Kevin Manaugh presented on factors that influence walking behavior. He discussed how walkability is affected by both the built environment and personal characteristics like motivations, needs, and culture. Manaugh identified different clusters of walkers based on their motivations and found their satisfaction varied by distance, with some groups more satisfied by longer walks. He concluded policies to increase walking should consider both infrastructure and appealing to different motivations to improve satisfaction and mode share equitably.
Развиване на велосипедния транспорт в Кралство Нидерландия. Презентация на Том Ходефрой по време на работното ателие "Мисли велосипедно", 5-6.02.2013г., гр. София. Част от проекта "Всички на колела"
Development of 'State-of-Art' Building Energy Dashboard: The C3 Dashboardruchiek
A building energy dashboard could be a tool to influence users to be
more environmentally conscious by displaying real-time energy
consumption. Current commercially available dashboards fall short of
their potential as they do not simultaneously address occupant
comfort, case specific recommendations or controls. To address this
gap, a prototype has been developed for a new ‘state-of-art’
dashboard, the “C3” dashboard. C3 is a common platform for
communication, consultancy and control. It is designed to be a
personal dashboard for users in commercial buildings. This study
presents the opportunities and challenges of developing a user-based
energy dashboard that would empower occupants to save more energy.
Why Walking and Walkability? The Latest Info to Make the Case
This session will provide an overview of the latest data and studies highlighting the multiple benefits of walking, including in the areas of health, the environment, economic vibrancy and quality of life.
Presenters:
Presenter: Kate Kraft America Walks
Co-Presenter: Scott Bricker America Walks
Co-Presenter: Joan Dorn Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC)
Co-Presenter: Paul Heberling Office of Safety, Energy, and Environment, Office of the Secretary US DOT
Co-Presenter: Thomas Schmid Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
This presentation on Walkability is for a upcoming seminar/charrette hosted by the Town of Collierville, Tn. There is a particular focus on block design as one of the key components of a wlakable neighborhood.
Stowe Vision Plan: Wayfinding and Placemakingruchiek
This document summarizes information about Stowe Township, including:
1) Stowe Township is located along the Ohio River near Pittsburgh, with a business district along Broadway Street between 5th and 9th Streets. It has a population of around 6,700 people with lower incomes and home ownership rates compared to Pittsburgh overall.
2) Stowe has a rich history dating back to the 1800s and still retains some of its original historic buildings and architecture from that time period.
3) Current plans and initiatives aim to improve the business district, attract new businesses and jobs, develop community activities, and enhance safety and beautification while preserving the historic character.
This document summarizes user research conducted by Team 29 for the M.o.M museum on wayfinding and lobby design. General research identified problems with the lobby being crowded and unclear, and patrons being unsure of which exhibits to visit. Research methods included guerrilla interviews with different types of visitors, an affinity diagram, and prototypes of the lobby and map that were tested with visitors. Testing of map prototypes found the best design had clear icons, orientation to help identify exhibits, and text on the left. The final recommendations were to avoid sideways text, increase font size, label floors, and put text on the left side of the map.
Aim, objective and methodology of transit oriented development (TOD)padamatikona swapnika
The document outlines the need, aim, objectives and methodology for a transit oriented development (TOD) project in an unnamed city. It identifies four main issues with the current transportation system: a lack of walkability to metro stations, safety concerns for women, overdependence on private vehicles, and environmental degradation. The aim is to encourage healthier living and better quality of life through high-density, mixed-use development near transit stations. The objectives section lists 15 goals for the TOD planning process including promoting multi-modal access, affordable housing, and environmental mitigation. The methodology has not been described.
Title: Level of Service F for Grade A Streets
Track: Prosper
Format: 90 minute panel
Abstract: Relying solely on Level of Service criteria for street design, which evaluates vehicle congestion, leads to poor outcomes on many of our roadways. LOS F, far from a failure, creates opportunities to reallocate roadway space for more livable street designs. In this session, learn about projects in Cambridge and San Francisco that overcame opposition and generated community support in prioritizing better bicycling and walking over vehicle capacity during the peak hour of travel.
Presenters:
Presenter: Michael Sallaberry San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency
Co-Presenter: Jeffrey Rosenblum City of Cambridge, MA
Развиване на велосипедния транспорт в Кралство Нидерландия. Презентация на Том Ходефрой по време на работното ателие "Мисли велосипедно", 5-6.02.2013г., гр. София. Част от проекта "Всички на колела"
Development of 'State-of-Art' Building Energy Dashboard: The C3 Dashboardruchiek
A building energy dashboard could be a tool to influence users to be
more environmentally conscious by displaying real-time energy
consumption. Current commercially available dashboards fall short of
their potential as they do not simultaneously address occupant
comfort, case specific recommendations or controls. To address this
gap, a prototype has been developed for a new ‘state-of-art’
dashboard, the “C3” dashboard. C3 is a common platform for
communication, consultancy and control. It is designed to be a
personal dashboard for users in commercial buildings. This study
presents the opportunities and challenges of developing a user-based
energy dashboard that would empower occupants to save more energy.
Why Walking and Walkability? The Latest Info to Make the Case
This session will provide an overview of the latest data and studies highlighting the multiple benefits of walking, including in the areas of health, the environment, economic vibrancy and quality of life.
Presenters:
Presenter: Kate Kraft America Walks
Co-Presenter: Scott Bricker America Walks
Co-Presenter: Joan Dorn Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC)
Co-Presenter: Paul Heberling Office of Safety, Energy, and Environment, Office of the Secretary US DOT
Co-Presenter: Thomas Schmid Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
This presentation on Walkability is for a upcoming seminar/charrette hosted by the Town of Collierville, Tn. There is a particular focus on block design as one of the key components of a wlakable neighborhood.
Stowe Vision Plan: Wayfinding and Placemakingruchiek
This document summarizes information about Stowe Township, including:
1) Stowe Township is located along the Ohio River near Pittsburgh, with a business district along Broadway Street between 5th and 9th Streets. It has a population of around 6,700 people with lower incomes and home ownership rates compared to Pittsburgh overall.
2) Stowe has a rich history dating back to the 1800s and still retains some of its original historic buildings and architecture from that time period.
3) Current plans and initiatives aim to improve the business district, attract new businesses and jobs, develop community activities, and enhance safety and beautification while preserving the historic character.
This document summarizes user research conducted by Team 29 for the M.o.M museum on wayfinding and lobby design. General research identified problems with the lobby being crowded and unclear, and patrons being unsure of which exhibits to visit. Research methods included guerrilla interviews with different types of visitors, an affinity diagram, and prototypes of the lobby and map that were tested with visitors. Testing of map prototypes found the best design had clear icons, orientation to help identify exhibits, and text on the left. The final recommendations were to avoid sideways text, increase font size, label floors, and put text on the left side of the map.
Aim, objective and methodology of transit oriented development (TOD)padamatikona swapnika
The document outlines the need, aim, objectives and methodology for a transit oriented development (TOD) project in an unnamed city. It identifies four main issues with the current transportation system: a lack of walkability to metro stations, safety concerns for women, overdependence on private vehicles, and environmental degradation. The aim is to encourage healthier living and better quality of life through high-density, mixed-use development near transit stations. The objectives section lists 15 goals for the TOD planning process including promoting multi-modal access, affordable housing, and environmental mitigation. The methodology has not been described.
Title: Level of Service F for Grade A Streets
Track: Prosper
Format: 90 minute panel
Abstract: Relying solely on Level of Service criteria for street design, which evaluates vehicle congestion, leads to poor outcomes on many of our roadways. LOS F, far from a failure, creates opportunities to reallocate roadway space for more livable street designs. In this session, learn about projects in Cambridge and San Francisco that overcame opposition and generated community support in prioritizing better bicycling and walking over vehicle capacity during the peak hour of travel.
Presenters:
Presenter: Michael Sallaberry San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency
Co-Presenter: Jeffrey Rosenblum City of Cambridge, MA
Title: A Systematic Approach to Bicycle Parking Planning for Cities
Track: Connect
Format: 60 minute panel
Abstract: Cambridge, MA and Washington, DC have taken a strategic approach to bicycle parking. This session will focus on their planning tools and lessons learned from both the public and private sector.
Presenters:
Presenter: Megan Kanagy Downtown DC Business Improvement District
Co-Presenter: Daniel Clark Dero Bike Rack Company
Co-Presenter: Jeffrey Rosenblum City of Cambridge, MA
Title: Level of Service F for Grade A Streets
Track: Prosper
Format: 90 minute panel
Abstract: Relying solely on Level of Service criteria for street design, which evaluates vehicle congestion, leads to poor outcomes on many of our roadways. LOS F, far from a failure, creates opportunities to reallocate roadway space for more livable street designs. In this session, learn about projects in Cambridge and San Francisco that overcame opposition and generated community support in prioritizing better bicycling and walking over vehicle capacity during the peak hour of travel.
Presenters:
Presenter: Michael Sallaberry San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency
Co-Presenter: Jeffrey Rosenblum City of Cambridge, MA
Title: Policies for Pupils: Working with School Boards on Walking and Bicycling Policies
Track: Change
Format: 90 minute panel
Abstract: Engaging schools in walking and bicycling efforts can be difficult given competing education priorities and frequent staff and volunteer turn-over. Attendees will learn about strategies for influencing school boards and policy opportunities at the district level.
Presenters:
Presenter: Sara Zimmerman Safe Routes to School National Partnership
Co-Presenter: Diane Dohm ChangeLab Solutions
Co-Presenter: Bree Romero Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
Co-Presenter: Leigh Ann Von Hagen Voorhees Transportation Center, Rutgers University
Title: Policies for Pupils: Working with School Boards on Walking and Bicycling Policies
Track: Change
Format: 90 minute panel
Abstract: Engaging schools in walking and bicycling efforts can be difficult given competing education priorities and frequent staff and volunteer turn-over. Attendees will learn about strategies for influencing school boards and policy opportunities at the district level.
Presenters:
Presenter: Sara Zimmerman Safe Routes to School National Partnership
Co-Presenter: Diane Dohm ChangeLab Solutions
Co-Presenter: Bree Romero Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
Co-Presenter: Leigh Ann Von Hagen Voorhees Transportation Center, Rutgers University
Title: Policies for Pupils: Working with School Boards on Walking and Bicycling Policies
Track: Change
Format: 90 minute panel
Abstract: Engaging schools in walking and bicycling efforts can be difficult given competing education priorities and frequent staff and volunteer turn-over. Attendees will learn about strategies for influencing school boards and policy opportunities at the district level.
Presenters:
Presenter: Sara Zimmerman Safe Routes to School National Partnership
Co-Presenter: Diane Dohm ChangeLab Solutions
Co-Presenter: Bree Romero Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
Co-Presenter: Leigh Ann Von Hagen Voorhees Transportation Center, Rutgers University
Title: 'Selling' Rural Communities on Cycling
Track: Prosper
Format: 60 minute panel
Abstract: This panel will share successful strategies and programs utilized in Oregon and Pennsylvania developed to leverage and promote the economic benefits of cycling in rural communities.
Presenters:
Presenter: Sheila Lyons Oregon DOT
Co-Presenter: Jessica Horning Oregon DOT
Co-Presenter: Cathy McCollom River Town Program
This document discusses livability, transportation alternative programs (TAP), and safe routes to school (SRTS) funding. It defines livability as tying transportation to access to jobs, housing, schools, and safe streets. TAP and SRTS funding can be used for byways projects like historic preservation, bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, and visitor centers. Examples of SRTS infrastructure projects include pedestrian bulb-outs, wider sidewalks, and underground utilities. Contact information is provided for livability, byways, and SRTS programs at the DOT.
The document discusses proposed updates to a city's zoning regulations regarding bicycle parking. It aims to increase the quantity and quality of bicycle parking required for new developments to better support the city's goal of 10% of trips by bicycle. The proposed changes would modify definitions, design standards, access requirements, and quantities of both long-term secured and short-term bicycle parking. It also allows for special permit modifications to requirements to accommodate new ideas and technologies.
Title: 'Selling' Rural Communities on Cycling
Track: Prosper
Format: 60 minute panel
Abstract: This panel will share successful strategies and programs utilized in Oregon and Pennsylvania developed to leverage and promote the economic benefits of cycling in rural communities.
Presenters:
Presenter: Sheila Lyons Oregon DOT
Co-Presenter: Jessica Horning Oregon DOT
Co-Presenter: Cathy McCollom River Town Program
Cycle Oregon provides grants from its $2 million fund to support projects in communities where its bicycle tours travel through and for statewide bicycling advocacy. It distributes around $100,000 annually in grants and gives approximately $130,000 yearly to communities that host its summer and September tours to help with event planning and volunteer support from residents, which are critical to the tours' success.
Title: A Systematic Approach to Bicycle Parking Planning for Cities
Track: Connect
Format: 60 minute panel
Abstract: Cambridge, MA and Washington, DC have taken a strategic approach to bicycle parking. This session will focus on their planning tools and lessons learned from both the public and private sector.
Presenters:
Presenter: Megan Kanagy Downtown DC Business Improvement District
Co-Presenter: Daniel Clark Dero Bike Rack Company
Co-Presenter: Jeffrey Rosenblum City of Cambridge, MA
Schedule:
Wednesday 9/10 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM in Breakout Rooms, 316
Title: Taking Pedestrian and Bicycle Counting Programs to the Next Level
Track: Connect
Format: 90 minute panel
Abstract: Panelists will provide practical guidance for pedestrian and bicycle counting programs based on findings from NCHRP Project 07-19, "Methods and Technologies for Collecting Pedestrian and Bicycle Volume Data."
Presenters:
Presenter: Robert Schneider University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Co-Presenter: RJ Eldridge Toole Design Group, LLC
Co-Presenter: Conor Semler Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Policies for Pupils: Working with School Boards on Walking and Bicycling Policies
Track: Change
Format: 90 minute panel
Abstract: Engaging schools in walking and bicycling efforts can be difficult given competing education priorities and frequent staff and volunteer turn-over. Attendees will learn about strategies for influencing school boards and policy opportunities at the district level.
Presenters:
Presenter: Sara Zimmerman Safe Routes to School National Partnership
Co-Presenter: Diane Dohm ChangeLab Solutions
Co-Presenter: Bree Romero Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
Co-Presenter: Leigh Ann Von Hagen Voorhees Transportation Center, Rutgers University
Federal Funding for Active Transportation and Recreation
Track: Connect
Format: 60 minute panel
Abstract: This session will provide an overview about federal transportation programs that can fund infrastructure for walking and bicycling.
Full Description: Federal programs provide funds to develop transportation, community, and recreation infrastructure for walking and bicycling and to connect communities and promote active living. Attendees will learn how about Federal programs to promote sustainable communities.
Learning Objectives:
Participants will learn about the Federal Partnership for Sustainable Communities.
Participants will learn about the Federal-aid surface transportation programs that benefit pedestrians and bicyclists.
Participants will be able to successfully write a competitive proposal.
Participants will understand how Federal, State, and local programs interact.
Presenter(s)
Presenter: Christopher Douwes Transportation Alternatives Program / Recreational Trails Program, FHWA
Co-Presenter: Wesley Blount Office of Planning, Environment & Realty FHWA
Title: Not Your Grandfather's DOT: The FDOT District 5 and PennDOT Experiences
Track: Connect
Format: 90 minute moderated discussion
Abstract: Today's economic realities require the rethinking of conventional transportation approaches. Learn about how Florida and Pennsylvania's Department of Transportation are using new tools, policies, and guides to proactively plan multi-modal transportation solutions.
Presenters:
Presenter: Jane Lim-Yap Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Co-Presenter: Steven Deck Parsons Brinckerhoff
Co-Presenter: Brian Hare PennDOT Program Center
Co-Presenter: Mary Raulerson Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Title: Not Your Grandfather's DOT: The FDOT District 5 and PennDOT Experiences
Track: Connect
Format: 90 minute moderated discussion
Abstract: Today's economic realities require the rethinking of conventional transportation approaches. Learn about how Florida and Pennsylvania's Department of Transportation are using new tools, policies, and guides to proactively plan multi-modal transportation solutions.
Presenters:
Presenter: Jane Lim-Yap Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Co-Presenter: Steven Deck Parsons Brinckerhoff
Co-Presenter: Brian Hare PennDOT Program Center
Co-Presenter: Mary Raulerson Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Title: Transportation Studies in the 21st Century: Incorporating all Modes
Track: Sustain
Format: 90 minute panel
Abstract: In the 21st century, the basic purpose of transportation studies needs to change from making it easier to drive to giving people options other than driving. This session will present case studies of alternatives to the auto-dominated Level of Service traffic impact studies in order to better address bicycling, transit and walking.
Presenters:
Presenter: Michelle DeRobertis Transportation Choices for Sustainable Communities
Co-Presenter: Peter Albert San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency
Co-Presenter: Patrick Lynch Transpo Group
Co-Presenter: David Thompson City of Boulder, Colorado
Title: Transportation Studies in the 21st Century: Incorporating all Modes
Track: Sustain
Format: 90 minute panel
Abstract: In the 21st century, the basic purpose of transportation studies needs to change from making it easier to drive to giving people options other than driving. This session will present case studies of alternatives to the auto-dominated Level of Service traffic impact studies in order to better address bicycling, transit and walking.
Presenters:
Presenter: Michelle DeRobertis Transportation Choices for Sustainable Communities
Co-Presenter: Peter Albert San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency
Co-Presenter: Patrick Lynch Transpo Group
Co-Presenter: David Thompson City of Boulder, Colorado
Title: Integrating a Health Impact Assessment into District-Wide School Travel Planning
Track: Prosper
Format: 60 minute panel
Abstract: Learn about how a Health Impact Assessment (HIA) was used for the first time to guide the formulation of the Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Columbus City Schools District-Wide School Travel Plan, which focused on schools and neighborhoods with health inequities.
Presenters:
Presenter: Brian Butler Columbus Public Health
Co-Presenter: Kate Moening Safe Routes to School National Partnership
Co-Presenter: Alex Smith Columbus Public Health
Co-Presenter: Julie Walcoff Ohio DOT
Title: Safer People, Safer Streets, and Safer Policies at USDOT
Track: Connect
Format: 90 minute moderated discussion
Abstract: This USDOT panel will provide details on the Department’s new bicycle and pedestrian safety initiative, including information on the Ped-Bike Safety Action Agenda, Road Safety for Transit Patrons initiative, bike-walk assessments, Road Diet Guide, an aggressive research agenda, and local partnerships, including how community members can get involved.
Presenters:
Presenter: Barbara McCann Office of Secretary, USDOT
Co-Presenter: Heidi Coleman National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Co-Presenter: Dan Goodman Office of Human Environment, Livability Team, FHWA
Co-Presenter: Joanne Waszczak Special Assistant, FTA Office of Budget and Policy
More Related Content
More from Project for Public Spaces & National Center for Biking and Walking
Title: A Systematic Approach to Bicycle Parking Planning for Cities
Track: Connect
Format: 60 minute panel
Abstract: Cambridge, MA and Washington, DC have taken a strategic approach to bicycle parking. This session will focus on their planning tools and lessons learned from both the public and private sector.
Presenters:
Presenter: Megan Kanagy Downtown DC Business Improvement District
Co-Presenter: Daniel Clark Dero Bike Rack Company
Co-Presenter: Jeffrey Rosenblum City of Cambridge, MA
Title: Level of Service F for Grade A Streets
Track: Prosper
Format: 90 minute panel
Abstract: Relying solely on Level of Service criteria for street design, which evaluates vehicle congestion, leads to poor outcomes on many of our roadways. LOS F, far from a failure, creates opportunities to reallocate roadway space for more livable street designs. In this session, learn about projects in Cambridge and San Francisco that overcame opposition and generated community support in prioritizing better bicycling and walking over vehicle capacity during the peak hour of travel.
Presenters:
Presenter: Michael Sallaberry San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency
Co-Presenter: Jeffrey Rosenblum City of Cambridge, MA
Title: Policies for Pupils: Working with School Boards on Walking and Bicycling Policies
Track: Change
Format: 90 minute panel
Abstract: Engaging schools in walking and bicycling efforts can be difficult given competing education priorities and frequent staff and volunteer turn-over. Attendees will learn about strategies for influencing school boards and policy opportunities at the district level.
Presenters:
Presenter: Sara Zimmerman Safe Routes to School National Partnership
Co-Presenter: Diane Dohm ChangeLab Solutions
Co-Presenter: Bree Romero Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
Co-Presenter: Leigh Ann Von Hagen Voorhees Transportation Center, Rutgers University
Title: Policies for Pupils: Working with School Boards on Walking and Bicycling Policies
Track: Change
Format: 90 minute panel
Abstract: Engaging schools in walking and bicycling efforts can be difficult given competing education priorities and frequent staff and volunteer turn-over. Attendees will learn about strategies for influencing school boards and policy opportunities at the district level.
Presenters:
Presenter: Sara Zimmerman Safe Routes to School National Partnership
Co-Presenter: Diane Dohm ChangeLab Solutions
Co-Presenter: Bree Romero Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
Co-Presenter: Leigh Ann Von Hagen Voorhees Transportation Center, Rutgers University
Title: Policies for Pupils: Working with School Boards on Walking and Bicycling Policies
Track: Change
Format: 90 minute panel
Abstract: Engaging schools in walking and bicycling efforts can be difficult given competing education priorities and frequent staff and volunteer turn-over. Attendees will learn about strategies for influencing school boards and policy opportunities at the district level.
Presenters:
Presenter: Sara Zimmerman Safe Routes to School National Partnership
Co-Presenter: Diane Dohm ChangeLab Solutions
Co-Presenter: Bree Romero Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
Co-Presenter: Leigh Ann Von Hagen Voorhees Transportation Center, Rutgers University
Title: 'Selling' Rural Communities on Cycling
Track: Prosper
Format: 60 minute panel
Abstract: This panel will share successful strategies and programs utilized in Oregon and Pennsylvania developed to leverage and promote the economic benefits of cycling in rural communities.
Presenters:
Presenter: Sheila Lyons Oregon DOT
Co-Presenter: Jessica Horning Oregon DOT
Co-Presenter: Cathy McCollom River Town Program
This document discusses livability, transportation alternative programs (TAP), and safe routes to school (SRTS) funding. It defines livability as tying transportation to access to jobs, housing, schools, and safe streets. TAP and SRTS funding can be used for byways projects like historic preservation, bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, and visitor centers. Examples of SRTS infrastructure projects include pedestrian bulb-outs, wider sidewalks, and underground utilities. Contact information is provided for livability, byways, and SRTS programs at the DOT.
The document discusses proposed updates to a city's zoning regulations regarding bicycle parking. It aims to increase the quantity and quality of bicycle parking required for new developments to better support the city's goal of 10% of trips by bicycle. The proposed changes would modify definitions, design standards, access requirements, and quantities of both long-term secured and short-term bicycle parking. It also allows for special permit modifications to requirements to accommodate new ideas and technologies.
Title: 'Selling' Rural Communities on Cycling
Track: Prosper
Format: 60 minute panel
Abstract: This panel will share successful strategies and programs utilized in Oregon and Pennsylvania developed to leverage and promote the economic benefits of cycling in rural communities.
Presenters:
Presenter: Sheila Lyons Oregon DOT
Co-Presenter: Jessica Horning Oregon DOT
Co-Presenter: Cathy McCollom River Town Program
Cycle Oregon provides grants from its $2 million fund to support projects in communities where its bicycle tours travel through and for statewide bicycling advocacy. It distributes around $100,000 annually in grants and gives approximately $130,000 yearly to communities that host its summer and September tours to help with event planning and volunteer support from residents, which are critical to the tours' success.
Title: A Systematic Approach to Bicycle Parking Planning for Cities
Track: Connect
Format: 60 minute panel
Abstract: Cambridge, MA and Washington, DC have taken a strategic approach to bicycle parking. This session will focus on their planning tools and lessons learned from both the public and private sector.
Presenters:
Presenter: Megan Kanagy Downtown DC Business Improvement District
Co-Presenter: Daniel Clark Dero Bike Rack Company
Co-Presenter: Jeffrey Rosenblum City of Cambridge, MA
Schedule:
Wednesday 9/10 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM in Breakout Rooms, 316
Title: Taking Pedestrian and Bicycle Counting Programs to the Next Level
Track: Connect
Format: 90 minute panel
Abstract: Panelists will provide practical guidance for pedestrian and bicycle counting programs based on findings from NCHRP Project 07-19, "Methods and Technologies for Collecting Pedestrian and Bicycle Volume Data."
Presenters:
Presenter: Robert Schneider University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Co-Presenter: RJ Eldridge Toole Design Group, LLC
Co-Presenter: Conor Semler Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Policies for Pupils: Working with School Boards on Walking and Bicycling Policies
Track: Change
Format: 90 minute panel
Abstract: Engaging schools in walking and bicycling efforts can be difficult given competing education priorities and frequent staff and volunteer turn-over. Attendees will learn about strategies for influencing school boards and policy opportunities at the district level.
Presenters:
Presenter: Sara Zimmerman Safe Routes to School National Partnership
Co-Presenter: Diane Dohm ChangeLab Solutions
Co-Presenter: Bree Romero Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
Co-Presenter: Leigh Ann Von Hagen Voorhees Transportation Center, Rutgers University
Federal Funding for Active Transportation and Recreation
Track: Connect
Format: 60 minute panel
Abstract: This session will provide an overview about federal transportation programs that can fund infrastructure for walking and bicycling.
Full Description: Federal programs provide funds to develop transportation, community, and recreation infrastructure for walking and bicycling and to connect communities and promote active living. Attendees will learn how about Federal programs to promote sustainable communities.
Learning Objectives:
Participants will learn about the Federal Partnership for Sustainable Communities.
Participants will learn about the Federal-aid surface transportation programs that benefit pedestrians and bicyclists.
Participants will be able to successfully write a competitive proposal.
Participants will understand how Federal, State, and local programs interact.
Presenter(s)
Presenter: Christopher Douwes Transportation Alternatives Program / Recreational Trails Program, FHWA
Co-Presenter: Wesley Blount Office of Planning, Environment & Realty FHWA
Title: Not Your Grandfather's DOT: The FDOT District 5 and PennDOT Experiences
Track: Connect
Format: 90 minute moderated discussion
Abstract: Today's economic realities require the rethinking of conventional transportation approaches. Learn about how Florida and Pennsylvania's Department of Transportation are using new tools, policies, and guides to proactively plan multi-modal transportation solutions.
Presenters:
Presenter: Jane Lim-Yap Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Co-Presenter: Steven Deck Parsons Brinckerhoff
Co-Presenter: Brian Hare PennDOT Program Center
Co-Presenter: Mary Raulerson Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Title: Not Your Grandfather's DOT: The FDOT District 5 and PennDOT Experiences
Track: Connect
Format: 90 minute moderated discussion
Abstract: Today's economic realities require the rethinking of conventional transportation approaches. Learn about how Florida and Pennsylvania's Department of Transportation are using new tools, policies, and guides to proactively plan multi-modal transportation solutions.
Presenters:
Presenter: Jane Lim-Yap Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Co-Presenter: Steven Deck Parsons Brinckerhoff
Co-Presenter: Brian Hare PennDOT Program Center
Co-Presenter: Mary Raulerson Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Title: Transportation Studies in the 21st Century: Incorporating all Modes
Track: Sustain
Format: 90 minute panel
Abstract: In the 21st century, the basic purpose of transportation studies needs to change from making it easier to drive to giving people options other than driving. This session will present case studies of alternatives to the auto-dominated Level of Service traffic impact studies in order to better address bicycling, transit and walking.
Presenters:
Presenter: Michelle DeRobertis Transportation Choices for Sustainable Communities
Co-Presenter: Peter Albert San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency
Co-Presenter: Patrick Lynch Transpo Group
Co-Presenter: David Thompson City of Boulder, Colorado
Title: Transportation Studies in the 21st Century: Incorporating all Modes
Track: Sustain
Format: 90 minute panel
Abstract: In the 21st century, the basic purpose of transportation studies needs to change from making it easier to drive to giving people options other than driving. This session will present case studies of alternatives to the auto-dominated Level of Service traffic impact studies in order to better address bicycling, transit and walking.
Presenters:
Presenter: Michelle DeRobertis Transportation Choices for Sustainable Communities
Co-Presenter: Peter Albert San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency
Co-Presenter: Patrick Lynch Transpo Group
Co-Presenter: David Thompson City of Boulder, Colorado
Title: Integrating a Health Impact Assessment into District-Wide School Travel Planning
Track: Prosper
Format: 60 minute panel
Abstract: Learn about how a Health Impact Assessment (HIA) was used for the first time to guide the formulation of the Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Columbus City Schools District-Wide School Travel Plan, which focused on schools and neighborhoods with health inequities.
Presenters:
Presenter: Brian Butler Columbus Public Health
Co-Presenter: Kate Moening Safe Routes to School National Partnership
Co-Presenter: Alex Smith Columbus Public Health
Co-Presenter: Julie Walcoff Ohio DOT
Title: Safer People, Safer Streets, and Safer Policies at USDOT
Track: Connect
Format: 90 minute moderated discussion
Abstract: This USDOT panel will provide details on the Department’s new bicycle and pedestrian safety initiative, including information on the Ped-Bike Safety Action Agenda, Road Safety for Transit Patrons initiative, bike-walk assessments, Road Diet Guide, an aggressive research agenda, and local partnerships, including how community members can get involved.
Presenters:
Presenter: Barbara McCann Office of Secretary, USDOT
Co-Presenter: Heidi Coleman National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Co-Presenter: Dan Goodman Office of Human Environment, Livability Team, FHWA
Co-Presenter: Joanne Waszczak Special Assistant, FTA Office of Budget and Policy
More from Project for Public Spaces & National Center for Biking and Walking (20)
Safer People, Safer Streets, and Safer Policies at USDOT--Dan Goodman
#9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Manaugh
1. Kevin Manaugh
PhD Candidate McGill School of Urban Planning
Pro Walk/Pro Bike Conference September 11, 2012
SCHOOL OF URBAN PLANNING
2. Context
Why do people walk?
Quality of walking environment
Convenience
Necessity
Environmental Awareness
Cultural or family values
Financial Constraints
Enjoyment
Exercise
Social connections
3. Walkability/Propensity to Walk
A vast literature explores walkability from a built
environment standpoint
A vast literature also explores propensity to walk
from a behavioural/psychological perspective
However, attempts to integrate these strands are less
common
Many research and policy contexts ignore issues of
motivation and satisfaction
4. Big Questions
Built form versus personal, household, neighbourhood,
cultural characteristics in walking decisions
Does satisfaction with walking trips vary by personal
motivations? In addition to distance, slope, safety etc.
5. 1) Context/Research Questions
How well do existing walkability indices explain the
variance in the choice to walk?
Does this vary by trip purpose and socio-
demographic factors?
What are the social equity implications of this?
8. Percentage of shopping trips by walking by decile
60
50
40
Walkscore
30 WI (800 m)
Walk Oppotunities
Pedshed (800m)
20
10
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
9. Percentage of shopping trips by walking by decile
60
581 trips
50
271 by foot
40
Walkscore
30 WI (800 m)
Walk Oppotunities
Pedshed (800m)
20
468 trips
24 by foot
10
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
10. Percentage of School trips by walking by decile
40
35
30
25
Walkscore
20 WI (800 m)
Walk Oppotunities
Pedshed (800m)
15
10
5
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11. Percentage of School trips by walking by decile
40
35
253 out of
917 trips
30
25
Walkscore
20
105 out of WI (800 m)
1063 trips Walk Oppotunities
Pedshed (800m)
15
10
5
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
12. Sensitivity Analysis
Probabilities calculated at the mean* by walkscore deciles
No car low Retired Wealthy Middle age no Middle Class Large Young Wealthy
income no kids Kids Families Families
First Decile 72.1% 36.1% 12.6% 21.4% 30.6% 29.7% 18.5% 3.3%
Fifth Decile 74.8% 65.2% 38.4% 43.6% 43.6% 49.7% 35.8% 16.2%
Tenth Decile 78.0% 89.4% 79.5% 74.1% 61.0% 74.1% 63.1% 63.2%
*36 year old female making a 734 meter (average length) shopping trip
13. Urban Form Content
Streets Destinations
Intersections Parks
Sidewalks Transit
Trails Schools
Resident
Needs
Desires
Expectation
Culture
14. Urban Form Content
Streets Destinations
Intersections Parks
Sidewalks Transit
Trails Schools
Resident
Needs
Desires
Expectation
Culture
15. Urban Form Content
Streets Destinations
Intersections Parks
Sidewalks Transit
Trails Schools
Resident
Needs
Desires Walkability
Expectation
Culture
16. Conclusions (Part 1)
Equity Issues
• People with limited choices are walking in
neighborhoods that are not ideal for walking
• Generalized indices (and performance measures)
might miss this distinction
• People walking does not necessarily equal good
walking environment
• Greater observed response among wealthy
households should not imply directed policy
response
17. Lessons Learned
Walkability is not “one size fits all” but depends on:
TripPurpose
Socio-economic factors
Gender
Age
Can perhaps best be described as a “match”
between built form factors and needs, preferences,
and desires of local residents.
What next?
18. Part 2
Does Distance Matter? Exploring the links
between motivations and satisfaction in
walking trips
19. Context
How do values and motivations relate to satisfaction
with walking trips?
Much of travel behaviour research focuses on built
environment and proximity/accessibility issues
Motivations to engage in active transportation and
derived satisfaction are often ignored
20. Context
Most utility-maximization frameworks assume that
travel time and distance are elements of a trip to
be minimized
However, recent research has highlighted the fact
that this may not always be the case
For example, do ‘environmentalists’ or ‘exercise
junkies’ show a different response to trip
characteristics?
21. Data
Survey
Description of commute
Motivations for using chosen mode
Residential choice factors
Trip satisfaction
GIS
Slope
Other walkability variables
Trip Distance
22. Methodology
Correlations among values, motivations, satisfaction
levels, and trip characteristics
Clustering of respondents by motivations to engage
in active transportation
23. Initial Findings
No significant relationship between satisfaction and
distance travelled or slope of path
Clustering of respondents by (self-reported)
motivation for walking
24. Cluster membership
Elevation
change Very Min (m) Max (m)
Cluster Count (m) satisfied (%) Distance (m)
Active cost Mimimizers 134 61.0** 19.4%**** 2034.2* 335.5 6068.6
Close Cost Mimimizers 88 29.7 25.0%**** 958.3 337.0 2354.3
Active Environmentalists 53 57.0** 52.8%*** 1801.3* 327.0 4020.9
Convenience 224 24.6 35.7% 846.3 194.5 3267.4
Close and exercise 106 30.9 40.6%*** 963.7 26.5 2862.5
Convenience and exercise 66 51.7** 39.4%*** 1675.6* 431.6 3561.6
*Statistically significant (ANOVA) F(5,671) = 61.18, p < .01(in relation to non-asterisks)
** (ANOVA) F(5,671) = 37.926, p < .01(in relation to non-asterisks)
***Chi-square (5, N = 671) = 27.58, p = .0001, higher than expected value
**** Chi-square (5, N = 671) = 27.58, p = .0001, lower than expected value
33. Conclusions
People walk for a variety of reasons and
motivations (many of which have nothing to do with
built environment factors)
People's satisfaction with walking is correlated with
these motivations
Satisfaction rates are generally high
34. Conclusions
Some people, particularly those with more
environmental awareness and propensity to
exercise, are more satisfied with longer distance
and greater slope
35. Conclusions
This might have important implications about how
walking behavior is understood, predicted, and
modeled, particularly in terms of further expanding
utility maximization models to include preferences
36. Conclusions
Policy implications: Is the goal to:
Increase mode share? (GHG and CC)
Increase total walking? (Population Health)
Improve satisfaction of those already walking? (Equity)
37. Conclusions
What does this all mean?
What are the most important, effective, efficient levers
to increase walk/bike mode share?
Policies, social marketing, infrastructure?
38. Kevin Manaugh kevin.manaugh@mail.mcgill.ca
SCHOOL OF URBAN PLANNING