Monitoring and evaluation are important processes for projects. Monitoring involves regularly collecting and recording information about all aspects of a project to inform decision-making and ensure progress is communicated. Evaluation assesses the merit and worth of project activities, outcomes, and impacts. Both processes provide accountability, promote learning, and help understand stakeholder perspectives to improve future project management, planning, and effectiveness. Key needs include assessing results, understanding different views, and ensuring accountability.
The document outlines the steps involved in project planning, including assessing the situation, identifying and prioritizing issues, designing the project, and developing implementation, monitoring and evaluation plans. It provides an example of planning an oral hygiene promotion project in a public primary school, and discusses commonly used tools like Gantt charts, logical framework analysis, and intervention mapping. Project planning is important as it helps select important problems and strategies, determine appropriate scope and quality, and identify resources to help implementation and evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluation for Project management.Muthuraj K
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is a set of techniques used in project management to establish controls and ensure a project stays on track to achieve its objectives. Monitoring involves systematically collecting, analyzing, and using information for management decisions and control. It provides information to identify and solve problems and assess progress. Evaluation determines the effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, impact, and sustainability of a project. Both monitoring and evaluation are important for project management and should be integrated throughout the project cycle.
Monitoring and evaluation provide real-time information on project implementation and more in-depth assessments, respectively. Monitoring checks progress toward goals and identifies issues to inform adjustments, while evaluation assesses what worked and didn't work independently. Both are integral to program management. Effective monitoring and evaluation establish what will be monitored and evaluated, responsibilities, methods, resources, and timing of activities to validate the program's logic and encourage improvements.
it includes 21 slides, having definition of project, project management, project management cycle.
it also explains all the phases of PMC.
it also includes characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of project management cycle.
Project cycle management (PCM) is an approach used to guide project management activities through all stages of a project's lifecycle from identification to evaluation. PCM defines key decisions, information requirements, and responsibilities at each phase to ensure projects are properly coordinated, completed within budget and time, and lessons are learned. When applied effectively, PCM provides benefits such as goal-oriented implementation, coordinated management, sound appraisal, increased accountability, and stakeholder ownership.
RBME is a tool for public sector management that can help track progress and demonstrate the impact of projects and policies. It focuses on outcomes and impacts rather than just inputs and outputs. Governments are increasingly expected to show results and address questions like whether policies are achieving desired outcomes. RBME involves setting targets and monitoring indicators over time to evaluate success, identify problems, and make corrections. Both monitoring and evaluation are needed to better manage initiatives and steer them toward goals.
Monitoring and evaluation are important processes for projects. Monitoring involves regularly collecting and recording information about all aspects of a project to inform decision-making and ensure progress is communicated. Evaluation assesses the merit and worth of project activities, outcomes, and impacts. Both processes provide accountability, promote learning, and help understand stakeholder perspectives to improve future project management, planning, and effectiveness. Key needs include assessing results, understanding different views, and ensuring accountability.
The document outlines the steps involved in project planning, including assessing the situation, identifying and prioritizing issues, designing the project, and developing implementation, monitoring and evaluation plans. It provides an example of planning an oral hygiene promotion project in a public primary school, and discusses commonly used tools like Gantt charts, logical framework analysis, and intervention mapping. Project planning is important as it helps select important problems and strategies, determine appropriate scope and quality, and identify resources to help implementation and evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluation for Project management.Muthuraj K
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is a set of techniques used in project management to establish controls and ensure a project stays on track to achieve its objectives. Monitoring involves systematically collecting, analyzing, and using information for management decisions and control. It provides information to identify and solve problems and assess progress. Evaluation determines the effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, impact, and sustainability of a project. Both monitoring and evaluation are important for project management and should be integrated throughout the project cycle.
Monitoring and evaluation provide real-time information on project implementation and more in-depth assessments, respectively. Monitoring checks progress toward goals and identifies issues to inform adjustments, while evaluation assesses what worked and didn't work independently. Both are integral to program management. Effective monitoring and evaluation establish what will be monitored and evaluated, responsibilities, methods, resources, and timing of activities to validate the program's logic and encourage improvements.
it includes 21 slides, having definition of project, project management, project management cycle.
it also explains all the phases of PMC.
it also includes characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of project management cycle.
Project cycle management (PCM) is an approach used to guide project management activities through all stages of a project's lifecycle from identification to evaluation. PCM defines key decisions, information requirements, and responsibilities at each phase to ensure projects are properly coordinated, completed within budget and time, and lessons are learned. When applied effectively, PCM provides benefits such as goal-oriented implementation, coordinated management, sound appraisal, increased accountability, and stakeholder ownership.
RBME is a tool for public sector management that can help track progress and demonstrate the impact of projects and policies. It focuses on outcomes and impacts rather than just inputs and outputs. Governments are increasingly expected to show results and address questions like whether policies are achieving desired outcomes. RBME involves setting targets and monitoring indicators over time to evaluate success, identify problems, and make corrections. Both monitoring and evaluation are needed to better manage initiatives and steer them toward goals.
This document presents information on the logical framework, which is a tool used for project planning and evaluation. It discusses the concept of the logical framework, its components, and importance. The logical framework consists of a matrix with objectives in the vertical column and indicators, means of verification, and assumptions in the horizontal columns. It helps bring order to project design, implementation, and evaluation through its systematic approach.
This document provides an overview of the Logical Framework Approach (LFA), which is an analytical tool used to strengthen project design, implementation, and evaluation. The LFA describes a project logically so that it is well-designed, objective, evaluable, and clearly structured. It involves analyzing objectives, strategies, indicators, and assumptions. The main stages are analysis and planning. Analysis includes stakeholder analysis, problem analysis, and objective analysis. Planning involves creating a Logical Framework Matrix with four columns showing intervention logic, indicators, verification sources, and assumptions.
PCM - Project Cycle Management, Training on Evaluationrexcris
The document discusses key concepts in project evaluation including definitions of evaluation, the project cycle, when evaluations should occur, purposes of evaluations, and criteria for evaluating development assistance including relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability. It provides examples of questions to consider under each of the five evaluation criteria. The summary focuses on defining the five evaluation criteria - relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability.
different sectors related to project and their classifications on basis of level of technology, scope and significance, size and scale, purpose, ownership and speed of implementation
Project monitoring and evaluation involves collecting data on project processes, outputs, and outcomes to track progress and inform stakeholders. Monitoring is continuous and internal, while evaluation is periodic and can be internal or external. The key aspects of monitoring include tracking inputs, activities, the process, and outputs, while evaluation assesses outcomes, impacts, efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability. Both use qualitative and quantitative data and involve stakeholders. Participatory monitoring and evaluation engages local people and beneficiaries to better understand impacts and ensure the process is learning-focused and adaptive.
The document provides an overview of logical framework analysis (LFA), which is a management tool used to design, monitor, and evaluate development projects. It explains the key components of an LFA, including: (1) analyzing problems and objectives, (2) clustering related objectives, (3) scoping the project, (4) determining intervention logic and external factors, and (5) developing a project planning matrix with objectives, indicators, means of verification, and assumptions. The LFA process helps improve project quality by ensuring objectives are clearly defined, stakeholders are involved, and assumptions and risks are explicitly stated.
The document provides an overview of monitoring and evaluation methods for programs. It discusses key concepts like monitoring, evaluation, attributes of each, and who conducts them. The five phases of evaluation are outlined: planning, method selection, data collection and analysis, reporting, and implementing recommendations. Specific monitoring and evaluation tools are also described. The overall summary is:
Monitoring and evaluation follow a five phase process including planning, method selection, data collection and analysis, reporting, and implementing recommendations to improve programs. Key concepts like monitoring, evaluation, attributes of each, tools used, and who conducts them are outlined.
Monitoring involves systematically collecting information about activities, products, services, users, and external factors affecting an organization. Evaluation involves making judgements about the value and effectiveness of an organization. Monitoring and evaluation are important for organizations to learn and improve, and to be accountable. They involve planning what to monitor and evaluate, collecting monitoring data, conducting evaluations, and using findings to learn and improve.
PPT with overall coverage of the project evaluation and all the topic of project evaluation and post project evaluation are covered in this ppt.It includes all the topic of project evaluation:-
=>which of the project should be evaluated?
=>cost&timing
=>social analysis
=>environmental analysis
=>progress report
=>final report
and many more topics are covered in this ppt for the brief description of project evaluation and some left out topics are numerical of project evaluation.
This document provides an overview of fundamentals of project planning and management. It defines what projects are, common traits of projects, objectives of projects, why projects fail, the typical project life cycle including initiation, planning, execution phases, and approaches to project management including traditional critical path methodology and more modern agile methodologies like Scrum and Kanban. Key points covered include defining projects, similarities across projects, objectives of scope, time and cost, common reasons for project failure, and benefits of agile project management approaches.
This document discusses project management. It defines a project as a combination of interrelated activities with well-defined objectives to be completed within a specific time period. Project management is then defined as the application of knowledge, skills, tools and techniques to project activities to meet requirements. The document outlines the importance of project management, including increasing project sizes, financial controls, and technology. It also discusses the benefits of project management such as clear work descriptions and timely completion.
This document provides an introduction to monitoring and evaluation (M&E) plans. It discusses what an M&E plan is, how it relates to a logic model, and how it can contribute to a program's success. An M&E plan describes a program's approach to implementing M&E activities, including what data will be collected, how and when data collection will occur, and who is responsible. It helps programs measure progress toward objectives and determine if desired results were achieved. The document also provides a template for components to include in an M&E plan and discusses how complexity of M&E plans has increased over time with different requirements from organizations like USAID, CDC, and GAC. It emphasizes involving relevant technical
The document discusses key aspects of project evaluation including:
1) It defines project evaluation as both a value judgement of the subject and a process of gathering information for decision making.
2) It outlines the evaluation process of measurement, comparison, and description leading to decisions.
3) It discusses the importance of evaluating projects for improving management and implementation through gathering information on objectives, costs, effects and recommendations.
The document defines key project management concepts including what constitutes a project, project characteristics, the differences between project and program management, the six basic project functions, common pitfalls, and the triple constraints of time, cost and scope. It also outlines the nine knowledge areas that comprise the project management framework: integration management, scope management, time management, cost management, quality management, human resource management, communications management, risk management, and procurement management.
The document discusses the logical framework approach (LFA), a systematic planning procedure used for project cycle management. It was developed in the 1960s by organizations like USAID and GTZ to improve development project planning and monitoring. The key aspects of the LFA include: (1) developing a hierarchy of goals, purposes, outputs and activities with clear cause-effect relationships; (2) specifying objectively verifiable indicators and means of verification for measuring progress and success; and (3) identifying important assumptions and risks outside the project's control that could affect success. The logical framework matrix visually captures these elements to facilitate participatory planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of a project.
This document discusses the logical framework approach to project planning and evaluation. It begins by defining the logical framework as a tool used to conceptualize a project, analyze assumptions, and facilitate monitoring and evaluation. It then explains the key components of a logical framework matrix, including goals, objectives, outputs, inputs, indicators, means of verification, and assumptions. Finally, it outlines some important benefits of the logical framework such as reducing planning confusion, determining responsibility and management, facilitating evaluation, and ensuring projects are accessible and straightforward.
The document discusses project management and the project cycle management methodology. It defines a project as having a defined start and end, specific scope, cost, and duration. Project management was developed to save time and resources by properly planning projects. Key success factors for projects include stakeholder involvement, executive support, clear requirements, proper planning, realistic expectations, competent staff, clear vision and objectives. The project cycle management methodology involves phases of programming, identification, formulation, financing decisions, implementation, and evaluation. It aims to promote local ownership and ensure projects support country objectives and benefit stakeholders. The role of the project manager is challenging given the one-shot nature of projects and reliance on communication skills.
Monitoring involves systematically collecting and analyzing data during project implementation to inform decision making, ensure activities are on track, and identify any needed corrections. Evaluation assesses projects after completion to determine relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability, and impact. Both processes provide information for accountability and learning, with monitoring focusing on operational performance and evaluation making judgments about overall achievement of objectives.
This document discusses the importance of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) for programs and projects. It defines monitoring as an ongoing process of collecting and analyzing data to track progress and make adjustments, while evaluation assesses relevance, effectiveness, impact and sustainability. The key aspects of building an M&E system are agreeing on outcomes to measure, selecting indicators, gathering baseline data, setting targets, monitoring implementation and results, reporting findings, and sustaining the system long-term. A strong M&E system provides evidence of achievements and challenges, enables learning and improvement, and helps ensure resources are allocated to effective programs.
The document introduces key concepts in project management. It defines a project as a temporary endeavor to create a unique product or service. It discusses characteristics of successful and failed projects. Project management aims to predict and prevent issues through applying skills and tools to meet stakeholder needs and expectations. It addresses managing scope, issues, costs, quality, communications, risks, and changes through a project life cycle of initiation, definition, planning, implementation, deployment, and closing phases. Project management tools like PERT charts and Gantt charts can illustrate tasks and schedules. The role of a project manager includes managing processes, people, issues, quality, and the overall work plan.
The document outlines the objectives, principles, content areas and task levels of the Division Monitoring and Evaluation framework. The key points are:
1. The objectives of the framework are to provide management information to improve education service delivery, implement projects and programs effectively, allocate resources appropriately, and assess organizational performance.
2. Principles of the framework include ensuring quality information, strengthening existing systems, achieving results efficiently, transparency, synergy between entities, and using M&E for continuous learning and accountability.
3. Content areas of focus for M&E in the division are delivery of education services, educational programs/projects, curriculum implementation, technical assistance, resources, and organizational effectiveness and support.
Two Examples of Program Planning, Monitoring and EvaluationMEASURE Evaluation
Presented by Laili Irani, Senior Policy Analyst for the Population Reference Bureau, as part of the Measuring Success Toolkit webinar in September 2012.
This document presents information on the logical framework, which is a tool used for project planning and evaluation. It discusses the concept of the logical framework, its components, and importance. The logical framework consists of a matrix with objectives in the vertical column and indicators, means of verification, and assumptions in the horizontal columns. It helps bring order to project design, implementation, and evaluation through its systematic approach.
This document provides an overview of the Logical Framework Approach (LFA), which is an analytical tool used to strengthen project design, implementation, and evaluation. The LFA describes a project logically so that it is well-designed, objective, evaluable, and clearly structured. It involves analyzing objectives, strategies, indicators, and assumptions. The main stages are analysis and planning. Analysis includes stakeholder analysis, problem analysis, and objective analysis. Planning involves creating a Logical Framework Matrix with four columns showing intervention logic, indicators, verification sources, and assumptions.
PCM - Project Cycle Management, Training on Evaluationrexcris
The document discusses key concepts in project evaluation including definitions of evaluation, the project cycle, when evaluations should occur, purposes of evaluations, and criteria for evaluating development assistance including relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability. It provides examples of questions to consider under each of the five evaluation criteria. The summary focuses on defining the five evaluation criteria - relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability.
different sectors related to project and their classifications on basis of level of technology, scope and significance, size and scale, purpose, ownership and speed of implementation
Project monitoring and evaluation involves collecting data on project processes, outputs, and outcomes to track progress and inform stakeholders. Monitoring is continuous and internal, while evaluation is periodic and can be internal or external. The key aspects of monitoring include tracking inputs, activities, the process, and outputs, while evaluation assesses outcomes, impacts, efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability. Both use qualitative and quantitative data and involve stakeholders. Participatory monitoring and evaluation engages local people and beneficiaries to better understand impacts and ensure the process is learning-focused and adaptive.
The document provides an overview of logical framework analysis (LFA), which is a management tool used to design, monitor, and evaluate development projects. It explains the key components of an LFA, including: (1) analyzing problems and objectives, (2) clustering related objectives, (3) scoping the project, (4) determining intervention logic and external factors, and (5) developing a project planning matrix with objectives, indicators, means of verification, and assumptions. The LFA process helps improve project quality by ensuring objectives are clearly defined, stakeholders are involved, and assumptions and risks are explicitly stated.
The document provides an overview of monitoring and evaluation methods for programs. It discusses key concepts like monitoring, evaluation, attributes of each, and who conducts them. The five phases of evaluation are outlined: planning, method selection, data collection and analysis, reporting, and implementing recommendations. Specific monitoring and evaluation tools are also described. The overall summary is:
Monitoring and evaluation follow a five phase process including planning, method selection, data collection and analysis, reporting, and implementing recommendations to improve programs. Key concepts like monitoring, evaluation, attributes of each, tools used, and who conducts them are outlined.
Monitoring involves systematically collecting information about activities, products, services, users, and external factors affecting an organization. Evaluation involves making judgements about the value and effectiveness of an organization. Monitoring and evaluation are important for organizations to learn and improve, and to be accountable. They involve planning what to monitor and evaluate, collecting monitoring data, conducting evaluations, and using findings to learn and improve.
PPT with overall coverage of the project evaluation and all the topic of project evaluation and post project evaluation are covered in this ppt.It includes all the topic of project evaluation:-
=>which of the project should be evaluated?
=>cost&timing
=>social analysis
=>environmental analysis
=>progress report
=>final report
and many more topics are covered in this ppt for the brief description of project evaluation and some left out topics are numerical of project evaluation.
This document provides an overview of fundamentals of project planning and management. It defines what projects are, common traits of projects, objectives of projects, why projects fail, the typical project life cycle including initiation, planning, execution phases, and approaches to project management including traditional critical path methodology and more modern agile methodologies like Scrum and Kanban. Key points covered include defining projects, similarities across projects, objectives of scope, time and cost, common reasons for project failure, and benefits of agile project management approaches.
This document discusses project management. It defines a project as a combination of interrelated activities with well-defined objectives to be completed within a specific time period. Project management is then defined as the application of knowledge, skills, tools and techniques to project activities to meet requirements. The document outlines the importance of project management, including increasing project sizes, financial controls, and technology. It also discusses the benefits of project management such as clear work descriptions and timely completion.
This document provides an introduction to monitoring and evaluation (M&E) plans. It discusses what an M&E plan is, how it relates to a logic model, and how it can contribute to a program's success. An M&E plan describes a program's approach to implementing M&E activities, including what data will be collected, how and when data collection will occur, and who is responsible. It helps programs measure progress toward objectives and determine if desired results were achieved. The document also provides a template for components to include in an M&E plan and discusses how complexity of M&E plans has increased over time with different requirements from organizations like USAID, CDC, and GAC. It emphasizes involving relevant technical
The document discusses key aspects of project evaluation including:
1) It defines project evaluation as both a value judgement of the subject and a process of gathering information for decision making.
2) It outlines the evaluation process of measurement, comparison, and description leading to decisions.
3) It discusses the importance of evaluating projects for improving management and implementation through gathering information on objectives, costs, effects and recommendations.
The document defines key project management concepts including what constitutes a project, project characteristics, the differences between project and program management, the six basic project functions, common pitfalls, and the triple constraints of time, cost and scope. It also outlines the nine knowledge areas that comprise the project management framework: integration management, scope management, time management, cost management, quality management, human resource management, communications management, risk management, and procurement management.
The document discusses the logical framework approach (LFA), a systematic planning procedure used for project cycle management. It was developed in the 1960s by organizations like USAID and GTZ to improve development project planning and monitoring. The key aspects of the LFA include: (1) developing a hierarchy of goals, purposes, outputs and activities with clear cause-effect relationships; (2) specifying objectively verifiable indicators and means of verification for measuring progress and success; and (3) identifying important assumptions and risks outside the project's control that could affect success. The logical framework matrix visually captures these elements to facilitate participatory planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of a project.
This document discusses the logical framework approach to project planning and evaluation. It begins by defining the logical framework as a tool used to conceptualize a project, analyze assumptions, and facilitate monitoring and evaluation. It then explains the key components of a logical framework matrix, including goals, objectives, outputs, inputs, indicators, means of verification, and assumptions. Finally, it outlines some important benefits of the logical framework such as reducing planning confusion, determining responsibility and management, facilitating evaluation, and ensuring projects are accessible and straightforward.
The document discusses project management and the project cycle management methodology. It defines a project as having a defined start and end, specific scope, cost, and duration. Project management was developed to save time and resources by properly planning projects. Key success factors for projects include stakeholder involvement, executive support, clear requirements, proper planning, realistic expectations, competent staff, clear vision and objectives. The project cycle management methodology involves phases of programming, identification, formulation, financing decisions, implementation, and evaluation. It aims to promote local ownership and ensure projects support country objectives and benefit stakeholders. The role of the project manager is challenging given the one-shot nature of projects and reliance on communication skills.
Monitoring involves systematically collecting and analyzing data during project implementation to inform decision making, ensure activities are on track, and identify any needed corrections. Evaluation assesses projects after completion to determine relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability, and impact. Both processes provide information for accountability and learning, with monitoring focusing on operational performance and evaluation making judgments about overall achievement of objectives.
This document discusses the importance of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) for programs and projects. It defines monitoring as an ongoing process of collecting and analyzing data to track progress and make adjustments, while evaluation assesses relevance, effectiveness, impact and sustainability. The key aspects of building an M&E system are agreeing on outcomes to measure, selecting indicators, gathering baseline data, setting targets, monitoring implementation and results, reporting findings, and sustaining the system long-term. A strong M&E system provides evidence of achievements and challenges, enables learning and improvement, and helps ensure resources are allocated to effective programs.
The document introduces key concepts in project management. It defines a project as a temporary endeavor to create a unique product or service. It discusses characteristics of successful and failed projects. Project management aims to predict and prevent issues through applying skills and tools to meet stakeholder needs and expectations. It addresses managing scope, issues, costs, quality, communications, risks, and changes through a project life cycle of initiation, definition, planning, implementation, deployment, and closing phases. Project management tools like PERT charts and Gantt charts can illustrate tasks and schedules. The role of a project manager includes managing processes, people, issues, quality, and the overall work plan.
The document outlines the objectives, principles, content areas and task levels of the Division Monitoring and Evaluation framework. The key points are:
1. The objectives of the framework are to provide management information to improve education service delivery, implement projects and programs effectively, allocate resources appropriately, and assess organizational performance.
2. Principles of the framework include ensuring quality information, strengthening existing systems, achieving results efficiently, transparency, synergy between entities, and using M&E for continuous learning and accountability.
3. Content areas of focus for M&E in the division are delivery of education services, educational programs/projects, curriculum implementation, technical assistance, resources, and organizational effectiveness and support.
Two Examples of Program Planning, Monitoring and EvaluationMEASURE Evaluation
Presented by Laili Irani, Senior Policy Analyst for the Population Reference Bureau, as part of the Measuring Success Toolkit webinar in September 2012.
This document discusses project monitoring and control. It defines monitoring as collecting, recording, and reporting project performance data. Key areas that are monitored include scope, schedule, costs, risks, quality, and human resources. Monitoring helps detect deviations from plans. The goals of monitoring and control are to keep the project on time and on budget. Control involves comparing actual performance to plans and taking action to correct deviations. Techniques discussed for monitoring and control include using earned value analysis, calculating critical ratios, and generating regular reports.
Top 7 social worker interview questions answerstomhandsome70
This document provides tips and sample answers for common interview questions for social workers. It discusses how to answer questions about yourself, your strengths, career goals, reasons for leaving previous jobs, weaknesses, knowledge of the organization, and ways you've improved your skills. For each question, it offers steps to formulate an effective response, such as connecting your experience to the job requirements or discussing how you've overcome weaknesses. Sample answers are provided for questions about your goals, knowledge of the organization, and skills improvement. Overall, the document aims to help social work candidates prepare compelling responses to standard interview questions.
Top 10 community services worker interview questions and answerstonychoper1106
This document provides resources and sample answers for common interview questions for a community services worker position. It includes links to ebooks on interview questions and tips for winning job interviews. Sample answers are provided for 10 common interview questions, including questions about why the applicant wants the job, what they have learned from past mistakes, challenges they are seeking, describing a typical work week, weaknesses, why they should be hired, what they know about the company, why they want to work there, if salary attracted them to the role, and questions they have for the interviewer.
The document discusses project monitoring and control. It describes the various activities that must be regularly monitored during a project, including scope, schedule, budget, risk, and contract management. It also explains the key elements of project control: baseline development, change control, and progress monitoring. Baselines establish plans for scope, schedule, budget, and stakeholder satisfaction. Change control manages changes to the project baselines and progress. Regular monitoring compares progress to the plans to identify variances requiring corrective action.
This document discusses project monitoring and control using earned value analysis (EVA) and burn graphs. It provides an overview of EVA, including its origins, explanations of key EVA concepts and metrics, examples of how to apply EVA, and potential shortcomings. It also covers burn graphs as a visual project monitoring tool, how they can be used in agile projects, and examples of burn graph types. Tools for implementing EVA and burn graphs are listed. The document concludes with potential discussion points about applying EVA and adopting burn graphs.
Managerial ethics refers to ethical standards and principles that guide managers' decisions and behavior in an organization. There are three main types of managerial ethics: immoral management which lacks ethics; moral management which adheres to high ethical standards; and amoral management which either does not consider ethics or is careless about them. To improve ethical behavior, managers should hire ethically, establish codes of ethics, lead by ethical example, provide ethics training, conduct audits, and support those facing dilemmas. Ethical decision making involves evaluating options based on ethical principles to select the most ethical alternative.
Managerial ethics (types of managerial ethics)cidroypaes
This document discusses ethics and managerial ethics. It defines ethics as the code of moral principles that govern what is right and wrong for a person or group. Managerial ethics refers to making ethical decisions that consider what is right, proper, and just regarding relationships with customers, suppliers, stockholders, managers and subordinates. Having strong ethics improves the work environment, motivates employees, improves company image, and leads to cultural enrichment. There are three views of managerial ethics: utilitarian focuses on outcomes, rights respects individual liberties, and duties are based on responsibilities and obligations. The document also discusses three models of management ethics and approaches to forming ethical rules and relationships with stakeholders and coworkers.
Top 14 common mistakes in job interviewsjobguide247
This document lists and describes 14 common mistakes people make during job interviews. Some of the key mistakes highlighted include criticizing a previous employer, which can make the candidate seem negative; failing to provide concrete examples and results when answering interview questions; and providing inappropriate references such as family members instead of professional contacts. The document stresses the importance of researching the company beforehand, making a good impression on social media, dressing appropriately for interviews, and showing how you can meet the company's needs.
This document provides tips for preparing for a job interview in 6 steps:
1) Thoroughly research the company, including reading annual reports and learning about current issues/problems facing the company.
2) Research the individuals who will be interviewing you, including reviewing their bios and LinkedIn profiles.
3) Seek insider information from someone familiar with the company who can provide insights.
4) Review common interview questions online to prepare for potential questions and examples of good answers.
5) Study your resume and recruit others to quiz you on it so you can discuss your relevant experience.
6) Approach the interview from the employer's perspective, knowing they want the hire to work out.
The document lists the top 12 skills for career success in 2017: 1) Communication skills, 2) Teamwork, 3) Analytical and problem-solving skills, 4) Personal management skills, 5) Interpersonal effectiveness, 6) Computer/technical literacy, 7) Leadership/management skills, 8) Learning skills, 9) Initiative in the workplace, 10) Strong work values, 11) Adaptability, and 12) Computer and technology proficiency. Employers value skills such as communicating effectively, working well in teams, solving problems creatively, managing tasks, building relationships, adapting to change, and being proficient with technology.
Definations for Learning 24 July 2022 [Autosaved].pptxInayatUllah780749
1. M&E definitions provide explanations of key terms like monitoring, evaluation, and different types of evaluations such as formative, process, outcome, impact, and summative evaluations.
2. Different types of evaluations occur at various stages of a project and serve different purposes, such as improving project implementation, assessing progress, or evaluating overall impact.
3. Evaluating coherence considers how well a project's internal components and external partnerships support its goals, highlighting the importance of synergies within and beyond the project.
This document provides an overview of project monitoring and evaluation. It defines monitoring as the regular collection of information to track changes over time, and evaluation as analyzing the effectiveness and impact of a project. The key purposes of monitoring and evaluation are to assess results, improve management, promote learning, ensure accountability, and understand stakeholder perspectives. Effective monitoring and evaluation considers outputs, processes, outcomes, impact, and reach. Internal evaluation is done by project staff, while external evaluation involves independent evaluators assessing how funds were used. Distinctions are made between monitoring as an ongoing activity and evaluation as an in-depth assessment.
This document discusses monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of projects and programs. It defines monitoring as the regular collection and analysis of information to track changes over time, while evaluation analyzes effectiveness, direction, and impact of an activity. The main differences are timing (monitoring is ongoing, evaluation is periodic) and questions asked (monitoring checks progress, evaluation assesses outcomes and impact). M&E helps assess results, improve management, promote learning, and ensure accountability. Key criteria for evaluating development assistance include relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability.
Monitoring and evaluation are important parts of project management. Monitoring involves regularly observing project activities and progress, while evaluation assesses the effectiveness, efficiency and relevance of the project.
Some key aspects covered in the document include:
1. Monitoring should take place throughout the project cycle including the planning, implementation and evaluation stages. It provides feedback to improve project performance.
2. Evaluation differs from monitoring in that it makes judgements about what the project achieved against its objectives. It identifies constraints and lessons for future projects.
3. Both internal and external evaluation are important. Internal monitoring is ongoing while external evaluation provides an unbiased assessment.
4. A variety of tools can be used for monitoring and evaluation including
The document discusses project management, defining it as the application of knowledge and skills to meet project requirements through processes like planning, executing, and controlling. It outlines key aspects of project management including defining objectives, constraints, life cycles, and phases. The document also discusses evaluation and assessment as important parts of the project management process.
The document discusses the differences between contract management and project management. It provides details on:
1) Project management focuses on managing a project to completion on time and on budget, while contract management focuses on managing agreements between parties to meet objectives.
2) Key differences include project management involving multiple entities working on one project, while contract management involves binding two or more separate entities.
3) Estimation techniques used in project management include effort estimation, cost estimation, and resource estimation to align project constraints like scope, time, cost, quality, resources, and risk.
Program Rationale and Logic for Post MonitoringThabang Nare
1) Project monitoring is an integral part of project management that provides information to identify implementation problems and assess progress towards objectives. It determines relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability.
2) Monitoring collects and analyzes information regularly to track implementation and measure performance against expected results. It is a management tool that provides information to support decision making and adaptive management.
3) Participatory evaluation seeks to actively engage stakeholders in reflecting on and assessing project progress, achievement of results, and taking joint action from evaluation findings. It assesses efficiency, effectiveness, relevance, sustainability, and impact.
Monitoring and Evaluation for development and governmental organizations.pdfGuta Mengesha
This document provides an overview of monitoring and evaluation for development and governmental organizations. It defines key terms and concepts related to monitoring and evaluation. Monitoring is defined as the continuous and systematic collection of data on specified indicators to track progress and performance. Evaluation is defined as the periodic assessment of a project, program, or policy to determine relevance, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability. The main difference between monitoring and evaluation is that monitoring is continuous, focuses on implementation and outputs, and helps management make adjustments, while evaluation is periodic, focuses on outcomes and results, and assesses the overall value of the intervention. The document outlines the goals, tools, and principles of both monitoring and evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluation for development and governmental organizations.pdfGutaMengesha1
This document provides an overview of monitoring and evaluation for development and governmental organizations. It defines key terms and concepts related to monitoring and evaluation. Monitoring is defined as the continuous and systematic collection of data on specified indicators to track progress and performance. Evaluation is defined as the periodic assessment of a project, program, or policy to determine relevance, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability. The main difference between monitoring and evaluation is that monitoring is continuous, focuses on implementation and outputs, and helps management make adjustments, while evaluation is periodic, focuses on outcomes and results, and assesses the overall value of the intervention. The document outlines the goals, tools, and principles of both monitoring and evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluation for development and governmental organizations.pdfGutaMengesha1
Monitoring and evaluation are important management tools for development organizations. Monitoring tracks ongoing progress and performance through continuous collection of data on indicators. Evaluation assesses completed projects through independent and objective assessments of design, implementation, outcomes, and impact. Some key differences are that monitoring focuses on implementation and outputs, while evaluation examines outcomes, effectiveness, and lessons learned. Both provide essential information for decision-making, accountability, and improving future work.
The field of program evaluation presents a diversity of images a.docxcherry686017
The field of program evaluation presents a diversity of images and claims about the nature and role of evaluation that confounds any attempt to construct a coher- ent account of its methods or confidently identify important new developments. We take the view that the overarching goal of the program evaluation enterprise is to contribute to the improvement of social conditions by providing scientifically credible information and balanced judgment to legitimate social agents about the effectiveness of interventions intended to produce social benefits. Because of its centrality in this perspective, this review focuses on outcome evaluation, that is, the assessment of the effects of interventions upon the populations they are intended to benefit. The coverage of this topic is concentrated on literature published within the last decade with particular attention to the period subsequent to the related reviews by Cook and Shadish (1994) on social experiments and Sechrest & Figueredo (1993) on program evaluation.
The word ‘evaluation’ has become increasingly used in the language of community, health and social services and programs. The growth of talk and practice of evaluation in these fields has often been promoted and encouraged by funders and commissioners of services and programs. Following the interest of funders, has been a growth in the study and practice of evaluation by community, health and social service practitioners and academics. When we consider why this move in evaluative thinking and practice has occurred, we can assume the position of the funder and simply answer, ‘...because we want to know if this program or service works’. Practitioners, specialists and academics in these fields have been called upon by governments and philanthropists to aid the development of effective evaluation. Over time, they have led their own thinking and practice independently. Evaluation in its simplest form is about understanding the effect and impact of a program, service, or indeed a whole organization. Evaluation as a practice is not so simple however, largely because in order to assess impact, we need to be very clear at the beginning what effect or difference we are trying to achieve.
The literature review begins with an overview of qualitative and quantitative research methods, followed by a description of key forms of evaluation. Health promotion evaluation and advocacy and policy evaluation will then be explored as two specific domains. These domains are not evaluation methodologies, but forms of evaluation that present unique requirements for effective community development evaluation. Following this discussion, the review will explore eight key evaluation methodologies: appreciative enquiry, empowerment evaluation, social capital,
social return on investment, outcomes based evaluation, performance dashboards and scorecards and developmental evaluation. Each of these sections will include specific methods, the values base of each methodo ...
1. The document discusses instructional leadership and monitoring and evaluation in education. It provides information on defining monitoring and evaluation, the purpose and importance of M&E, and the key steps in conducting monitoring and evaluation.
2.
During this masterclass, participants will delve into the fundamental concepts, tools, and techniques of project monitoring and evaluation. Through interactive discussions, case studies, and practical exercises, attendees will gain a comprehensive understanding of MEAL principles and their application in diverse project contexts.
Key Objectives
Understand the importance of project monitoring and evaluation in ensuring project success.
Learn how to develop and implement effective monitoring and evaluation frameworks.
Explore various data collection methods and analysis techniques for monitoring and evaluation purposes.
Gain insights into utilizing monitoring and evaluation findings to inform decision-making and improve project outcomes.
Learning Outcomes: By the end of the masterclass, participants will able to:
Define key concepts related to project monitoring and evaluation.
Develop a monitoring and evaluation plan tailored to specific project requirements.
Apply appropriate data collection methods and tools for monitoring and evaluation activities.
Utilize monitoring and evaluation findings to enhance project performance and impact.
Why Attend:
Enhance your professional skills: Acquire practical knowledge and skills in project monitoring and evaluation that can be applied across various sectors and industries.
Boost career prospects: Gain a competitive edge by adding project monitoring and evaluation expertise to your skill set, making you a valuable asset to organizations and employers.
Network with industry professionals: Connect with like-minded individuals, experts, and practitioners in the field of project management and evaluation, fostering valuable relationships and potential collaborations.
Stay updated with industry trends: Learn about the latest trends, best practices, and emerging technologies in project monitoring and evaluation, ensuring you stay ahead in your professional journey.
Monitoring and evaluation.
A presentation in Arabic/English prepared the Palestinian Center for Peace and Democracy (PCPD)
اعداد المركز الفلسطيني للسلام والديمقراطية
فلسطين , ديمقراطية , ديموقراطية , monitoring , elections, evaluation , politics
The document discusses project evaluation and recycling. It provides information on key concepts related to monitoring, evaluation, and the project life cycle. Some main points:
- Monitoring is the routine collection and use of data to assess progress towards objectives. Evaluation assesses activities designed to achieve tasks in a specified period of time.
- There are different types of evaluation that can be done at various stages, including formative, summative, and impact evaluations. Internal evaluations are done by project staff while external evaluations involve outside parties.
- Effective evaluation assesses outcomes, impacts, efficiency, effectiveness, and relevance. It utilizes tools like reports, surveys, and reviews. The results are then used to update project plans and determine
This presentation has a vivid description of the basics of doing a program evaluation, with detailed explanation of the " Log Frame work " ( LFA) with practical example from the CLICS project. This presentation also includes the CDC framework for evaluation of program.
N.B: Kindly open the ppt in slide share mode to fully use all the animations wheresoever made.
Monitoring involves continuous assessment of project implementation to provide feedback and identify successes and problems. It focuses on schedules, inputs, and services. Evaluation assesses outcomes, impacts, effectiveness, and sustainability. The document discusses the importance of monitoring and evaluation for improving decision-making, achieving outcomes, and organizational learning. It provides definitions and comparisons of monitoring and evaluation. Participatory approaches are emphasized to empower stakeholders. Clear objectives and indicators are needed to measure progress.
Participatory monitoring and evaluation.pptxJohnAutoroza1
Monitoring refers to tracking a project's implementation by studying progress, resources, and performance against schedules and indicators. It identifies issues requiring intervention and provides feedback to improve the project design. Evaluation assesses project outcomes and factors leading to results in order to enhance future project design. Participatory monitoring and evaluation involve stakeholders in assessing a project's implementation and impact through techniques like focus groups, participatory research, and drawing metaphors. This allows confirming if a project's purpose was fulfilled.
This document discusses project management, monitoring, control and evaluation. It provides information on various aspects of project monitoring and control including defining monitoring and control, their purpose, characteristics, and importance of planning. It also discusses developing a monitoring and evaluation plan and integrating monitoring and evaluation into the overall project plan.
This document contains information about a student named Mohamed Said Omar who is taking a course on Monitoring and Evaluation. It provides details about the student's registration information and the lecture. It then discusses the key differences between monitoring and evaluation. Monitoring involves regularly collecting implementation data, while evaluation assesses effectiveness and outcomes. The document also explains key principles of monitoring and evaluation like having clear indicators, reporting by relevant bodies, and using a results framework to link activities to goals. Overall, the document provides an overview of monitoring and evaluation concepts and how they are applied in a course on this topic.
This document discusses life's essential principles. It focuses on developing good character and following ethical practices in life. The key ideas presented are about cultivating positive qualities and behaviors.
Bridges in Vaigai River was written with the field work support by Mr. Karunakaran (Community Development
2001- 2003 Batch of MSW of Madurai Institute of Social Sciences) and modified for this article. All the photographs for this article are taken by Udayakumar (Community Development 2005-2007 Batch) of MSW.
The document discusses various phases and methods involved in community organization. It begins by outlining key phases like study, analysis, assessment, decision making, organization, action, evaluation and modification. It then examines specific methods that can be used in each phase, such as surveys, interviews, meetings and committees for gathering and analyzing information. The summary emphasizes that community organization involves systematic planning, assessment of community needs and resources, and collective decision making and action to address issues in a sustainable manner.
Human Resource Development and capacity building for NGOs, NPOs, VOsSrinivasan Rengasamy
This document discusses human resource development (HRD) and capacity building, particularly for voluntary organizations and NGOs working in community development.
It defines capacity building as activities that strengthen individuals' knowledge, skills, and behaviors to improve organizational structures and processes, allowing organizations to efficiently meet their missions. Capacity building generates greater resources, efficiency, and effectiveness for organizations. Training is seen as an important part of capacity building and HRD for staff in voluntary organizations, in order to effectively carry out functions like supplementing government efforts, organizing and training communities, and developing their own staff. The document outlines objectives, focus areas, and strategies for such training.
How to Create a Stage or a Pipeline in Odoo 17 CRMCeline George
Using CRM module, we can manage and keep track of all new leads and opportunities in one location. It helps to manage your sales pipeline with customizable stages. In this slide let’s discuss how to create a stage or pipeline inside the CRM module in odoo 17.
Get Success with the Latest UiPath UIPATH-ADPV1 Exam Dumps (V11.02) 2024yarusun
Are you worried about your preparation for the UiPath Power Platform Functional Consultant Certification Exam? You can come to DumpsBase to download the latest UiPath UIPATH-ADPV1 exam dumps (V11.02) to evaluate your preparation for the UIPATH-ADPV1 exam with the PDF format and testing engine software. The latest UiPath UIPATH-ADPV1 exam questions and answers go over every subject on the exam so you can easily understand them. You won't need to worry about passing the UIPATH-ADPV1 exam if you master all of these UiPath UIPATH-ADPV1 dumps (V11.02) of DumpsBase. #UIPATH-ADPV1 Dumps #UIPATH-ADPV1 #UIPATH-ADPV1 Exam Dumps
How to Download & Install Module From the Odoo App Store in Odoo 17Celine George
Custom modules offer the flexibility to extend Odoo's capabilities, address unique requirements, and optimize workflows to align seamlessly with your organization's processes. By leveraging custom modules, businesses can unlock greater efficiency, productivity, and innovation, empowering them to stay competitive in today's dynamic market landscape. In this tutorial, we'll guide you step by step on how to easily download and install modules from the Odoo App Store.
Post init hook in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, hooks are functions that are presented as a string in the __init__ file of a module. They are the functions that can execute before and after the existing code.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has revolutionized the creation of images and videos, enabling the generation of highly realistic and imaginative visual content. Utilizing advanced techniques like Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and neural style transfer, AI can transform simple sketches into detailed artwork or blend various styles into unique visual masterpieces. GANs, in particular, function by pitting two neural networks against each other, resulting in the production of remarkably lifelike images. AI's ability to analyze and learn from vast datasets allows it to create visuals that not only mimic human creativity but also push the boundaries of artistic expression, making it a powerful tool in digital media and entertainment industries.
Cross-Cultural Leadership and CommunicationMattVassar1
Business is done in many different ways across the world. How you connect with colleagues and communicate feedback constructively differs tremendously depending on where a person comes from. Drawing on the culture map from the cultural anthropologist, Erin Meyer, this class discusses how best to manage effectively across the invisible lines of culture.
220711130095 Tanu Pandey message currency, communication speed & control EPC ...
Project Monitoring & Evaluation
1. MONITORING “ As soon as the boss decides he wants his workers to do something, he has two problems: making them do it and monitoring what they do?. ”
22. Types of Evaluation Desired Situation Sustained benefits and impact Present Situation Mid-Term review End-of project or final evaluation Ex-post or impact evaluation Time PROJECT