layout and reduced construction time. The document goes on to discuss key design considerations for flat slabs including thickness, drops, column heads, and methods of analysis. It focuses on the direct design method and provides limitations for its use.
Flat slabs are reinforced concrete slabs that are supported directly by columns without beams. They provide minimum depth, fast construction, and flexible column placement. There are four main types: slabs without drops and with column heads, slabs with drops and without column heads, slabs with both drops and column heads, and typical flat slabs. Column heads increase shear strength while drops increase shear strength and negative moment capacity. Flat slab systems can be either one-way or two-way depending on span ratios and load distribution. Advantages include simple formwork, no beams, and minimum depth, while disadvantages include potential interference from drops.
This document summarizes the key aspects of flat slab construction and design according to Indian code IS 456-2000. It defines flat slabs as slabs that are directly supported by columns without beams, and describes four common types based on whether drops and column heads are used. The main topics covered include guidelines for proportioning slabs and drops, methods for determining bending moments and shear forces, requirements for slab reinforcement, and an example problem demonstrating the design of an interior flat slab panel.
This document provides an overview of design in reinforced concrete according to BS 8110. It discusses the basic materials used - concrete and steel reinforcement - and their properties. It describes two limit states for design: ultimate limit state considering failure, and serviceability limit state considering deflection and cracking. Key aspects of beam design are summarized, including types of beams, design for bending and shear resistance, and limiting deflection. Reinforcement detailing rules are also briefly covered.
The document discusses the benefits of meditation for reducing stress and anxiety. Regular meditation practice can help calm the mind and body by lowering heart rate and blood pressure. Studies have shown that meditating for just 10-20 minutes per day can have significant positive impacts on both mental and physical health over time.
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive functioning. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help boost feelings of calmness, happiness and focus.
This document discusses the design of flat plate slabs. Flat plates are concrete slabs that are carried directly by columns without beams or girders. They are commonly used for spans up to 25 feet and loads up to 100 pounds per square foot. The load is directly transferred to the columns, making punching shear at the column connections critical. Proper reinforcement detailing is required between the slab and columns. Moment determination and shear design are important steps in the flat plate slab design process. Advantages include simplified formwork and reduced story height, while limitations include increased thickness and weight.
Reinforced concrete slabs are used in floors, roofs, and walls. They can span in one or two directions and be supported by beams, walls, or columns. This document discusses the design of reinforced concrete slabs, including types of slabs, load analysis, shear design, reinforcement details, and provides examples of designing solid slabs spanning in one direction. The goal is to teach students to properly design and analyze reinforced concrete slabs according to code.
Pt slab design philosophy with slides and pictures showing benefitPerwez Ahmad
This document summarizes the history and development of post-tensioned flat slab construction. It began with early research and development of prestressing in Europe in the 1920s-1930s to allow for longer bridge spans. Prestressing was later applied to other structures like aircraft hangars and then to flat slab construction in the 1950s. Post-tensioned flat slabs provide benefits over reinforced concrete flat slabs like reduced cracking, thinner slabs, and increased spans. The document discusses materials, design codes, comparisons to reinforced concrete, and examples of ongoing post-tensioned flat slab projects in Oman.
Guide to the design and construction of reinforced concrete flat slabs (1)abbdou001
This document provides guidance on the design and construction of reinforced concrete flat slabs according to Eurocode standards. It discusses factors that influence flat slab design and construction such as the type of structure, client requirements, planning rules, ground conditions, and contractor preferences. It also covers typical flat slab behavior, design considerations, construction methods, detailing, and analysis techniques. The document aims to help designers understand flat slab structural behavior and best practices for design and construction.
The document provides a summary of modeling and analyzing slabs in ETABS, including:
1) Common assumptions made in slab modeling such as element type, meshing, shape, and acceptable error.
2) Steps for initial analysis including sketching expected results and comparing total loads.
3) Formulas and coefficients for calculating maximum bending moments in one-way and two-way slabs.
4) A process for designing solid slabs according to Eurocode 2 involving determining reinforcement ratios and areas.
This document discusses different types of flat slab structures including those without and with drops and column heads. It outlines direct design and equivalent frame methods for analysis and highlights advantages like cost savings and disadvantages like minimum span requirements. The document also notes applications of flat slab structures.
This presentation summarizes the key aspects of one-way slab design. It defines one-way slabs as having an aspect ratio of 2:1 or greater, with bending primarily along the long axis. The presentation discusses the types of one-way slabs including solid, hollow, and ribbed. It also outlines the design considerations for one-way slabs according to the ACI code, including minimum thickness, reinforcement ratios, and bar spacing. An example problem demonstrates how to design a one-way slab for a given set of loading and dimensional conditions.
Multi storey building design of 7 storey commercial buildingRazes Dhakal
This document summarizes the structural analysis and design of a 7-storey commercial building in Bhaktapur, Nepal. The project members modeled the building in SAP 2000 and designed the structural components including slabs, beams, columns, staircases, basement walls, lifts, and raft foundation. The structural design followed codes IS456, IS875, IS1893, and considered seismic and gravity loads. The building has RCC framed structure with raft foundation. Structural elements were designed for strength and serviceability limits states.
The document discusses reinforced concrete columns, including their functions, failure modes, classifications, and design considerations. Columns primarily resist axial compression but may also experience bending moments. They can fail due to compression, buckling, or a combination. Design depends on whether the column is short or slender, braced or unbraced. Reinforcement is designed based on the column's expected loads and dimensions using methods specified in design codes like BS 8110.
This document summarizes the design of a one-way slab for a multi-story building. Key steps include:
1) Determining the effective span is 3.125m based on the room dimensions and support thickness.
2) Calculating the factored bending moment of 5.722 kNm/m based on the loads and effective span.
3) Checking that the provided depth of 150mm is greater than the required depth of 45.53mm.
4) Sizing the main reinforcement as 130mm^2 based on the factored moment and concrete properties.
5) Specifying 10mm diameter bars spaced at 300mm centers along the shorter span.
This document provides instructions for installing PROKON structural analysis software. It discusses both standalone and network installations. For standalone installation, the user runs the setup file to copy program files to their computer and then activates the programs. For network installation, the user copies files to a server, activates the programs on the server to allow simultaneous network use, and configures workstations by creating shortcuts. The document provides detailed steps for each part of the installation and activation processes.
Sachpazis RC Slab Analysis and Design in accordance with EN 1992 1-1 2004-Two...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
- GEODOMISI Ltd is a civil and geotechnical engineering consulting company located in Greece.
- The document provides details on the analysis and design of a reinforced concrete slab according to Eurocode standards, including slab dimensions, material properties, loading, and reinforcement design calculations at various locations.
- The reinforcement designs at midspan and supports in both span directions meet code requirements for area of steel and bar spacing.
Sachpazis: Steel member design in biaxial bending and axial compression examp...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
This document provides a summary of the design of a steel member according to Eurocode 3. It includes:
- Details of the steel section being designed, including dimensions, material properties, and classification.
- Checks for shear, bending, axial compression, and buckling according to Eurocode 3, ensuring the design capacities exceed the design forces in each case.
- A summary of the design confirming the steel member meets all requirements for its intended loading based on the specifications in Eurocode 3.
Sachpazis masonry column with eccentric vertical and wind loading in accordan...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
This document summarizes the analysis and design of a clay masonry column according to Eurocode standards. It provides details of the column geometry, material properties, loads, and calculations to check the column's capacity against bending moments. The column passes all checks for strength and stability.
Masonry column with eccentric vertical loading Analysis & Design, in accordance with EN1996-1-1:2005 incorporating corrigenda February 2006 and July 2009 and the recommended values.
This document summarizes the analysis and design of an RC beam according to Eurocode standards. It provides details of the beam geometry, materials, loading, and results of the structural analysis. The summary analyzes the beam over two zones for positive and negative bending moments to check reinforcement requirements for strength and crack control are satisfied according to code specifications.
Sachpazis: Strip Foundation Analysis and Design example (EN1997-1:2004)Dr.Costas Sachpazis
Strip Foundation Analysis and Design example, in accordance with EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the recommended values
This document provides a raft foundation design analysis and design in accordance with BS8110 Part 1-1997. It includes definitions of the soil properties, raft geometry, material properties, and loading. It then performs checks for bearing capacity, bending, shear, and deflection for the internal slab and edge beams. Reinforcement is designed for the slab and edge beams to satisfy the various design checks.
This document provides design calculations for structural elements of a concrete car park structure according to BS-8110, including:
1. A one-way spanning roof slab with a span of 2.8m, designed as simply supported with 10mm main reinforcement bars at 300mm spacing and 8mm secondary bars.
2. A load distribution beam D and non-load bearing beam E, with calculations provided for beam D's dead and imposed loads.
3. Requirements include individual work submission by January 2nd, 2016 and assumptions to be clearly stated.
Sachpazis: Raft Foundation Analysis and Design for a two Storey House Project...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
This document provides an analysis and design of a raft foundation for a two-story house project. It includes definitions of the soil properties, raft slab geometry, reinforcement, and other structural elements. Calculations are shown for checks of internal slab bearing pressure, bending moments, shear forces, and reinforcement requirements in accordance with relevant code standards. The analysis confirms that the applied bearing pressure is less than the allowable soil pressure and that the provided reinforcement is adequate.
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptxDP NITHIN
Complete introduction to the design and design concepts, design of structural
members like slabs, beams, columns, footing etc. along with their calculation and
Detailing through structural drawings.
Sachpazis: Reinforced Concrete Beam Analysis & Design Example (EN1992-1-3)Dr.Costas Sachpazis
This document provides details for the analysis and design of a reinforced concrete beam according to Eurocode 2 (EN1992-1). It includes the beam geometry, material properties, applied loads and load combinations, analysis results for shear and bending moment, and design checks for flexure, shear, and crack control. The beam has three spans supported by A, B, and C and is designed as a rectangular section with 4 top and 2 bottom bars. Design checks are provided for the critical cross sections at supports A and the maximum shear location.
Explains in detail about the planning and designing of a G + 2 school building both manually and using software (STAAD Pro).
With the reference with this we could design a building of a school with 2 blocks and G + 2 building.
Similar to Sachpazis: Flat slab design to bs8110 part 1-1997 (20)
Sachpazis_Consolidation Settlement Calculation Program-The Python Code and th...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
Consolidation Settlement Calculation Program-The Python Code
By Professor Dr. Costas Sachpazis, Civil Engineer & Geologist
This program calculates the consolidation settlement for a foundation based on soil layer properties and foundation data. It allows users to input multiple soil layers and foundation characteristics to determine the total settlement.
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
Terzaghi's soil bearing capacity theory, developed by Karl Terzaghi, is a fundamental principle in geotechnical engineering used to determine the bearing capacity of shallow foundations. This theory provides a method to calculate the ultimate bearing capacity of soil, which is the maximum load per unit area that the soil can support without undergoing shear failure. The Calculation HTML Code included.
Seismic Hazard Assessment Software in Python by Prof. Dr. Costas SachpazisDr.Costas Sachpazis
This simple Python software is designed to assist Civil and Geotechnical Engineers in performing site-specific seismic hazard assessments. The program calculates the seismic response spectrum based on user-provided geotechnical and seismic parameters, generating a comprehensive technical report that includes the response spectrum data and figures. The analysis adheres to Eurocode 8 and the Greek Annex, ensuring compliance with international standards for earthquake-resistant design.
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for Students and Professionals.
Unlock the potential of foundation design with Dr. Costas Sachpazis’s enlightening handbook, a meticulously crafted guide poised to become an indispensable resource for both budding and seasoned civil engineers. This comprehensive manual illuminates the theoretical and practical aspects of structural analysis and design across various types of foundations and retaining walls.
Within these pages, Dr. Sachpazis distills complex engineering principles into digestible, step-by-step processes, enhanced by detailed diagrams, case studies, and real-world examples that bridge the gap between academic study and professional application. From soil mechanics and load calculations to innovative design techniques and sustainability considerations, this book covers a vast landscape of structural engineering.
Key Features:
• In-Depth Analysis and Design: Explore thorough explanations of both shallow and deep foundation designs, supported by case studies that demonstrate their practical implementations.
• Practical Guides: Benefit from detailed guides on site investigation, bearing capacity calculations, and settlement analysis, ensuring designs are both robust and reliable.
• Innovative Techniques: Discover the latest advancements in foundation technology and retaining wall design, preparing you for future trends in civil engineering.
• Educational Tools: Utilize this handbook as an educational tool, perfect for both classroom learning and professional development.
Whether you're a student eager to learn the fundamentals or a professional seeking to deepen your expertise, Dr. Sachpazis’s handbook is designed to support and inspire excellence in the field of structural engineering. Embrace this opportunity to enhance your skills and contribute to building safer, more efficient structures.
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineers. By Dr. Costas Sachpazis.
A Technical Report provides information on Geotechnical Exploration and testing procedures, analysis techniques, allowable criteria, design procedures, and construction consideration for the selection, design, and installation of sheet pile walls.
"Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineers" by Dr. Costas Sachpazis provides an in-depth look into the engineering, design, and construction of sheet pile walls. The book details geotechnical exploration, testing procedures, and analysis techniques essential for determining soil properties and stability under various conditions, including seismic activity. It also covers the impact of groundwater on wall design and offers methods for controlling it during construction. Practical considerations for confined space work and the use of emerging technologies in sheet pile construction are discussed. The guide serves as a comprehensive resource for civil engineers aiming to enhance their expertise in creating durable and effective sheet pile wall solutions for complex engineering projects.
Sachpazis Costas: Geotechnical Engineering: A student's Perspective IntroductionDr.Costas Sachpazis
Geotechnical Engineering: A Student's Perspective
By Dr. Costas Sachpazis.
Geotechnical engineering is a branch of civil engineering that focuses on the behavior of earth materials such as soil and rock. It is a crucial aspect of any construction project, as the properties of the ground can have a significant impact on the design and stability of structures. Geotechnical engineers work to understand the physical and mechanical properties of soil and rock, as well as how these materials interact with man-made structures.
Geotechnical engineering plays a crucial role in the field of civil engineering, as it deals with the behavior of earth materials and how they interact with structures. Understanding the properties of soil and rock beneath the surface is essential for designing safe and stable structures that can withstand various loads and environmental conditions. Without proper knowledge of geotechnical engineering, civil engineers would not be able to ensure the safety and longevity of their projects.
Sachpazis: Steel member fire resistance design to Eurocode 3 / Σαχπάζης: Σχεδ...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
This document summarizes the fire resistance design of a steel member according to EN1993-1-2:2005. The design checks the member for shear, bending moment, temperature, and time to critical temperature under fire conditions. The summary shows the member passes all criteria with utilization levels below 1.0. Key details of the member, loading, fire protection, and temperature analysis are provided.
Sachpazis_Retaining Structures-Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems_C_Sachpazi...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
A retaining wall is a structure that is designed to hold back soil or other materials when there is a change in ground elevation. Retaining walls are commonly used in civil engineering to support soil and prevent erosion. They are typically constructed of various materials, including concrete, masonry, and timber.
Retaining walls are used in a variety of settings, including residential and commercial construction, roadways and highways, and landscaping projects. They are often used to create level areas for building or landscaping by holding back soil or other materials on sloping terrain.
The design of a retaining wall depends on several factors, including the type of soil, the height of the wall, and the slope of the ground. There are several types of retaining walls, including gravity walls, cantilever walls, sheet pile walls, and anchored walls. The type of wall used depends on the specific requirements of the project.
Overall, retaining walls are an important component of civil engineering projects and are used to support soil and prevent erosion. They require careful design and construction to ensure their stability and effectiveness.
Single pile analysis & design, l=18,00m d=1,10m, by C.SachpazisDr.Costas Sachpazis
This document provides input data and analysis for the design of a single pile with a length of 18 meters and diameter of 1.1 meters. It includes soil parameters, load assumptions, and analysis of the pile's vertical and horizontal bearing capacity. The analysis found the pile has adequate bearing capacity for the applied loads with a maximum settlement of 3.2 mm under the service load condition.
Pile configuration optimization on the design of combined piled raft foundationsDr.Costas Sachpazis
By: Birhanu Asefa, Eleyas Assefa, Lysandros Pantelidis,Costas Sachpazis
This paper examines the impact of different pile configurations and geometric parameters on the bearing capacity and the settlement response of a combined pile–raft foundation system utilizing FLAC3D software. The configurations considered were: (1) uniform piles (denoted as CONF1), (2) shorter and longer piles uniformly distributed on the plan view of the raft (CONF2), (3) shorter piles at the center and longer piles at the edge of the raft (CONF3), and (4) longer piles at the center and shorter piles at the edge of the raft (CONF4). In the same framework, different pile diameters and raft stiffnesses were examined. The piles are considered to float in a cohesive–frictional soil mass, simulating the thick cohesive soil deposit found in Addis Abeba (Ethiopia). During simulation, a zero-thickness interface element was employed to incorporate the complex interaction between the soil elements and the structural elements. The analyses indicate that the configuration of piles has a considerable effect on both the bearing capacity and the settlement response of the foundation system. CONF1 and CONF3 improve the bearing capacity and exhibits a smaller average settlement than other configurations. However, CONF3 registers the highest differential settlement. On the other hand, the lowest differential settlement was achieved by the CONF4 configuration; the same configuration also gives ultimate load resistance comparable to those provided by either CONF1 or CONF3. The study also showed that applying zero-thickness interface elements to simulate the interaction between components of the foundation system is suitable for examining piled raft foundations problem.
Σαχπάζης Πλεονεκτήματα και Προκλήσεις της Αιολικής ΕνέργειαςDr.Costas Sachpazis
Σαχπάζης: Πλεονεκτήματα και Προκλήσεις της Αιολικής Ενέργειας.
Πλεονεκτήματα και Προκλήσεις της Αιολικής Ενέργειας
Από Κώστα Σαχπάζη, Πολιτικό Μηχανικό, καθηγητή Πολυτεχνικής Σχολής στην Γεωτεχνική Μηχανική
Η αιολική ενέργεια προσφέρει πολλά πλεονεκτήματα, κάτι που εξηγεί γιατί είναι μια από τις ταχύτερα αναπτυσσόμενες πηγές ενέργειας στον κόσμο. Οι ερευνητικές προσπάθειες αποσκοπούν στην αντιμετώπιση των προκλήσεων για μεγαλύτερη χρήση της αιολικής ενέργειας.
Καθώς είναι πιο καθαρή και φιλική προς το κλίμα, η Αιολική Ενέργεια χρησιμοποιείται ολοένα και περισσότερο για να καλύψει τις συνεχώς αυξανόμενες παγκόσμιες ενεργειακές απαιτήσεις. Στην Ελλάδα, υπάρχει ένα μεγάλο κενό μεταξύ των Αιολικών Πόρων και της πραγματικής παραγωγής ενέργειας, και είναι επιτακτική ανάγκη να επεκταθεί η ανάπτυξη της αιολικής ενέργειας, ιδιαίτερα στις ημέρες μας μετά από την Νέα Εποχή της Απολιγνιτοποίησης που έχουμε εισέλθει με βάση τις προσταγές και τους νόμους της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης.
Ας δούμε όμως παρακάτω περισσότερα για τα οφέλη της αιολικής ενέργειας και μερικές από τις προκλήσεις που προσπαθεί να ξεπεράσει:
Πλεονεκτήματα της Αιολικής Ενέργειας
Sachpazis_Pile Analysis and Design for Acropolis Project According to EN 1997...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
1) The document provides details of a circular column pile design including input parameters such as pile dimensions, safety factors, design parameters, settlement parameters, and layer properties.
2) It summarizes the calculations of layer capacities, total capacities, design capacities, and settlement at service and ultimate limit states.
3) Key outputs include a design load of 3600 kN, a calculated capacity of 5527.83 kN, an Everett settlement of 3.43 mm at SLS and 5.21 mm at ULS, and a required reinforcement area of 2544.69 mm2.
Παράδειγμα ανάλυσης και σχεδίασης Ζευκτών (Trusses) σύμφωνα με τον Ευρωκώδικα EC3, του Δρ. Κώστα Σαχπάζη.
Truss Analysis and Design example to EC3, by Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Differential settlement occurs when different parts of a building's foundation settle by different amounts, causing the building to sink unevenly. This can be caused by variations in soil strength or compaction issues. Uniform settlement across a building is expected over time but differential settlement can damage a building's structure. Signs may include cracks, sticking doors and windows, and leaning walls. Proper site inspection and using deep foundations like helical piers in expansive soils can help prevent differential settlement issues.
Value based approach to heritae conservation -.docxJIT KUMAR GUPTA
Text defines the role, importance and relevance of value based approach in identification, preservation and conservation of heritage to make it more productive and community centric.
Menus are ubiquitous in websites and applications of all types. They are critical to accessing the information and actions that users need, yet they can be very frustrating to use. In our UX consulting practice, many clients have come to us for help solving problems with menus, such as scaling to handle long lists of options, and overcoming usability issues with hover and flyout menus. In this presentation we’ll review what we have learned about best practices for designing mega menus, context menus, hamburger menus, full page menus and other types, and share case studies of menu redesigns we have worked on for enterprise applications, mobile apps, and information-rich websites.
World trade center in kerala proposal- AR. DEEKSHITH MAROLI 724519251008 REPORTdeekshithmaroli666
World trade center live proposal in kerala.
Future of our nation is looking towards kerala..?
Yes, because the biggest sludge less port is going to open in kerala soon and also about the hidden massing growth of tourism, it , business sector
Design Thinking is a problem-solving framework that emphasizes a user-centered approach to innovation and design. It involves understanding user needs, challenging assumptions, redefining problems, and creating innovative solutions through iterative testing and refinement. The process is typically divided into five stages:
Empathize: Understand the users and their needs through observation, interviews, and user research. This stage focuses on gaining a deep insight into the user's experiences and emotions.
Define: Clearly articulate the problem or challenge based on the insights gathered during the empathize stage. This involves synthesizing the information to define the core issues that need to be addressed.
Ideate: Generate a wide range of creative ideas and potential solutions. This stage encourages brainstorming and thinking outside the box to explore different possibilities.
Prototype: Create tangible representations of selected ideas. Prototypes can be simple sketches, models, or interactive simulations that allow designers to explore and test their concepts.
Test: Evaluate the prototypes with real users to gather feedback and insights. This stage involves refining and improving the solutions based on user interactions and responses.
Design Thinking is iterative, meaning that the stages are revisited as needed to refine the solution. It promotes collaboration, creativity, and a deep understanding of the user, leading to more effective and innovative outcomes. This approach is widely used in various fields, including product design, service design, business strategy, and social innovation.
UI (User Interface) and UX (User Experience) design are critical components of creating effective, user-friendly digital products.
UI Design focuses on the visual aspects of a product. It involves designing the layout, buttons, icons, and other interactive elements that users interact with. A good UI design ensures that the product is visually appealing, consistent, and intuitive, making it easy for users to navigate and complete their tasks.
UX Design, on the other hand, is about the overall experience a user has with a product. It encompasses the entire user journey, from the initial discovery of the product to its continued use. UX designers conduct user research, create user personas, and develop wireframes and prototypes to ensure that the product meets the users' needs effectively. A strong UX design makes the product accessible, enjoyable, and valuable to the user.
Together, UI and UX design aim to create products that are not only functional and easy to use but also delightful and engaging. While UI design is concerned with the product’s aesthetics and interactive components, UX design focuses on the user’s overall journey and satisfaction. Combining both fields leads to a cohesive, effective, and user-centered product design.
UI/UX design is an essential discipline in the digital world, focusing on creating user-friendly and visually app
This is Stage one of my Future Deep Strike Aircraft project to develop a replacement for the FB-111 / F-111F / F-15E and B-1B. This stage covers requirements and threats. Stage 2 will cover Design Studies, and the CCA Wingman.
💕SIMRAN VARMA💕Book Call Girls Jaipur ↘️8445551418↙️One Night Stand With Lonel...
Sachpazis: Flat slab design to bs8110 part 1-1997
1. Job Ref.
Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Date
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Chk'd by
Date
18/01/2014
App'd by
Date
FLAT SLAB DESIGN TO BS8110:PART 1:1997
Slab geometry
Span of slab in x-direction;
Spanx = 7200 mm
Span of slab in y-direction;
Spany = 7200 mm
Column dimension in x-direction;
lx = 400 mm
Column dimension in y-direction;
ly = 400 mm
External column dimension in x-direction;
lx1 = 250 mm
External column dimension in y-direction;
ly1 = 250 mm
Edge dimension in x-direction;
ex = lx1 / 2 = 125 mm
Edge dimension in y-direction;
ey = ly1 / 2 = 125 mm
Effective span of internal bay in x direction;
Lx = Spanx – lx = 6800 mm
Effective span of internal bay in y direction;
Ly = Spany – ly = 6800 mm
Effective span of end bay in x direction;
Lx1 = Spanx – lx / 2 = 7000 mm
Effective span of end bay in y direction;
Ly1 = Spany – ly / 2 = 7000 mm
ex
B
C
Span x
Span x
lx
ey
1
A
lx
l y1
Sp
an
y
lx1
ly
Sp
an
y
2
ly
3
h
Slab details
Depth of slab;
h = 250 mm
1
2. Job Ref.
Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
18/01/2014
App'd by
Date
2
Characteristic strength of concrete;
fcu = 35 N/mm
Characteristic strength of reinforcement;
fy = 500 N/mm
Characteristic strength of shear reinforcement;
fyv = 500 N/mm
Material safety factor;
γm = 1.15
2
2
Cover to bottom reinforcement;
c = 20 mm
Cover to top reinforcement;
c’ = 20 mm
Loading details
2
Characteristic dead load;
Gk = 7.000 kN/m
Characteristic imposed load;
Qk = 5.000 kN/m
2
Dead load factor;
γG = 1.4
Imposed load factor;
γQ = 1.6
Total ultimate load;
Nult = (Gk × γG) + (Qk × γQ) = 17.800 kN/m
Moment redistribution ratio;
βb = 1.0
Ratio of support moments to span moments;
i = 1.0
2
DESIGN SLAB IN THE X-DIRECTION
SAGGING MOMENTS
End bay A-B
Effective span;
L = 7000 mm
Depth of reinforcement;
d = 200 mm
Midspan moment;
m = (Nult × L ) / (2 × (1 + √(1 + i)) ) = 74.823 kNm/m
Support moment;
m’ = i × m = 74.823 kNm/m
2
2
Design reinforcement
Lever arm;
2
K’ = 0.402 × (βb – 0.4) – 0.18 × (βb – 0.4) = 0.176
2
K = m / (d × fcu) = 0.053
Compression reinforcement is not required
z = min((0.5 + √(0.25 – (K / 0.9))), 0.95) × d = 187.3 mm
Area of reinforcement designed;
2
As_des = m / (z × fy / γm) = 919 mm /m
2
Minimum area of reinforcement required;
As_min = 0.0013 × h = 325 mm /m
Area of reinforcement required;
As_req = max(As_des, As_min) = 919 mm /m
2
Provide 20 dia bars @ 150 centres
Area of reinforcement provided;
2
2
As_prov = π × D / (4 × s) = 2094 mm /m
PASS - Span reinforcement is OK
Check deflection
Design service stress;
fs = 2 × fy × As_req / (3 × As_prov × βb) = 146 N/mm
2
2
2
2
Modification factor;
k1 = min(0.55+(477N/mm -fs)/(120×(0.9N/mm +(m/d ))),2) = 1.545
Allowable span to depth ratio;
0.9 × 26 × k1 = 36.151
Actual span to depth ratio;
L / d = 35.000
2
3. Job Ref.
Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
18/01/2014
App'd by
Date
PASS - Span to depth ratio is OK
Internal bay B-C
Effective span;
L = 6800 mm
Depth of reinforcement;
d = 202 mm
Midspan moment;
m = (Nult × L ) / (2 × (√(1 + i) + √(1 + i)) ) = 51.442 kNm/m
Support moment;
m’ = i × m = 51.442 kNm/m
2
2
Design reinforcement
Lever arm;
2
K’ = 0.402 × (βb – 0.4) – 0.18 × (βb – 0.4) = 0.176
2
K = m / (d × fcu) = 0.036
Compression reinforcement is not required
z = min((0.5 + √(0.25 – (K / 0.9))), 0.95) × d = 191.9 mm
2
Area of reinforcement designed;
As_des = m / (z × fy / γm) = 617 mm /m
Minimum area of reinforcement required;
As_min = 0.0013 × h = 325 mm /m
Area of reinforcement required;
As_req = max(As_des, As_min) = 617 mm /m
2
2
Provide 16 dia bars @ 200 centres
Area of reinforcement provided;
2
2
As_prov = π × D / (4 × s) = 1005 mm /m
PASS - Span reinforcement is OK
Check deflection
2
Design service stress;
fs = 2 × fy × As_req / (3 × As_prov × βb) = 204 N/mm
Modification factor;
k1 = min(0.55+(477N/mm -fs)/(120×(0.9N/mm +(m/d ))),2) = 1.601
Allowable span to depth ratio;
0.9 × 26 × k1 = 37.469
Actual span to depth ratio;
L / d = 33.663
2
2
2
PASS - Span to depth ratio is OK
HOGGING MOMENTS – INTERNAL STRIP
Penultimate column B3
Consider the reinforcement concentrated in half width strip over the support
Depth of reinforcement;
d’ = 200 mm
Support moment;
m’ = 2 × i × m = 149.646 kNm/m
Lever arm;
K’ = 0.402 × (βb – 0.4) – 0.18 × (βb – 0.4) = 0.176
2
2
K = m’ / (d’ × fcu) = 0.107
Compression reinforcement is not required
z = min((0.5 + √(0.25 – (K / 0.9))), 0.95) × d’ = 172.5 mm
Area of reinforcement required;
2
As_des = m’ / (z × fy / γm) = 1996 mm /m
2
Minimum area of reinforcement required;
As_min = 0.0013 × h = 325 mm /m
Area of reinforcement required;
As_req = max(As_des, As_min) = 1996 mm /m
2
Provide 20 dia bars @ 150 centres
Area of reinforcement provided;
2
2
As_prov = π × D / (4 × s) = 2094 mm /m
PASS - Support reinforcement is OK
3
4. Job Ref.
Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
18/01/2014
App'd by
Date
Internal column C3
Consider the reinforcement concentrated in half width strip over the support
Depth of reinforcement;
d’ = 200 mm
Support moment;
m’ = 2 × i × m = 102.884 kNm/m
Lever arm;
K’ = 0.402 × (βb – 0.4) – 0.18 × (βb – 0.4) = 0.176
2
2
K = m’ / (d’ × fcu) = 0.073
Compression reinforcement is not required
z = min((0.5 + √(0.25 – (K / 0.9))), 0.95) × d’ = 182.1 mm
2
Area of reinforcement required;
As_des = m’ / (z × fy / γm) = 1300 mm /m
Minimum area of reinforcement required;
As_min = 0.0013 × h = 325 mm /m
Area of reinforcement required;
As_req = max(As_des, As_min) = 1300 mm /m
2
2
Provide 20 dia bars @ 200 centres
Area of reinforcement provided;
2
2
As_prov = π × D / (4 × s) = 1571 mm /m
PASS - Support reinforcement is OK
HOGGING MOMENTS – EXTERNAL STRIP
Penultimate column B1, B2
Consider one and a half bays of negative moment being resisted over the edge and penultimate column
Width of span;
B = 7200 mm
Edge distance;
e = 125 mm
Depth of reinforcement;
d’ = 200 mm
Support moment;
m’ = m × i ×(e + B + B / 2) / ((0.5 × B) + (0.2 × B) + e) = 158.265
kNm/m
Lever arm;
2
K’ = 0.402 × (βb – 0.4) – 0.18 × (βb – 0.4) = 0.176
2
K = m’ / (d’ × fcu) = 0.113
Compression reinforcement is not required
z = min((0.5 + √(0.25 – (K / 0.9))), 0.95) × d’ = 170.5 mm
Area of reinforcement required;
2
As_des = m’ / (z × fy / γm) = 2134 mm /m
2
Minimum area of reinforcement required;
As_min = 0.0013 × h = 325 mm /m
Area of reinforcement required;
As_req = max(As_des, As_min) = 2134 mm /m
2
Provide 20 dia bars @ 125 centres
Area of reinforcement provided;
2
2
As_prov = π × D / (4 × s) = 2513 mm /m
PASS - Support reinforcement is OK
Internal column C1, C2
Consider one and a half bays of negative moment being resisted over the edge and penultimate column
Width of span;
B = 7200 mm
Edge distance;
e = 125 mm
Depth of reinforcement;
d’ = 200 mm
Support moment;
m’ = m × i ×(e + B + B / 2) / ((0.5 × B) + (0.2 × B) + e) = 108.810
kNm/m
4
5. Job Ref.
Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Lever arm;
Date
Chk'd by
Date
18/01/2014
App'd by
Date
2
K’ = 0.402 × (βb – 0.4) – 0.18 × (βb – 0.4) = 0.176
2
K = m’ / (d’ × fcu) = 0.078
Compression reinforcement is not required
z = min((0.5 + √(0.25 – (K / 0.9))), 0.95) × d’ = 180.9 mm
2
Area of reinforcement required;
As_des = m’ / (z × fy / γm) = 1383 mm /m
Minimum area of reinforcement required;
As_min = 0.0013 × h = 325 mm /m
Area of reinforcement required;
As_req = max(As_des, As_min) = 1383 mm /m
2
2
Provide 20 dia bars @ 200 centres
Area of reinforcement provided;
2
2
As_prov = π × D / (4 × s) = 1571 mm /m
PASS - Support reinforcement is OK
Corner column A1
Depth of reinforcement;
d’ = 206 mm
Total load on column;
S = ((Spanx / 2) + ex) × ((Spany / 2) + ey) × Nult = 247 kN
Area of column head;
A = lx × ly1 = 0.100 m
Support moment;
m’ = S × (1 – (Nult × A / S) ) / 2 = 99.639 kNm/m
Lever arm;
K’ = 0.402 × (βb – 0.4) – 0.18 × (βb – 0.4) = 0.176
2
1/3
2
2
K = m’ / (d’ × fcu) = 0.067
Compression reinforcement is not required
z = min((0.5 + √(0.25 – (K / 0.9))), 0.95) × d’ = 189.3 mm
2
Area of reinforcement required;
As_des = m’ / (z × fy / γm) = 1211 mm /m
Minimum area of reinforcement required;
As_min = 0.0013 × h = 325 mm /m
Area of reinforcement required;
As_req = max(As_des, As_min) = 1211 mm /m
2
2
Provide 16 dia bars @ 150 centres
Area of reinforcement provided;
2
2
As_prov = π × D / (4 × s) = 1340 mm /m
PASS - Support reinforcement is OK
Edge column A2, A3
Depth of reinforcement;
d’ = 202 mm
Total load on column;
S = Spanx × (Spany / 2 + ey) × Nult = 477 kN
Area of column head;
A = lx1 × ly = 0.100 m
Support moment;
m’ = S × (1 – (Nult × A / S) ) / 5.14 = 78.476 kNm/m
Lever arm;
K’ = 0.402 × (βb – 0.4) – 0.18 × (βb – 0.4) = 0.176
2
1/3
2
2
K = m’ / (d’ × fcu) = 0.055
Compression reinforcement is not required
z = min((0.5 + √(0.25 – (K / 0.9))), 0.95) × d’ = 188.8 mm
Area of reinforcement required;
2
As_des = m’ / (z × fy / γm) = 956 mm /m
2
Minimum area of reinforcement required;
As_min = 0.0013 × h = 325 mm /m
Area of reinforcement required;
As_req = max(As_des, As_min) = 956 mm /m
2
Provide 16 dia bars @ 175 centres
Area of reinforcement provided;
2
2
As_prov = π × D / (4 × s) = 1149 mm /m
5
6. Job Ref.
Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
18/01/2014
App'd by
Date
PASS - Support reinforcement is OK
Between columns 1-2, 2-3
Around the perimeter between the column heads provide a minimum of 50% of the required end span bottom
reinforcement.
Area of reinforcement required;
2
As_req = Asx1 / 2 = 1047 mm /m
Provide 16 dia bars @ 150 centres - 'U' bars with 1600 mm long legs
Area of reinforcement provided;
2
2
As_prov = π × D / (4 × s) = 1340 mm /m
PASS - Edge reinforcement is OK
Distribution reinforcement
Provide 12 dia bars @ 300 centres
Area of reinforcement provided;
2
2
As_prov = π × D / (4 × s) = 377 mm /m
DESIGN SLAB IN THE Y-DIRECTION
SAGGING MOMENTS
End bay 1-2
Effective span;
L = 7000 mm
Depth of reinforcement;
d = 220 mm
Midspan moment;
m = (Nult × L ) / (2 × (1 + √(1 + i)) ) = 74.823 kNm/m
Support moment;
m’ = i × m = 74.823 kNm/m
2
2
Design reinforcement
Lever arm;
2
K’ = 0.402 × (βb – 0.4) – 0.18 × (βb – 0.4) = 0.176
2
K = m / (d × fcu) = 0.044
Compression reinforcement is not required
z = min((0.5 + √(0.25 – (K / 0.9))), 0.95) × d = 208.6 mm
2
Area of reinforcement designed;
As_des = m / (z × fy / γm) = 825 mm /m
Minimum area of reinforcement required;
As_min = 0.0013 × h = 325 mm /m
Area of reinforcement required;
As_req = max(As_des, As_min) = 825 mm /m
2
2
Provide 20 dia bars @ 200 centres
Area of reinforcement provided;
2
2
As_prov = π × D / (4 × s) = 1571 mm /m
PASS - Span reinforcement is OK
Check deflection
2
Design service stress;
fs = 2 × fy × As_req / (3 × As_prov × βb) = 175 N/mm
Modification factor;
k1 = min(0.55+(477N/mm -fs)/(120×(0.9N/mm +(m/d ))),2) = 1.579
Allowable span to depth ratio;
0.9 × 26 × k1 = 36.942
Actual span to depth ratio;
L / d = 31.818
2
2
2
PASS - Span to depth ratio is OK
Internal bay 2-3
Effective span;
L = 6800 mm
6
7. Job Ref.
Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
18/01/2014
App'd by
Date
Depth of reinforcement;
d = 222 mm
Midspan moment;
m = (Nult × L ) / (2 × (√(1 + i) + √(1 + i)) ) = 51.442 kNm/m
Support moment;
m’ = i × m = 51.442 kNm/m
2
2
Design reinforcement
Lever arm;
2
K’ = 0.402 × (βb – 0.4) – 0.18 × (βb – 0.4) = 0.176
2
K = m / (d × fcu) = 0.030
Compression reinforcement is not required
z = min((0.5 + √(0.25 – (K / 0.9))), 0.95) × d = 210.9 mm
2
Area of reinforcement designed;
As_des = m / (z × fy / γm) = 561 mm /m
Minimum area of reinforcement required;
As_min = 0.0013 × h = 325 mm /m
Area of reinforcement required;
As_req = max(As_des, As_min) = 561 mm /m
2
2
Provide 16 dia bars @ 200 centres
Area of reinforcement provided;
2
2
As_prov = π × D / (4 × s) = 1005 mm /m
PASS - Span reinforcement is OK
Check deflection
2
Design service stress;
fs = 2 × fy × As_req / (3 × As_prov × βb) = 186 N/mm
Modification factor;
k1 = min(0.55+(477N/mm -fs)/(120×(0.9N/mm +(m/d ))),2) = 1.798
Allowable span to depth ratio;
0.9 × 26 × k1 = 42.062
Actual span to depth ratio;
L / d = 30.631
2
2
2
PASS - Span to depth ratio is OK
HOGGING MOMENTS – INTERNAL STRIP
Penultimate column C2
Consider the reinforcement concentrated in half width strip over the support
Depth of reinforcement;
d’ = 220 mm
Support moment;
m’ = 2 × i × m = 149.646 kNm/m
Lever arm;
K’ = 0.402 × (βb – 0.4) – 0.18 × (βb – 0.4) = 0.176
2
2
K = m’ / (d’ × fcu) = 0.088
Compression reinforcement is not required
z = min((0.5 + √(0.25 – (K / 0.9))), 0.95) × d’ = 195.7 mm
Area of reinforcement required;
2
As_des = m’ / (z × fy / γm) = 1758 mm /m
2
Minimum area of reinforcement required;
As_min = 0.0013 × h = 325 mm /m
Area of reinforcement required;
As_req = max(As_des, As_min) = 1758 mm /m
2
Provide 20 dia bars @ 150 centres
Area of reinforcement provided;
2
2
As_prov = π × D / (4 × s) = 2094 mm /m
PASS - Support reinforcement is OK
Internal column C3
Consider the reinforcement concentrated in half width strip over the support
Depth of reinforcement;
d’ = 220 mm
7
8. Job Ref.
Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
18/01/2014
App'd by
Support moment;
m’ = 2 × i × m = 102.884 kNm/m
Lever arm;
Date
K’ = 0.402 × (βb – 0.4) – 0.18 × (βb – 0.4) = 0.176
2
2
K = m’ / (d’ × fcu) = 0.061
Compression reinforcement is not required
z = min((0.5 + √(0.25 – (K / 0.9))), 0.95) × d’ = 204.0 mm
Area of reinforcement required;
2
As_des = m’ / (z × fy / γm) = 1160 mm /m
2
Minimum area of reinforcement required;
As_min = 0.0013 × h = 325 mm /m
Area of reinforcement required;
As_req = max(As_des, As_min) = 1160 mm /m
2
Provide 20 dia bars @ 200 centres
Area of reinforcement provided;
2
2
As_prov = π × D / (4 × s) = 1571 mm /m
PASS - Support reinforcement is OK
HOGGING MOMENTS – EXTERNAL STRIP
Penultimate column A2, B2
Consider one and a half bays of negative moment being resisted over the edge and penultimate column
Width of span;
B = 7200 mm
Edge distance;
e = 125 mm
Depth of reinforcement;
d’ = 220 mm
Support moment;
m’ = m × i ×(e + B + B / 2) / ((0.5 × B) + (0.2 × B) + e) = 158.265
kNm/m
Lever arm;
2
K’ = 0.402 × (βb – 0.4) – 0.18 × (βb – 0.4) = 0.176
2
K = m’ / (d’ × fcu) = 0.093
Compression reinforcement is not required
z = min((0.5 + √(0.25 – (K / 0.9))), 0.95) × d’ = 194.1 mm
Area of reinforcement required;
2
As_des = m’ / (z × fy / γm) = 1875 mm /m
2
Minimum area of reinforcement required;
As_min = 0.0013 × h = 325 mm /m
Area of reinforcement required;
As_req = max(As_des, As_min) = 1875 mm /m
2
Provide 20 dia bars @ 150 centres
Area of reinforcement provided;
2
2
As_prov = π × D / (4 × s) = 2094 mm /m
PASS - Support reinforcement is OK
Internal column A3, B3
Consider one and a half bays of negative moment being resisted over the edge and penultimate column
Width of span;
B = 7200 mm
Edge distance;
e = 125 mm
Depth of reinforcement;
d’ = 220 mm
Support moment;
m’ = m × i ×(e + B + B / 2) / ((0.5 × B) + (0.2 × B) + e) = 108.810
kNm/m
Lever arm;
2
K’ = 0.402 × (βb – 0.4) – 0.18 × (βb – 0.4) = 0.176
2
K = m’ / (d’ × fcu) = 0.064
8
9. Job Ref.
Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
18/01/2014
App'd by
Date
Compression reinforcement is not required
z = min((0.5 + √(0.25 – (K / 0.9))), 0.95) × d’ = 203.0 mm
2
Area of reinforcement required;
As_des = m’ / (z × fy / γm) = 1233 mm /m
Minimum area of reinforcement required;
As_min = 0.0013 × h = 325 mm /m
Area of reinforcement required;
As_req = max(As_des, As_min) = 1233 mm /m
2
2
Provide 20 dia bars @ 200 centres
Area of reinforcement provided;
2
2
As_prov = π × D / (4 × s) = 1571 mm /m
PASS - Support reinforcement is OK
Edge column B1, C1
Depth of reinforcement;
d’ = 222 mm
Total load on column;
S = (Spanx / 2 + ex) × Spany × Nult = 477 kN
Area of column head;
A = ly1 × lx = 0.100 m
Support moment;
m’ = S × (1 – (Nult × A / S) ) / 5.14 = 78.476 kNm/m
Lever arm;
K’ = 0.402 × (βb – 0.4) – 0.18 × (βb – 0.4) = 0.176
2
1/3
2
2
K = m’ / (d’ × fcu) = 0.045
Compression reinforcement is not required
z = min((0.5 + √(0.25 – (K / 0.9))), 0.95) × d’ = 210.1 mm
2
Area of reinforcement required;
As_des = m’ / (z × fy / γm) = 859 mm /m
Minimum area of reinforcement required;
As_min = 0.0013 × h = 325 mm /m
Area of reinforcement required;
As_req = max(As_des, As_min) = 859 mm /m
2
2
Provide 16 dia bars @ 175 centres
Area of reinforcement provided;
2
2
As_prov = π × D / (4 × s) = 1149 mm /m
PASS - Support reinforcement is OK
Between columns A-B, B-C
Around the perimeter between the column heads provide a minimum of 50% of the required end span bottom
reinforcement.
Area of reinforcement required;
2
As_req = Asy1 / 2 = 785 mm /m
Provide 16 dia bars @ 200 centres - 'U' bars with 1600 mm long legs
Area of reinforcement provided;
2
2
As_prov = π × D / (4 × s) = 1005 mm /m
PASS - Edge reinforcement is OK
PUNCHING SHEAR
Corner column A1
Design shear transferred to column;
Vt = ((0.45 × Spanx) + ex) × ((0.45 × Spany) + ey) × Nult = 202 kN
Design effective shear transferred to column;
Veff = 1.25 × Vt = 252 kN
Area of tension steel in x-direction;
Asx_ten = Ascorner = 1340 mm /m
Area of tension steel in y-direction;
Asy_ten = Ascorner = 1340 mm /m
Column perimeter;
uc = lx1 + ly = 650 mm
Average effective depth of reinforcement;
d = h – c - φp = 214 mm
2
2
9
10. Job Ref.
Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Date
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Chk'd by
Date
18/01/2014
Maximum allowable shear stress;
vmax = min(0.8 × √(fcu), 5) = 4.733 N/mm
Design shear stress at column perimeter;
v0 = Veff / (uc × d) = 1.811 N/mm
App'd by
Date
2
2
PASS - Maximum concrete shear stress not exceeded at column perimeter
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 1.50d - (321 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 1292 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 1731 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.707 N/mm
2
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
v = Veff / (u × d) = 0.911 N/mm
Shear reinforcement required at perimeter;
Asv_req = (v - vc) × u × d / (0.95 × fyv) = 119 mm
vc < v <= 1.6 × vc
2
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 2.25d - (482 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 1613 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 2161 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.707 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 0.730 N/mm
vc < v <= 1.6 × vc
Shear reinforcement required at perimeter;
2
Asv_req = (v - vc) × u × d / (0.95 × fyv) = 16 mm
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 3.00d - (642 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 1934 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 2592 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.707 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 0.609 N/mm
v < vc no shear reinforcement required
Penultimate edge column A2
Design shear transferred to column;
Vt = ((0.45 × Spanx) + ex) × (1.05 × Spany) × Nult = 453 kN
Design effective shear transferred to column;
Veff = 1.4 × Vt = 634 kN
Area of tension steel in x-direction;
Asx_ten = Asx_edge = 1148 mm /m
2
10
11. Job Ref.
Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Date
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Chk'd by
Date
18/01/2014
App'd by
Date
2
Area of tension steel in y-direction;
Asy_ten = Asy1e = 2094 mm /m
Column perimeter;
uc = (2 × lx1)+ ly = 900 mm
Average effective depth of reinforcement;
d = h – c - φp = 214 mm
Maximum allowable shear stress;
vmax = min(0.8 × √(fcu), 5) = 4.733 N/mm
Design shear stress at column perimeter;
v0 = Veff / (uc × d) = 3.292 N/mm
2
2
PASS - Maximum concrete shear stress not exceeded at column perimeter
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 1.50d - (321 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 2184 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 3588 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.757 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 1.356 N/mm
1.6 × vc < v <= 2 × vc
Shear reinforcement required at perimeter;
Asv_req = 5 × ((0.7 × v) - vc) × u × d / (0.95 × fyv) = 947 mm
2
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 2.25d - (482 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 2826 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 4628 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.756 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 1.048 N/mm
vc < v <= 1.6 × vc
Shear reinforcement required at perimeter;
2
Asv_req = (v - vc) × u × d / (0.95 × fyv) = 372 mm
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 3.00d - (642 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 3468 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 5669 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.756 N/mm
2
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
v = Veff / (u × d) = 0.854 N/mm
Shear reinforcement required at perimeter;
Asv_req = (v - vc) × u × d / (0.95 × fyv) = 154 mm
vc < v <= 1.6 × vc
2
11
12. Job Ref.
Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Date
Calc. by
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Chk'd by
Date
18/01/2014
App'd by
Date
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 3.75d - (803 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 4110 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 6710 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.755 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 0.721 N/mm
v < vc no shear reinforcement required
Internal edge column A3
Design shear transferred to column;
Vt = ((0.45 × Spanx) + ex) × Spany × Nult = 431 kN
Design effective shear transferred to column;
Veff = 1.4 × Vt = 604 kN
Area of tension steel in x-direction;
Asx_ten = Asx_edge = 1148 mm /m
2
2
Area of tension steel in y-direction;
Asy_ten = Asye = 1570 mm /m
Column perimeter;
uc = (2 × lx1)+ ly = 900 mm
Average effective depth of reinforcement;
d = h – c - φp = 214 mm
Maximum allowable shear stress;
vmax = min(0.8 × √(fcu), 5) = 4.733 N/mm
Design shear stress at column perimeter;
v0 = Veff / (uc × d) = 3.135 N/mm
2
2
PASS - Maximum concrete shear stress not exceeded at column perimeter
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 1.50d - (321 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 2184 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 2989 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.712 N/mm
2
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
v = Veff / (u × d) = 1.292 N/mm
Shear reinforcement required at perimeter;
Asv_req = 5 × ((0.7 × v) - vc) × u × d / (0.95 × fyv) = 945 mm
1.6 × vc < v <= 2 × vc
2
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 2.25d - (482 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 2826 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 3862 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.712 N/mm
12
13. Job Ref.
Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
18/01/2014
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
App'd by
Date
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 0.998 N/mm
vc < v <= 1.6 × vc
Shear reinforcement required at perimeter;
2
Asv_req = (v - vc) × u × d / (0.95 × fyv) = 365 mm
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 3.00d - (642 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 3468 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 4734 mm2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.712 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 0.814 N/mm
vc < v <= 1.6 × vc
Shear reinforcement required at perimeter;
2
Asv_req = (v - vc) × u × d / (0.95 × fyv) = 159 mm
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 3.75d - (803 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 4110 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 5607 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.711 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 0.686 N/mm
v < vc no shear reinforcement required
Penultimate edge column B1
Design shear transferred to column;
Vt = (1.05 × Spanx) × ((0.45 × Spany) + ey) × Nult = 453 kN
Design effective shear transferred to column;
Veff = 1.4 × Vt = 634 kN
Area of tension steel in x-direction;
Asx_ten = Asx1e = 2513 mm /m
Area of tension steel in y-direction;
Asy_ten = Asy_edge = 1148 mm /m
2
2
Column perimeter;
uc = lx + (2 × ly1) = 900 mm
Average effective depth of reinforcement;
d = h – c - φp = 214 mm
Maximum allowable shear stress;
vmax = min(0.8 × √(fcu), 5) = 4.733 N/mm
Design shear stress at column perimeter;
v0 = Veff / (uc × d) = 3.292 N/mm
2
2
PASS - Maximum concrete shear stress not exceeded at column perimeter
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 1.50d - (321 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 2184 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 4066 mm
2
13
14. Job Ref.
Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
18/01/2014
App'd by
Date
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.789 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 1.356 N/mm
1.6 × vc < v <= 2 × vc
Shear reinforcement required at perimeter;
Asv_req = 5 × ((0.7 × v) - vc) × u × d / (0.95 × fyv) = 789 mm
2
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 2.25d - (482 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 2826 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 5241 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.788 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 1.048 N/mm
vc < v <= 1.6 × vc
Shear reinforcement required at perimeter;
2
Asv_req = (v - vc) × u × d / (0.95 × fyv) = 331 mm
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 3.00d - (642 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 3468 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 6416 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.788 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 0.854 N/mm
vc < v <= 1.6 × vc
Shear reinforcement required at perimeter;
2
Asv_req = (v - vc) × u × d / (0.95 × fyv) = 104 mm
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 3.75d - (803 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 4110 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 7592 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.787 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 0.721 N/mm
v < vc no shear reinforcement required
14
15. Job Ref.
Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
18/01/2014
App'd by
Date
Penultimate central column B2
Design shear transferred to column;
Vt = (1.05 × Spanx) × (1.05 × Spany) × Nult = 1017 kN
Design effective shear transferred to column;
Veff = 1.15 × Vt = 1170 kN
Area of tension steel in x-direction;
Asx_ten = Asx1e = 2513 mm /m
Area of tension steel in y-direction;
Asy_ten = Asy1e = 2094 mm /m
2
2
Column perimeter;
uc = 2 × (lx + ly) = 1600 mm
Average effective depth of reinforcement;
d = h – c - φp = 214 mm
Maximum allowable shear stress;
vmax = min(0.8 × √(fcu), 5) = 4.733 N/mm
Design shear stress at column perimeter;
v0 = Veff / (uc × d) = 3.417 N/mm
2
2
PASS - Maximum concrete shear stress not exceeded at column perimeter
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 1.50d - (321 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 4168 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 9601 mm2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.847 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 1.312 N/mm
vc < v <= 1.6 × vc
Shear reinforcement required at perimeter;
2
Asv_req = (v - vc) × u × d / (0.95 × fyv) = 872 mm
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 2.25d - (482 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 5452 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 12559 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.847 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 1.003 N/mm
vc < v <= 1.6 × vc
Shear reinforcement required at perimeter;
2
Asv_req = (v - vc) × u × d / (0.95 × fyv) = 382 mm
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 3.00d - (642 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 6736 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 15516 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
15
16. Job Ref.
Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Date
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Chk'd by
Date
18/01/2014
App'd by
Date
2
vc = 0.847 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 0.812 N/mm
v < vc no shear reinforcement required
Internal central column B3
Design shear transferred to column;
Vt = (1.05 × Spanx) × Spany × Nult = 969 kN
Design effective shear transferred to column;
Veff = 1.15 × Vt = 1114 kN
Area of tension steel in x-direction;
Asx_ten = Asx1i = 2094 mm /m
2
2
Area of tension steel in y-direction;
Asy_ten = Asye = 1570 mm /m
Column perimeter;
uc = 2 × (lx + ly) = 1600 mm
Average effective depth of reinforcement;
d = h – c - φp = 214 mm
Maximum allowable shear stress;
vmax = min(0.8 × √(fcu), 5) = 4.733 N/mm
Design shear stress at column perimeter;
v0 = Veff / (uc × d) = 3.254 N/mm
2
2
PASS - Maximum concrete shear stress not exceeded at column perimeter
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 1.50d - (321 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 4168 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 7636 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.785 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 1.249 N/mm
vc < v <= 1.6 × vc
Shear reinforcement required at perimeter;
2
Asv_req = (v - vc) × u × d / (0.95 × fyv) = 872 mm
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 2.25d - (482 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 5452 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 9988 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.785 N/mm
2
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
v = Veff / (u × d) = 0.955 N/mm
Shear reinforcement required at perimeter;
Asv_req = (v - vc) × u × d / (0.95 × fyv) = 418 mm
vc < v <= 1.6 × vc
2
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 3.00d - (642 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 6736 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
16
17. Job Ref.
Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Date
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Chk'd by
Date
18/01/2014
As_ten = 12340 mm
App'd by
Date
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.785 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 0.773 N/mm
v < vc no shear reinforcement required
Internal edge column C1
Design shear transferred to column;
Vt = Spanx × ((0.45 × Spany) + ey) × Nult = 431 kN
Design effective shear transferred to column;
Veff = 1.4 × Vt = 604 kN
Area of tension steel in x-direction;
Asx_ten = Asxe = 1570 mm /m
Area of tension steel in y-direction;
Asy_ten = Asy_edge = 1148 mm /m
Column perimeter;
uc = lx + (2 × ly1) = 900 mm
2
2
(Library item: Flat slab shear map C1)
d = h – c - φp = 214 mm
Average effective depth of reinforcement;
Maximum allowable shear stress;
vmax = min(0.8 × √(fcu), 5) = 4.733 N/mm
Design shear stress at column perimeter;
v0 = Veff / (uc × d) = 3.135 N/mm
2
2
PASS - Maximum concrete shear stress not exceeded at column perimeter
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 1.50d - (321 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 2184 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 2989 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.712 N/mm
2
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
v = Veff / (u × d) = 1.292 N/mm
Shear reinforcement required at perimeter;
Asv_req = 5 × ((0.7 × v) - vc) × u × d / (0.95 × fyv) = 945 mm
1.6 × vc < v <= 2 × vc
2
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 2.25d - (482 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 2826 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 3862 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.712 N/mm
2
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
v = Veff / (u × d) = 0.998 N/mm
Shear reinforcement required at perimeter;
Asv_req = (v - vc) × u × d / (0.95 × fyv) = 365 mm
vc < v <= 1.6 × vc
2
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 3.00d - (642 mm)
17
18. Job Ref.
Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
18/01/2014
App'd by
Date
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 3468 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 4734 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.712 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 0.814 N/mm
vc < v <= 1.6 × vc
Shear reinforcement required at perimeter;
2
Asv_req = (v - vc) × u × d / (0.95 × fyv) = 159 mm
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 3.75d - (803 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 4110 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 5607 mm2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.711 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 0.686 N/mm
v < vc no shear reinforcement required
Internal central column C2
Design shear transferred to column;
Vt = Spanx × (1.05 × Spany) × Nult = 969 kN
Design effective shear transferred to column;
Veff = 1.15 × Vt = 1114 kN
Area of tension steel in x-direction;
Asx_ten = Asxe = 1570 mm /m
Area of tension steel in y-direction;
Asy_ten = Asy1i = 2094 mm /m
2
2
Column perimeter;
uc = 2 × (lx + ly) = 1600 mm
Average effective depth of reinforcement;
d = h – c - φp = 214 mm
Maximum allowable shear stress;
vmax = min(0.8 × √(fcu), 5) = 4.733 N/mm
Design shear stress at column perimeter;
v0 = Veff / (uc × d) = 3.254 N/mm
2
2
PASS - Maximum concrete shear stress not exceeded at column perimeter
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 1.50d - (321 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 4168 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 7636 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.785 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 1.249 N/mm
18
19. Job Ref.
Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Date
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Chk'd by
Date
18/01/2014
App'd by
Date
vc < v <= 1.6 × vc
Shear reinforcement required at perimeter;
2
Asv_req = (v - vc) × u × d / (0.95 × fyv) = 872 mm
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 2.25d - (482 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 5452 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 9988 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.785 N/mm
2
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
v = Veff / (u × d) = 0.955 N/mm
Shear reinforcement required at perimeter;
Asv_req = (v - vc) × u × d / (0.95 × fyv) = 418 mm
vc < v <= 1.6 × vc
2
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 3.00d - (642 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 6736 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 12340 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.785 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 0.773 N/mm
v < vc no shear reinforcement required
Internal column C3
Design shear transferred to column;
Vt = Spanx × Spany × Nult = 923 kN
Design effective shear transferred to column;
Veff = 1.15 × Vt = 1061 kN
Area of tension steel in x-direction;
Asx_ten = Asxi = 1570 mm /m
Area of tension steel in y-direction;
Asy_ten = Asyi = 1570 mm /m
Column perimeter;
uc = 2 × (lx + ly) = 1600 mm
2
2
Average effective depth of reinforcement;
d = h – c - φp = 214 mm
Maximum allowable shear stress;
vmax = min(0.8 × √(fcu), 5) = 4.733 N/mm
Design shear stress at column perimeter;
v0 = Veff / (uc × d) = 3.099 N/mm
2
2
PASS - Maximum concrete shear stress not exceeded at column perimeter
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 1.50d - (321 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 4168 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 6544 mm
2
19
20. Job Ref.
Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Date
Chk'd by
Date
18/01/2014
App'd by
Date
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.746 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 1.190 N/mm
vc < v <= 1.6 × vc
Shear reinforcement required at perimeter;
2
Asv_req = (v - vc) × u × d / (0.95 × fyv) = 834 mm
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 2.25d - (482 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 5452 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 8560 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.746 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 0.910 N/mm
vc < v <= 1.6 × vc
Shear reinforcement required at perimeter;
2
Asv_req = (v - vc) × u × d / (0.95 × fyv) = 403 mm
Shear reinforcement at a perimeter of 3.00d - (642 mm)
Length of shear perimeter;
u = uc + (2 × (kx × ky) × k × d) = 6736 mm
Area of tension steel at shear perimeter;
As_ten = (ky × (px + (kx × k × d)) × Asy_ten) + (kx × (py + (ky × k × d)) ×
Asx_ten)
As_ten = 10576 mm
2
Design concrete shear stress;
1/3
1/3
1/4
vc=(min(fcu,40)/25) ×0.79×min(100×As_ten/(u×d),3) ×max(400/d,1) /1.25
2
vc = 0.746 N/mm
Nominal design shear stress at perimeter;
2
v = Veff / (u × d) = 0.736 N/mm
v < vc no shear reinforcement required
CURTAILMENT OF REINFORCEMENT
Internal column
Radius of circular yield line;
1/2
r = (lx × ly / π)
1/3
× (1.05 × Spanx × 1.05 × Spany / (lx × ly))
= 1601
mm
Minimum curtailment length in x-direction;
lint_x = Max(r + 12 × D, 0.25 × Spanx) = 1841 mm
Minimum curtailment length in y-direction;
lint_y = Max(r + 12 × D, 0.25 × Spany) = 1841 mm
Corner column
Radius of yield line;
ly))
r = (lx1 × ly / π)
1/2
× ((0.45 × Spanx + ex) × (0.45 × Spany + ey)/ (lx1 ×
1/3
r = 863 mm
Minimum curtailment length in x-direction;
lcorner_x = Max(r + 12 × D, 0.2 × Spanx) = 1440 mm
20
21. Job Ref.
Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Minimum curtailment length in y-direction;
Date
Chk'd by
Date
18/01/2014
App'd by
Date
lcorner_y = Max(r + 12 × D, 0.2 × Spany) = 1440 mm
Edge columns
Radius of yield line in x-direction;
ly))
r = (lx1 × ly / π)
1/2
× ((0.45 × Spanx + ex) × (1.05 × Spany) / (lx1 ×
1/3
r = 1130 mm
Minimum curtailment length in x-direction;
ledge_x = Max(r + 12 × D, 0.2 × Spanx) = 1440 mm
Radius of yield line in y-direction;
r = (lx × ly1 / π)
1/2
× ((0.45 × Spany + ey) × (1.05 × Spanx) / (lx ×
1/3
ly1))
r = 1130 mm
Minimum curtailment length in y-direction;
ledge_y = Max(r + 12 × D, 0.2 × Spany) = 1440 mm
21
22. Job Ref.
Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Date
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Chk'd by
Date
18/01/2014
B
A
ex
1
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
ey
Span x
n
l y1
e
s
n
Date
C
Span x
l x1
App'd by
f
s
r
0.2 x Spany
s
r
Span y
c
a
b
q
e
x
2
j
j
Span y
x
f
ly
0.5 x Spany
p
l
q
d
p
g
h
3
k
m
k
q
0.2 x Spanx
lx
0.5 x Spanx
When the effective span in the x direction, Lx, is greater than the effective span in the y direction, Ly, the
reinforcement in the outer layer is assumed to be that in the x direction otherwise it is assumed to be that in the y
direction.
22
23. Flat Slab Analysis & Design, In accordance with
BS8110:PART 1:1997
Project:
Section
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering Consulting Company for
Structural Engineering, Soil Mechanics, Rock Mechanics,
Foundation Engineering & Retaining Structures.
Tel.: (+30) 210 5238127, 210 5711263 - Fax.:+30 210 5711461 Mobile: (+30) 6936425722 & (+44) 7585939944, costas@sachpazis.info
Sheet no./rev. 1
Civil & Geotechnical Engineering
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis
Date
Calc. by
Dr. C. Sachpazis
Job Ref.
Chk'd by
18/01/2014
Date
App'd by
Date
REINFORCEMENT KEY
2
a = 20 dia bars @ 150 centres - (2094 mm /m);
2
b = 16 dia bars @ 200 centres - (1005 mm /m)
2
c = 20 dia bars @ 200 centres - (1570 mm /m);
2
d = 16 dia bars @ 200 centres - (1005 mm /m)
2
e = 20 dia bars @ 125 centres - (2513 mm /m);
2
f = 20 dia bars @ 200 centres - (1570 mm /m)
2
g = 20 dia bars @ 150 centres - (2094 mm /m);
2
h = 20 dia bars @ 200 centres - (1570 mm /m)
2
j = 20 dia bars @ 150 centres - (2094 mm /m);
2
k = 20 dia bars @ 200 centres - (1570 mm /m)
2
l = 20 dia bars @ 150 centres - (2094 mm /m);
2
m = 20 dia bars @ 200 centres - (1570 mm /m)
2
n = 16 dia bars @ 150 centres - (1340 mm /m)
2
p = 16 dia bars @ 175 centres - (1148 mm /m);
2
q = 16 dia bars @ 150 centres - (1340 mm /m)
2
r = 16 dia bars @ 175 centres - (1148 mm /m);
2
s = 16 dia bars @ 200 centres - (1005 mm /m)
2
Distribution bars = 12 dia bars @ 300 centres - (377 mm /m)
Shear reinforcement is required - Refer to output above for details.
23