尊敬的 微信汇率:1円 ≈ 0.046166 元 支付宝汇率:1円 ≈ 0.046257元 [退出登录]
SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Classification: Basic Concepts and
Decision Trees
A programming task
Classification: Definition
 Given a collection of records (training
set )
 Each record contains a set of attributes, one of the
attributes is the class.
 Find a model for class attribute as a
function of the values of other
attributes.
 Goal: previously unseen records should
be assigned a class as accurately as
possible.
 A test set is used to determine the accuracy of the
model. Usually, the given data set is divided into
training and test sets, with training set used to build
the model and test set used to validate it.
Illustrating Classification Task
Apply
Model
Induction
Deduction
Learn
Model
Model
Tid Attrib1 Attrib2 Attrib3 Class
1 Yes Large 125K No
2 No Medium 100K No
3 No Small 70K No
4 Yes Medium 120K No
5 No Large 95K Yes
6 No Medium 60K No
7 Yes Large 220K No
8 No Small 85K Yes
9 No Medium 75K No
10 No Small 90K Yes
10
Tid Attrib1 Attrib2 Attrib3 Class
11 No Small 55K ?
12 Yes Medium 80K ?
13 Yes Large 110K ?
14 No Small 95K ?
15 No Large 67K ?
10
Test Set
Learning
algorithm
Training Set
Examples of Classification Task
 Predicting tumor cells as benign or malignant
 Classifying credit card transactions
as legitimate or fraudulent
 Classifying secondary structures of protein
as alpha-helix, beta-sheet, or random
coil
 Categorizing news stories as finance,
weather, entertainment, sports, etc
Classification Using Distance
 Place items in class to which they are
“closest”.
 Must determine distance between an
item and a class.
 Classes represented by
 Centroid: Central value.
 Medoid: Representative point.
 Individual points
 Algorithm: KNN
K Nearest Neighbor (KNN):
 Training set includes classes.
 Examine K items near item to be
classified.
 New item placed in class with the most
number of close items.
 O(q) for each tuple to be classified.
(Here q is the size of the training set.)
KNN
Classification Techniques
 Decision Tree based Methods
 Rule-based Methods
 Memory based reasoning
 Neural Networks
 Naïve Bayes and Bayesian Belief Networks
 Support Vector Machines
Example of a Decision Tree
Tid Refund Marital
Status
Taxable
Income Cheat
1 Yes Single 125K No
2 No Married 100K No
3 No Single 70K No
4 Yes Married 120K No
5 No Divorced 95K Yes
6 No Married 60K No
7 Yes Divorced 220K No
8 No Single 85K Yes
9 No Married 75K No
10 No Single 90K Yes
10
Refund
MarSt
TaxInc
YES
NO
NO
NO
Yes No
Married
Single, Divorced
< 80K > 80K
Splitting Attributes
Training Data Model: Decision Tree
Another Example of Decision Tree
Tid Refund Marital
Status
Taxable
Income Cheat
1 Yes Single 125K No
2 No Married 100K No
3 No Single 70K No
4 Yes Married 120K No
5 No Divorced 95K Yes
6 No Married 60K No
7 Yes Divorced 220K No
8 No Single 85K Yes
9 No Married 75K No
10 No Single 90K Yes
10
MarSt
Refund
TaxInc
YES
NO
NO
NO
Yes No
Married
Single,
Divorced
< 80K > 80K
There could be more than one tree that
fits the same data!
Decision Tree Classification Task
Apply
Model
Induction
Deduction
Learn
Model
Model
Tid Attrib1 Attrib2 Attrib3 Class
1 Yes Large 125K No
2 No Medium 100K No
3 No Small 70K No
4 Yes Medium 120K No
5 No Large 95K Yes
6 No Medium 60K No
7 Yes Large 220K No
8 No Small 85K Yes
9 No Medium 75K No
10 No Small 90K Yes
10
Tid Attrib1 Attrib2 Attrib3 Class
11 No Small 55K ?
12 Yes Medium 80K ?
13 Yes Large 110K ?
14 No Small 95K ?
15 No Large 67K ?
10
Test Set
Tree
Induction
algorithm
Training Set
Decision
Tree
Apply Model to Test Data
Refund
MarSt
TaxInc
YES
NO
NO
NO
Yes No
Married
Single, Divorced
< 80K > 80K
Refund Marital
Status
Taxable
Income Cheat
No Married 80K ?
10
Test Data
Start from the root of tree.
Apply Model to Test Data
Refund
MarSt
TaxInc
YES
NO
NO
NO
Yes No
Married
Single, Divorced
< 80K > 80K
Refund Marital
Status
Taxable
Income Cheat
No Married 80K ?
10
Test Data
Apply Model to Test Data
Refund
MarSt
TaxInc
YES
NO
NO
NO
Yes No
Married
Single, Divorced
< 80K > 80K
Refund Marital
Status
Taxable
Income Cheat
No Married 80K ?
10
Test Data
Apply Model to Test Data
Refund
MarSt
TaxInc
YES
NO
NO
NO
Yes No
Married
Single, Divorced
< 80K > 80K
Refund Marital
Status
Taxable
Income Cheat
No Married 80K ?
10
Test Data
Apply Model to Test Data
Refund
MarSt
TaxInc
YES
NO
NO
NO
Yes No
Married
Single, Divorced
< 80K > 80K
Refund Marital
Status
Taxable
Income Cheat
No Married 80K ?
10
Test Data
Apply Model to Test Data
Refund
MarSt
TaxInc
YES
NO
NO
NO
Yes No
Married
Single, Divorced
< 80K > 80K
Refund Marital
Status
Taxable
Income Cheat
No Married 80K ?
10
Test Data
Assign Cheat to “No”
Decision Tree Classification Task
Apply
Model
Induction
Deduction
Learn
Model
Model
Tid Attrib1 Attrib2 Attrib3 Class
1 Yes Large 125K No
2 No Medium 100K No
3 No Small 70K No
4 Yes Medium 120K No
5 No Large 95K Yes
6 No Medium 60K No
7 Yes Large 220K No
8 No Small 85K Yes
9 No Medium 75K No
10 No Small 90K Yes
10
Tid Attrib1 Attrib2 Attrib3 Class
11 No Small 55K ?
12 Yes Medium 80K ?
13 Yes Large 110K ?
14 No Small 95K ?
15 No Large 67K ?
10
Test Set
Tree
Induction
algorithm
Training Set
Decision
Tree
Decision Tree Induction
 Many Algorithms:
 Hunt’s Algorithm (one of the earliest)
 CART
 ID3, C4.5
 SLIQ,SPRINT
General Structure of Hunt’s
Algorithm
 Let Dt be the set of training
records that reach a node t
 General Procedure:
 If Dt contains records that
belong the same class yt, then
t is a leaf node labeled as yt
 If Dt is an empty set, then t is
a leaf node labeled by the
default class, yd
 If Dt contains records that
belong to more than one
class, use an attribute test to
split the data into smaller
subsets. Recursively apply the
procedure to each subset.
Tid Refund Marital
Status
Taxable
Income Cheat
1 Yes Single 125K No
2 No Married 100K No
3 No Single 70K No
4 Yes Married 120K No
5 No Divorced 95K Yes
6 No Married 60K No
7 Yes Divorced 220K No
8 No Single 85K Yes
9 No Married 75K No
10 No Single 90K Yes
10
Dt
?
Hunt’s Algorithm
Don’t
Cheat
Refund
Don’t
Cheat
Don’t
Cheat
Yes No
Refund
Don’t
Cheat
Yes No
Marital
Status
Don’t
Cheat
Cheat
Single,
Divorced
Married
Taxable
Income
Don’t
Cheat
< 80K >= 80K
Refund
Don’t
Cheat
Yes No
Marital
Status
Don’t
Cheat
Cheat
Single,
Divorced
Married
Tid Refund Marital
Status
Taxable
Income Cheat
1 Yes Single 125K No
2 No Married 100K No
3 No Single 70K No
4 Yes Married 120K No
5 No Divorced 95K Yes
6 No Married 60K No
7 Yes Divorced 220K No
8 No Single 85K Yes
9 No Married 75K No
10 No Single 90K Yes
10
Tree Induction
 Greedy strategy.
 Split the records based on an attribute test
that optimizes certain criterion.
 Issues
 Determine how to split the records
 How to specify the attribute test condition?
 How to determine the best split?
 Determine when to stop splitting
Tree Induction
 Greedy strategy.
 Split the records based on an attribute test
that optimizes certain criterion.
 Issues
 Determine how to split the records
 How to specify the attribute test condition?
 How to determine the best split?
 Determine when to stop splitting
How to Specify Test Condition?
 Depends on attribute types
 Nominal
 Ordinal
 Continuous
 Depends on number of ways to split
 2-way split
 Multi-way split
Splitting Based on Nominal Attributes
 Multi-way split: Use as many partitions as distinct
values.
 Binary split: Divides values into two subsets.
Need to find optimal partitioning.
CarType
Family
Sports
Luxury
CarType
{Family,
Luxury} {Sports}
CarType
{Sports,
Luxury} {Family}
OR
 Multi-way split: Use as many partitions as distinct
values.
 Binary split: Divides values into two subsets.
Need to find optimal partitioning.
 What about this split?
Splitting Based on Ordinal
Attributes
Size
Small
Medium
Large
Size
{Medium,
Large} {Small}
Size
{Small,
Medium} {Large}
OR
Size
{Small,
Large} {Medium}
Splitting Based on Continuous
Attributes
 Different ways of handling
 Discretization to form an ordinal categorical
attribute
 Static – discretize once at the beginning
 Dynamic – ranges can be found by equal interval
bucketing, equal frequency bucketing
(percentiles), or clustering.
 Binary Decision: (A < v) or (A  v)
 consider all possible splits and finds the best cut
 can be more compute intensive
Splitting Based on Continuous
Attributes
Taxable
Income
> 80K?
Yes No
Taxable
Income?
(i) Binary split (ii) Multi-way split
< 10K
[10K,25K) [25K,50K) [50K,80K)
> 80K
Tree Induction
 Greedy strategy.
 Split the records based on an attribute test
that optimizes certain criterion.
 Issues
 Determine how to split the records
 How to specify the attribute test condition?
 How to determine the best split?
 Determine when to stop splitting
How to determine the Best Split
Own
Car?
C0: 6
C1: 4
C0: 4
C1: 6
C0: 1
C1: 3
C0: 8
C1: 0
C0: 1
C1: 7
Car
Type?
C0: 1
C1: 0
C0: 1
C1: 0
C0: 0
C1: 1
Student
ID?
...
Yes No Family
Sports
Luxury c1
c10
c20
C0: 0
C1: 1
...
c11
Before Splitting: 10 records of class 0,
10 records of class 1
Which test condition is the best?
How to determine the Best Split
 Greedy approach:
 Nodes with homogeneous class distribution are
preferred
 Need a measure of node impurity:
C0: 5
C1: 5
C0: 9
C1: 1
Non-homogeneous,
High degree of impurity
Homogeneous,
Low degree of impurity
Measures of Node Impurity
 Gini Index
 Entropy
 Misclassification error
How to Find the Best Split
B?
Yes No
Node N3 Node N4
A?
Yes No
Node N1 Node N2
Before Splitting:
C0 N10
C1 N11
C0 N20
C1 N21
C0 N30
C1 N31
C0 N40
C1 N41
C0 N00
C1 N01
M0
M1 M2 M3 M4
M12 M34
Gain = M0 – M12 vs M0 – M34
Measure of Impurity: GINI
 Gini Index for a given node t :
(NOTE: p( j | t) is the relative frequency of class j at node t).
 Maximum (1 - 1/nc) when records are equally
distributed among all classes, implying least interesting
information
 Minimum (0.0) when all records belong to one class,
implying most interesting information



j
t
j
p
t
GINI 2
)]
|
(
[
1
)
(
C1 0
C2 6
Gini=0.000
C1 2
C2 4
Gini=0.444
C1 3
C2 3
Gini=0.500
C1 1
C2 5
Gini=0.278
Examples for computing GINI
C1 0
C2 6
C1 2
C2 4
C1 1
C2 5
P(C1) = 0/6 = 0 P(C2) = 6/6 = 1
Gini = 1 – P(C1)2 – P(C2)2 = 1 – 0 – 1 = 0



j
t
j
p
t
GINI 2
)]
|
(
[
1
)
(
P(C1) = 1/6 P(C2) = 5/6
Gini = 1 – (1/6)2 – (5/6)2 = 0.278
P(C1) = 2/6 P(C2) = 4/6
Gini = 1 – (2/6)2 – (4/6)2 = 0.444
Splitting Based on GINI
 Used in CART, SLIQ, SPRINT.
 When a node p is split into k partitions (children),
the quality of split is computed as,
where, ni = number of records at child i,
n = number of records at node p.



k
i
i
split i
GINI
n
n
GINI
1
)
(
Binary Attributes: Computing GINI
Index
 Splits into two partitions
 Effect of Weighing partitions:
 Larger and Purer Partitions are sought for.
B?
Yes No
Node N1 Node N2
Parent
C1 6
C2 6
Gini = 0.500
N1 N2
C1 5 1
C2 2 4
Gini=0.333
Gini(N1)
= 1 – (5/6)2 – (2/6)2
= 0.194
Gini(N2)
= 1 – (1/6)2 – (4/6)2
= 0.528
Gini(Children)
= 7/12 * 0.194 +
5/12 * 0.528
= 0.333
Categorical Attributes: Computing Gini
Index
 For each distinct value, gather counts for each
class in the dataset
 Use the count matrix to make decisions
CarType
{Sports,
Luxury}
{Family}
C1 3 1
C2 2 4
Gini 0.400
CarType
{Sports}
{Family,
Luxury}
C1 2 2
C2 1 5
Gini 0.419
CarType
Family Sports Luxury
C1 1 2 1
C2 4 1 1
Gini 0.393
Multi-way split Two-way split
(find best partition of values)
Continuous Attributes: Computing Gini
Index
 Use Binary Decisions based on
one value
 Several Choices for the splitting
value
 Number of possible splitting
values
= Number of distinct values
 Each splitting value has a count
matrix associated with it
 Class counts in each of the
partitions, A < v and A  v
 Simple method to choose best v
 For each v, scan the database to
gather count matrix and compute
its Gini index
 Computationally Inefficient!
Repetition of work.
Tid Refund Marital
Status
Taxable
Income Cheat
1 Yes Single 125K No
2 No Married 100K No
3 No Single 70K No
4 Yes Married 120K No
5 No Divorced 95K Yes
6 No Married 60K No
7 Yes Divorced 220K No
8 No Single 85K Yes
9 No Married 75K No
10 No Single 90K Yes
10
Taxable
Income
> 80K?
Yes No
Continuous Attributes: Computing Gini
Index...
 For efficient computation: for each attribute,
 Sort the attribute on values
 Linearly scan these values, each time updating the count
matrix and computing gini index
 Choose the split position that has the least gini index
Cheat No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No No
Taxable Income
60 70 75 85 90 95 100 120 125 220
55 65 72 80 87 92 97 110 122 172 230
<= > <= > <= > <= > <= > <= > <= > <= > <= > <= > <= >
Yes 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 1 2 2 1 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0
No 0 7 1 6 2 5 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 4 3 5 2 6 1 7 0
Gini 0.420 0.400 0.375 0.343 0.417 0.400 0.300 0.343 0.375 0.400 0.420
Split Positions
Sorted Values
Alternative Splitting Criteria based on
INFO
 Entropy at a given node t:
(NOTE: p( j | t) is the relative frequency of class j at node t).
 Measures homogeneity of a node.
 Maximum (log nc) when records are equally distributed
among all classes implying least information
 Minimum (0.0) when all records belong to one class,
implying most information
 Entropy based computations are similar to the
GINI index computations


 j
t
j
p
t
j
p
t
Entropy )
|
(
log
)
|
(
)
(
Examples for computing Entropy
C1 0
C2 6
C1 2
C2 4
C1 1
C2 5
P(C1) = 0/6 = 0 P(C2) = 6/6 = 1
Entropy = – 0 log 0 – 1 log 1 = – 0 – 0 = 0
P(C1) = 1/6 P(C2) = 5/6
Entropy = – (1/6) log2 (1/6) – (5/6) log2 (1/6) = 0.65
P(C1) = 2/6 P(C2) = 4/6
Entropy = – (2/6) log2 (2/6) – (4/6) log2 (4/6) = 0.92


 j
t
j
p
t
j
p
t
Entropy )
|
(
log
)
|
(
)
( 2
Splitting Based on INFO...
 Information Gain:
Parent Node, p is split into k partitions;
ni is number of records in partition i
 Measures Reduction in Entropy achieved because of the
split. Choose the split that achieves most reduction
(maximizes GAIN)
 Used in ID3 and C4.5
 Disadvantage: Tends to prefer splits that result in large
number of partitions, each being small but pure.







 

k
i
i
split
i
Entropy
n
n
p
Entropy
GAIN 1
)
(
)
(
Splitting Based on INFO...
 Gain Ratio:
Parent Node, p is split into k partitions
ni is the number of records in partition i
 Adjusts Information Gain by the entropy of the
partitioning (SplitINFO). Higher entropy partitioning
(large number of small partitions) is penalized!
 Used in C4.5
 Designed to overcome the disadvantage of Information
Gain
SplitINFO
GAIN
GainRATIO Split
split
 



k
i
i
i
n
n
n
n
SplitINFO 1
log
Splitting Criteria based on Classification
Error
 Classification error at a node t :
 Measures misclassification error made by a node.
 Maximum (1 - 1/nc) when records are equally distributed
among all classes, implying least interesting information
 Minimum (0.0) when all records belong to one class,
implying most interesting information
)
|
(
max
1
)
( t
i
P
t
Error i


Examples for Computing Error
C1 0
C2 6
C1 2
C2 4
C1 1
C2 5
P(C1) = 0/6 = 0 P(C2) = 6/6 = 1
Error = 1 – max (0, 1) = 1 – 1 = 0
P(C1) = 1/6 P(C2) = 5/6
Error = 1 – max (1/6, 5/6) = 1 – 5/6 = 1/6
P(C1) = 2/6 P(C2) = 4/6
Error = 1 – max (2/6, 4/6) = 1 – 4/6 = 1/3
)
|
(
max
1
)
( t
i
P
t
Error i


Comparison among Splitting Criteria
For a 2-class problem:
Misclassification Error vs Gini
A?
Yes No
Node N1 Node N2
Parent
C1 7
C2 3
Gini = 0.42
N1 N2
C1 3 4
C2 0 3
Gini(N1)
= 1 – (3/3)2 – (0/3)2
= 0
Gini(N2)
= 1 – (4/7)2 – (3/7)2
= 0.489
Gini(Children)
= 3/10 * 0
+ 7/10 * 0.489
= 0.342
Tree Induction
 Greedy strategy.
 Split the records based on an attribute test
that optimizes certain criterion.
 Issues
 Determine how to split the records
 How to specify the attribute test condition?
 How to determine the best split?
 Determine when to stop splitting
Stopping Criteria for Tree Induction
 Stop expanding a node when all the
records belong to the same class
 Stop expanding a node when all the
records have similar attribute values
 Early termination (to be discussed later)
Decision Tree Based Classification
 Advantages:
 Inexpensive to construct
 Extremely fast at classifying unknown records
 Easy to interpret for small-sized trees
 Accuracy is comparable to other classification
techniques for many simple data sets
Example: C4.5
 Simple depth-first construction.
 Uses Information Gain
 Sorts Continuous Attributes at each node.
 Needs entire data to fit in memory.
 Unsuitable for Large Datasets.
 Needs out-of-core sorting.
 You can download the software from:
http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~quinlan/c4.5r8.tar.
gz
Practical Issues of Classification
 Underfitting and Overfitting
 Missing Values
 Costs of Classification
Underfitting and Overfitting
(Example)
500 circular and 500
triangular data points.
Circular points:
0.5  sqrt(x1
2+x2
2)  1
Triangular points:
sqrt(x1
2+x2
2) > 0.5 or
sqrt(x1
2+x2
2) < 1
Underfitting and Overfitting
Overfitting
Underfitting: when model is too simple, both training and test errors are large
Overfitting due to Noise
Decision boundary is distorted by noise point
Overfitting due to Insufficient
Examples
Lack of data points in the lower half of the diagram makes it difficult
to predict correctly the class labels of that region
- Insufficient number of training records in the region causes the
decision tree to predict the test examples using other training
records that are irrelevant to the classification task
Notes on Overfitting
 Overfitting results in decision trees that
are more complex than necessary
 Training error no longer provides a good
estimate of how well the tree will perform
on previously unseen records
 Need new ways for estimating errors
Estimating Generalization Errors
 Re-substitution errors: error on training ( e(t) )
 Generalization errors: error on testing ( e’(t))
 Methods for estimating generalization errors:
 Optimistic approach: e’(t) = e(t)
 Pessimistic approach:
 For each leaf node: e’(t) = (e(t)+0.5)
 Total errors: e’(T) = e(T) + N  0.5 (N: number of leaf
nodes)
 For a tree with 30 leaf nodes and 10 errors on training
(out of 1000 instances):
Training error = 10/1000 = 1%
Generalization error = (10 + 300.5)/1000 = 2.5%
 Reduced error pruning (REP):
 uses validation data set to estimate generalization
error
Occam’s Razor
 Given two models of similar generalization
errors, one should prefer the simpler
model over the more complex model
 For complex models, there is a greater
chance that it was fitted accidentally by
errors in data
 Therefore, one should include model
complexity when evaluating a model
Minimum Description Length
(MDL)
 Cost(Model,Data) = Cost(Data|Model) + Cost(Model)
 Cost is the number of bits needed for encoding.
 Search for the least costly model.
 Cost(Data|Model) encodes the misclassification errors.
 Cost(Model) uses node encoding (number of children) plus
splitting condition encoding.
A B
A?
B?
C?
1
0
0
1
Yes No
B1 B2
C1 C2
X y
X1 1
X2 0
X3 0
X4 1
… …
Xn 1
X y
X1 ?
X2 ?
X3 ?
X4 ?
… …
Xn ?
How to Address Overfitting
 Pre-Pruning (Early Stopping Rule)
 Stop the algorithm before it becomes a fully-grown tree
 Typical stopping conditions for a node:
 Stop if all instances belong to the same class
 Stop if all the attribute values are the same
 More restrictive conditions:
 Stop if number of instances is less than some user-specified
threshold
 Stop if class distribution of instances are independent of the
available features (e.g., using  2 test)
 Stop if expanding the current node does not improve impurity
measures (e.g., Gini or information gain).
How to Address Overfitting…
 Post-pruning
 Grow decision tree to its entirety
 Trim the nodes of the decision tree in a
bottom-up fashion
 If generalization error improves after
trimming, replace sub-tree by a leaf node.
 Class label of leaf node is determined from
majority class of instances in the sub-tree
 Can use MDL for post-pruning
Example of Post-Pruning
A?
A1
A2 A3
A4
Class = Yes 20
Class = No 10
Error = 10/30
Training Error (Before splitting) = 10/30
Pessimistic error = (10 + 0.5)/30 = 10.5/30
Training Error (After splitting) = 9/30
Pessimistic error (After splitting)
= (9 + 4  0.5)/30 = 11/30
PRUNE!
Class =
Yes
8
Class =
No
4
Class =
Yes
3
Class =
No
4
Class =
Yes
4
Class =
No
1
Class =
Yes
5
Class =
No
1
Examples of Post-pruning
 Optimistic error?
 Pessimistic error?
 Reduced error pruning?
C0: 11
C1: 3
C0: 2
C1: 4
C0: 14
C1: 3
C0: 2
C1: 2
Don’t prune for both cases
Don’t prune case 1, prune case 2
Case 1:
Case 2:
Depends on validation set
Handling Missing Attribute Values
 Missing values affect decision tree
construction in three different ways:
 Affects how impurity measures are computed
 Affects how to distribute instance with missing
value to child nodes
 Affects how a test instance with missing value
is classified
Computing Impurity Measure
Tid Refund Marital
Status
Taxable
Income Class
1 Yes Single 125K No
2 No Married 100K No
3 No Single 70K No
4 Yes Married 120K No
5 No Divorced 95K Yes
6 No Married 60K No
7 Yes Divorced 220K No
8 No Single 85K Yes
9 No Married 75K No
10 ? Single 90K Yes
10
Class
= Yes
Class
= No
Refund=Yes 0 3
Refund=No 2 4
Refund=? 1 0
Split on Refund:
Entropy(Refund=Yes) = 0
Entropy(Refund=No)
= -(2/6)log(2/6) – (4/6)log(4/6) = 0.9183
Entropy(Children)
= 0.3 (0) + 0.6 (0.9183) = 0.551
Gain = 0.9  (0.8813 – 0.551) = 0.3303
Missing
value
Before Splitting:
Entropy(Parent)
= -0.3 log(0.3)-(0.7)log(0.7) = 0.8813
Distribute Instances
Tid Refund Marital
Status
Taxable
Income Class
1 Yes Single 125K No
2 No Married 100K No
3 No Single 70K No
4 Yes Married 120K No
5 No Divorced 95K Yes
6 No Married 60K No
7 Yes Divorced 220K No
8 No Single 85K Yes
9 No Married 75K No
10
Refund
Yes No
Class=Yes 0
Class=No 3
Cheat=Yes 2
Cheat=No 4
Refund
Yes
Tid Refund Marital
Status
Taxable
Income Class
10 ? Single 90K Yes
10
No
Class=Yes 2 + 6/9
Class=No 4
Probability that Refund=Yes is 3/9
Probability that Refund=No is 6/9
Assign record to the left child with
weight = 3/9 and to the right child
with weight = 6/9
Class=Yes 0 + 3/9
Class=No 3
Classify Instances
Refund
MarSt
TaxInc
YES
NO
NO
NO
Yes
No
Married
Single,
Divorced
< 80K > 80K
Married Single Divorce
d
Total
Class=No 3 1 0 4
Class=Yes 6/9 1 1 2.67
Total 3.67 2 1 6.67
Tid Refund Marital
Status
Taxable
Income Class
11 No ? 85K ?
10
New record:
Probability that Marital Status
= Married is 3.67/6.67
Probability that Marital Status
={Single,Divorced} is 3/6.67
Scalable Decision Tree Induction Methods
 SLIQ (EDBT’96 — Mehta et al.)
 Builds an index for each attribute and only class list and
the current attribute list reside in memory
 SPRINT (VLDB’96 — J. Shafer et al.)
 Constructs an attribute list data structure
 PUBLIC (VLDB’98 — Rastogi & Shim)
 Integrates tree splitting and tree pruning: stop growing the
tree earlier
 RainForest (VLDB’98 — Gehrke, Ramakrishnan &
Ganti)
 Builds an AVC-list (attribute, value, class label)
 BOAT (PODS’99 — Gehrke, Ganti, Ramakrishnan &
Loh)
 Uses bootstrapping to create several small samples

More Related Content

Similar to Decision Tree based Classification - ML.ppt

Basic Classification.pptx
Basic Classification.pptxBasic Classification.pptx
Basic Classification.pptx
PerumalPitchandi
 
Classification
ClassificationClassification
Classification
Anurag jain
 
chap4_basic_classification(2).ppt
chap4_basic_classification(2).pptchap4_basic_classification(2).ppt
chap4_basic_classification(2).ppt
ssuserfdf196
 
chap4_basic_classification.ppt
chap4_basic_classification.pptchap4_basic_classification.ppt
chap4_basic_classification.ppt
BantiParsaniya
 
Datamining with nb
Datamining with nbDatamining with nb
Datamining with nb
Luis Goldster
 
Datamining with nb
Datamining with nbDatamining with nb
Datamining with nb
James Wong
 
Datamining with nb
Datamining with nbDatamining with nb
Datamining with nb
Fraboni Ec
 
Datamining with nb
Datamining with nbDatamining with nb
Datamining with nb
Tony Nguyen
 
Datamining with nb
Datamining with nbDatamining with nb
Datamining with nb
Young Alista
 
Datamining with nb
Datamining with nbDatamining with nb
Datamining with nb
David Hoen
 
Datamining withnb
Datamining withnbDatamining withnb
Datamining withnb
Harry Potter
 
Dr. Oner CelepcikayITS 632ITS 632Week 4Classification
Dr. Oner CelepcikayITS 632ITS 632Week 4ClassificationDr. Oner CelepcikayITS 632ITS 632Week 4Classification
Dr. Oner CelepcikayITS 632ITS 632Week 4Classification
DustiBuckner14
 
Classification techniques in data mining
Classification techniques in data miningClassification techniques in data mining
Classification techniques in data mining
Kamal Acharya
 
Data Mining Lecture_11.pptx
Data Mining Lecture_11.pptxData Mining Lecture_11.pptx
Data Mining Lecture_11.pptx
Subrata Kumer Paul
 
inmlk;lklkjlk;lklkjlklkojhhkljkbjlkjhbtroDM.ppt
inmlk;lklkjlk;lklkjlklkojhhkljkbjlkjhbtroDM.pptinmlk;lklkjlk;lklkjlklkojhhkljkbjlkjhbtroDM.ppt
inmlk;lklkjlk;lklkjlklkojhhkljkbjlkjhbtroDM.ppt
JITENDER773791
 
Acceptance Test-Driven Development: Mastering Agile Testing
Acceptance Test-Driven Development: Mastering Agile TestingAcceptance Test-Driven Development: Mastering Agile Testing
Acceptance Test-Driven Development: Mastering Agile Testing
TechWell
 
NN Classififcation Neural Network NN.pptx
NN Classififcation   Neural Network NN.pptxNN Classififcation   Neural Network NN.pptx
NN Classififcation Neural Network NN.pptx
cmpt cmpt
 
introDM.ppt
introDM.pptintroDM.ppt
introDM.ppt
Arumugam Prakash
 
introDMintroDMintroDMintroDMintroDMintroDM.ppt
introDMintroDMintroDMintroDMintroDMintroDM.pptintroDMintroDMintroDMintroDMintroDMintroDM.ppt
introDMintroDMintroDMintroDMintroDMintroDM.ppt
DEEPAK948083
 
The SaaS business model and metrics
The SaaS business model and metricsThe SaaS business model and metrics
The SaaS business model and metrics
David Skok
 

Similar to Decision Tree based Classification - ML.ppt (20)

Basic Classification.pptx
Basic Classification.pptxBasic Classification.pptx
Basic Classification.pptx
 
Classification
ClassificationClassification
Classification
 
chap4_basic_classification(2).ppt
chap4_basic_classification(2).pptchap4_basic_classification(2).ppt
chap4_basic_classification(2).ppt
 
chap4_basic_classification.ppt
chap4_basic_classification.pptchap4_basic_classification.ppt
chap4_basic_classification.ppt
 
Datamining with nb
Datamining with nbDatamining with nb
Datamining with nb
 
Datamining with nb
Datamining with nbDatamining with nb
Datamining with nb
 
Datamining with nb
Datamining with nbDatamining with nb
Datamining with nb
 
Datamining with nb
Datamining with nbDatamining with nb
Datamining with nb
 
Datamining with nb
Datamining with nbDatamining with nb
Datamining with nb
 
Datamining with nb
Datamining with nbDatamining with nb
Datamining with nb
 
Datamining withnb
Datamining withnbDatamining withnb
Datamining withnb
 
Dr. Oner CelepcikayITS 632ITS 632Week 4Classification
Dr. Oner CelepcikayITS 632ITS 632Week 4ClassificationDr. Oner CelepcikayITS 632ITS 632Week 4Classification
Dr. Oner CelepcikayITS 632ITS 632Week 4Classification
 
Classification techniques in data mining
Classification techniques in data miningClassification techniques in data mining
Classification techniques in data mining
 
Data Mining Lecture_11.pptx
Data Mining Lecture_11.pptxData Mining Lecture_11.pptx
Data Mining Lecture_11.pptx
 
inmlk;lklkjlk;lklkjlklkojhhkljkbjlkjhbtroDM.ppt
inmlk;lklkjlk;lklkjlklkojhhkljkbjlkjhbtroDM.pptinmlk;lklkjlk;lklkjlklkojhhkljkbjlkjhbtroDM.ppt
inmlk;lklkjlk;lklkjlklkojhhkljkbjlkjhbtroDM.ppt
 
Acceptance Test-Driven Development: Mastering Agile Testing
Acceptance Test-Driven Development: Mastering Agile TestingAcceptance Test-Driven Development: Mastering Agile Testing
Acceptance Test-Driven Development: Mastering Agile Testing
 
NN Classififcation Neural Network NN.pptx
NN Classififcation   Neural Network NN.pptxNN Classififcation   Neural Network NN.pptx
NN Classififcation Neural Network NN.pptx
 
introDM.ppt
introDM.pptintroDM.ppt
introDM.ppt
 
introDMintroDMintroDMintroDMintroDMintroDM.ppt
introDMintroDMintroDMintroDMintroDMintroDM.pptintroDMintroDMintroDMintroDMintroDMintroDM.ppt
introDMintroDMintroDMintroDMintroDMintroDM.ppt
 
The SaaS business model and metrics
The SaaS business model and metricsThe SaaS business model and metrics
The SaaS business model and metrics
 

Recently uploaded

Update 40 models( Solar Cell ) in SPICE PARK(JUL2024)
Update 40 models( Solar Cell ) in SPICE PARK(JUL2024)Update 40 models( Solar Cell ) in SPICE PARK(JUL2024)
Update 40 models( Solar Cell ) in SPICE PARK(JUL2024)
Tsuyoshi Horigome
 
🔥Independent Call Girls In Pune 💯Call Us 🔝 7014168258 🔝💃Independent Pune Esco...
🔥Independent Call Girls In Pune 💯Call Us 🔝 7014168258 🔝💃Independent Pune Esco...🔥Independent Call Girls In Pune 💯Call Us 🔝 7014168258 🔝💃Independent Pune Esco...
🔥Independent Call Girls In Pune 💯Call Us 🔝 7014168258 🔝💃Independent Pune Esco...
AK47
 
Better Builder Magazine, Issue 49 / Spring 2024
Better Builder Magazine, Issue 49 / Spring 2024Better Builder Magazine, Issue 49 / Spring 2024
Better Builder Magazine, Issue 49 / Spring 2024
Better Builder Magazine
 
Microsoft Azure AD architecture and features
Microsoft Azure AD architecture and featuresMicrosoft Azure AD architecture and features
Microsoft Azure AD architecture and features
ssuser381403
 
My Airframe Metallic Design Capability Studies..pdf
My Airframe Metallic Design Capability Studies..pdfMy Airframe Metallic Design Capability Studies..pdf
My Airframe Metallic Design Capability Studies..pdf
Geoffrey Wardle. MSc. MSc. Snr.MAIAA
 
Call Girls Goa (india) ☎️ +91-7426014248 Goa Call Girl
Call Girls Goa (india) ☎️ +91-7426014248 Goa Call GirlCall Girls Goa (india) ☎️ +91-7426014248 Goa Call Girl
Call Girls Goa (india) ☎️ +91-7426014248 Goa Call Girl
sapna sharmap11
 
Online train ticket booking system project.pdf
Online train ticket booking system project.pdfOnline train ticket booking system project.pdf
Online train ticket booking system project.pdf
Kamal Acharya
 
AN INTRODUCTION OF AI & SEARCHING TECHIQUES
AN INTRODUCTION OF AI & SEARCHING TECHIQUESAN INTRODUCTION OF AI & SEARCHING TECHIQUES
AN INTRODUCTION OF AI & SEARCHING TECHIQUES
drshikhapandey2022
 
Asymmetrical Repulsion Magnet Motor Ratio 6-7.pdf
Asymmetrical Repulsion Magnet Motor Ratio 6-7.pdfAsymmetrical Repulsion Magnet Motor Ratio 6-7.pdf
Asymmetrical Repulsion Magnet Motor Ratio 6-7.pdf
felixwold
 
一比一原版(psu学位证书)美国匹兹堡州立大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(psu学位证书)美国匹兹堡州立大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(psu学位证书)美国匹兹堡州立大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(psu学位证书)美国匹兹堡州立大学毕业证如何办理
nonods
 
Call Girls Nagpur 8824825030 Escort In Nagpur service 24X7
Call Girls Nagpur 8824825030 Escort In Nagpur service 24X7Call Girls Nagpur 8824825030 Escort In Nagpur service 24X7
Call Girls Nagpur 8824825030 Escort In Nagpur service 24X7
sexytaniya455
 
An In-Depth Exploration of Natural Language Processing: Evolution, Applicatio...
An In-Depth Exploration of Natural Language Processing: Evolution, Applicatio...An In-Depth Exploration of Natural Language Processing: Evolution, Applicatio...
An In-Depth Exploration of Natural Language Processing: Evolution, Applicatio...
DharmaBanothu
 
CSP_Study - Notes (Paul McNeill) 2017.pdf
CSP_Study - Notes (Paul McNeill) 2017.pdfCSP_Study - Notes (Paul McNeill) 2017.pdf
CSP_Study - Notes (Paul McNeill) 2017.pdf
Ismail Sultan
 
🚺ANJALI MEHTA High Profile Call Girls Ahmedabad 💯Call Us 🔝 9352988975 🔝💃Top C...
🚺ANJALI MEHTA High Profile Call Girls Ahmedabad 💯Call Us 🔝 9352988975 🔝💃Top C...🚺ANJALI MEHTA High Profile Call Girls Ahmedabad 💯Call Us 🔝 9352988975 🔝💃Top C...
🚺ANJALI MEHTA High Profile Call Girls Ahmedabad 💯Call Us 🔝 9352988975 🔝💃Top C...
dulbh kashyap
 
Call Girls In Tiruppur 👯‍♀️ 7339748667 🔥 Free Home Delivery Within 30 Minutes
Call Girls In Tiruppur 👯‍♀️ 7339748667 🔥 Free Home Delivery Within 30 MinutesCall Girls In Tiruppur 👯‍♀️ 7339748667 🔥 Free Home Delivery Within 30 Minutes
Call Girls In Tiruppur 👯‍♀️ 7339748667 🔥 Free Home Delivery Within 30 Minutes
kamka4105
 
Call Girls Chandigarh 🔥 7014168258 🔥 Real Fun With Sexual Girl Available 24/7...
Call Girls Chandigarh 🔥 7014168258 🔥 Real Fun With Sexual Girl Available 24/7...Call Girls Chandigarh 🔥 7014168258 🔥 Real Fun With Sexual Girl Available 24/7...
Call Girls Chandigarh 🔥 7014168258 🔥 Real Fun With Sexual Girl Available 24/7...
shourabjaat424
 
SELENIUM CONF -PALLAVI SHARMA - 2024.pdf
SELENIUM CONF -PALLAVI SHARMA - 2024.pdfSELENIUM CONF -PALLAVI SHARMA - 2024.pdf
SELENIUM CONF -PALLAVI SHARMA - 2024.pdf
Pallavi Sharma
 
Intuit CRAFT demonstration presentation for sde
Intuit CRAFT demonstration presentation for sdeIntuit CRAFT demonstration presentation for sde
Intuit CRAFT demonstration presentation for sde
ShivangMishra54
 
Technological Innovation Management And Entrepreneurship-1.pdf
Technological Innovation Management And Entrepreneurship-1.pdfTechnological Innovation Management And Entrepreneurship-1.pdf
Technological Innovation Management And Entrepreneurship-1.pdf
tanujaharish2
 
SPICE PARK JUL2024 ( 6,866 SPICE Models )
SPICE PARK JUL2024 ( 6,866 SPICE Models )SPICE PARK JUL2024 ( 6,866 SPICE Models )
SPICE PARK JUL2024 ( 6,866 SPICE Models )
Tsuyoshi Horigome
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Update 40 models( Solar Cell ) in SPICE PARK(JUL2024)
Update 40 models( Solar Cell ) in SPICE PARK(JUL2024)Update 40 models( Solar Cell ) in SPICE PARK(JUL2024)
Update 40 models( Solar Cell ) in SPICE PARK(JUL2024)
 
🔥Independent Call Girls In Pune 💯Call Us 🔝 7014168258 🔝💃Independent Pune Esco...
🔥Independent Call Girls In Pune 💯Call Us 🔝 7014168258 🔝💃Independent Pune Esco...🔥Independent Call Girls In Pune 💯Call Us 🔝 7014168258 🔝💃Independent Pune Esco...
🔥Independent Call Girls In Pune 💯Call Us 🔝 7014168258 🔝💃Independent Pune Esco...
 
Better Builder Magazine, Issue 49 / Spring 2024
Better Builder Magazine, Issue 49 / Spring 2024Better Builder Magazine, Issue 49 / Spring 2024
Better Builder Magazine, Issue 49 / Spring 2024
 
Microsoft Azure AD architecture and features
Microsoft Azure AD architecture and featuresMicrosoft Azure AD architecture and features
Microsoft Azure AD architecture and features
 
My Airframe Metallic Design Capability Studies..pdf
My Airframe Metallic Design Capability Studies..pdfMy Airframe Metallic Design Capability Studies..pdf
My Airframe Metallic Design Capability Studies..pdf
 
Call Girls Goa (india) ☎️ +91-7426014248 Goa Call Girl
Call Girls Goa (india) ☎️ +91-7426014248 Goa Call GirlCall Girls Goa (india) ☎️ +91-7426014248 Goa Call Girl
Call Girls Goa (india) ☎️ +91-7426014248 Goa Call Girl
 
Online train ticket booking system project.pdf
Online train ticket booking system project.pdfOnline train ticket booking system project.pdf
Online train ticket booking system project.pdf
 
AN INTRODUCTION OF AI & SEARCHING TECHIQUES
AN INTRODUCTION OF AI & SEARCHING TECHIQUESAN INTRODUCTION OF AI & SEARCHING TECHIQUES
AN INTRODUCTION OF AI & SEARCHING TECHIQUES
 
Asymmetrical Repulsion Magnet Motor Ratio 6-7.pdf
Asymmetrical Repulsion Magnet Motor Ratio 6-7.pdfAsymmetrical Repulsion Magnet Motor Ratio 6-7.pdf
Asymmetrical Repulsion Magnet Motor Ratio 6-7.pdf
 
一比一原版(psu学位证书)美国匹兹堡州立大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(psu学位证书)美国匹兹堡州立大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(psu学位证书)美国匹兹堡州立大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(psu学位证书)美国匹兹堡州立大学毕业证如何办理
 
Call Girls Nagpur 8824825030 Escort In Nagpur service 24X7
Call Girls Nagpur 8824825030 Escort In Nagpur service 24X7Call Girls Nagpur 8824825030 Escort In Nagpur service 24X7
Call Girls Nagpur 8824825030 Escort In Nagpur service 24X7
 
An In-Depth Exploration of Natural Language Processing: Evolution, Applicatio...
An In-Depth Exploration of Natural Language Processing: Evolution, Applicatio...An In-Depth Exploration of Natural Language Processing: Evolution, Applicatio...
An In-Depth Exploration of Natural Language Processing: Evolution, Applicatio...
 
CSP_Study - Notes (Paul McNeill) 2017.pdf
CSP_Study - Notes (Paul McNeill) 2017.pdfCSP_Study - Notes (Paul McNeill) 2017.pdf
CSP_Study - Notes (Paul McNeill) 2017.pdf
 
🚺ANJALI MEHTA High Profile Call Girls Ahmedabad 💯Call Us 🔝 9352988975 🔝💃Top C...
🚺ANJALI MEHTA High Profile Call Girls Ahmedabad 💯Call Us 🔝 9352988975 🔝💃Top C...🚺ANJALI MEHTA High Profile Call Girls Ahmedabad 💯Call Us 🔝 9352988975 🔝💃Top C...
🚺ANJALI MEHTA High Profile Call Girls Ahmedabad 💯Call Us 🔝 9352988975 🔝💃Top C...
 
Call Girls In Tiruppur 👯‍♀️ 7339748667 🔥 Free Home Delivery Within 30 Minutes
Call Girls In Tiruppur 👯‍♀️ 7339748667 🔥 Free Home Delivery Within 30 MinutesCall Girls In Tiruppur 👯‍♀️ 7339748667 🔥 Free Home Delivery Within 30 Minutes
Call Girls In Tiruppur 👯‍♀️ 7339748667 🔥 Free Home Delivery Within 30 Minutes
 
Call Girls Chandigarh 🔥 7014168258 🔥 Real Fun With Sexual Girl Available 24/7...
Call Girls Chandigarh 🔥 7014168258 🔥 Real Fun With Sexual Girl Available 24/7...Call Girls Chandigarh 🔥 7014168258 🔥 Real Fun With Sexual Girl Available 24/7...
Call Girls Chandigarh 🔥 7014168258 🔥 Real Fun With Sexual Girl Available 24/7...
 
SELENIUM CONF -PALLAVI SHARMA - 2024.pdf
SELENIUM CONF -PALLAVI SHARMA - 2024.pdfSELENIUM CONF -PALLAVI SHARMA - 2024.pdf
SELENIUM CONF -PALLAVI SHARMA - 2024.pdf
 
Intuit CRAFT demonstration presentation for sde
Intuit CRAFT demonstration presentation for sdeIntuit CRAFT demonstration presentation for sde
Intuit CRAFT demonstration presentation for sde
 
Technological Innovation Management And Entrepreneurship-1.pdf
Technological Innovation Management And Entrepreneurship-1.pdfTechnological Innovation Management And Entrepreneurship-1.pdf
Technological Innovation Management And Entrepreneurship-1.pdf
 
SPICE PARK JUL2024 ( 6,866 SPICE Models )
SPICE PARK JUL2024 ( 6,866 SPICE Models )SPICE PARK JUL2024 ( 6,866 SPICE Models )
SPICE PARK JUL2024 ( 6,866 SPICE Models )
 

Decision Tree based Classification - ML.ppt

  • 1. Classification: Basic Concepts and Decision Trees
  • 3. Classification: Definition  Given a collection of records (training set )  Each record contains a set of attributes, one of the attributes is the class.  Find a model for class attribute as a function of the values of other attributes.  Goal: previously unseen records should be assigned a class as accurately as possible.  A test set is used to determine the accuracy of the model. Usually, the given data set is divided into training and test sets, with training set used to build the model and test set used to validate it.
  • 4. Illustrating Classification Task Apply Model Induction Deduction Learn Model Model Tid Attrib1 Attrib2 Attrib3 Class 1 Yes Large 125K No 2 No Medium 100K No 3 No Small 70K No 4 Yes Medium 120K No 5 No Large 95K Yes 6 No Medium 60K No 7 Yes Large 220K No 8 No Small 85K Yes 9 No Medium 75K No 10 No Small 90K Yes 10 Tid Attrib1 Attrib2 Attrib3 Class 11 No Small 55K ? 12 Yes Medium 80K ? 13 Yes Large 110K ? 14 No Small 95K ? 15 No Large 67K ? 10 Test Set Learning algorithm Training Set
  • 5. Examples of Classification Task  Predicting tumor cells as benign or malignant  Classifying credit card transactions as legitimate or fraudulent  Classifying secondary structures of protein as alpha-helix, beta-sheet, or random coil  Categorizing news stories as finance, weather, entertainment, sports, etc
  • 6. Classification Using Distance  Place items in class to which they are “closest”.  Must determine distance between an item and a class.  Classes represented by  Centroid: Central value.  Medoid: Representative point.  Individual points  Algorithm: KNN
  • 7. K Nearest Neighbor (KNN):  Training set includes classes.  Examine K items near item to be classified.  New item placed in class with the most number of close items.  O(q) for each tuple to be classified. (Here q is the size of the training set.)
  • 8. KNN
  • 9. Classification Techniques  Decision Tree based Methods  Rule-based Methods  Memory based reasoning  Neural Networks  Naïve Bayes and Bayesian Belief Networks  Support Vector Machines
  • 10. Example of a Decision Tree Tid Refund Marital Status Taxable Income Cheat 1 Yes Single 125K No 2 No Married 100K No 3 No Single 70K No 4 Yes Married 120K No 5 No Divorced 95K Yes 6 No Married 60K No 7 Yes Divorced 220K No 8 No Single 85K Yes 9 No Married 75K No 10 No Single 90K Yes 10 Refund MarSt TaxInc YES NO NO NO Yes No Married Single, Divorced < 80K > 80K Splitting Attributes Training Data Model: Decision Tree
  • 11. Another Example of Decision Tree Tid Refund Marital Status Taxable Income Cheat 1 Yes Single 125K No 2 No Married 100K No 3 No Single 70K No 4 Yes Married 120K No 5 No Divorced 95K Yes 6 No Married 60K No 7 Yes Divorced 220K No 8 No Single 85K Yes 9 No Married 75K No 10 No Single 90K Yes 10 MarSt Refund TaxInc YES NO NO NO Yes No Married Single, Divorced < 80K > 80K There could be more than one tree that fits the same data!
  • 12. Decision Tree Classification Task Apply Model Induction Deduction Learn Model Model Tid Attrib1 Attrib2 Attrib3 Class 1 Yes Large 125K No 2 No Medium 100K No 3 No Small 70K No 4 Yes Medium 120K No 5 No Large 95K Yes 6 No Medium 60K No 7 Yes Large 220K No 8 No Small 85K Yes 9 No Medium 75K No 10 No Small 90K Yes 10 Tid Attrib1 Attrib2 Attrib3 Class 11 No Small 55K ? 12 Yes Medium 80K ? 13 Yes Large 110K ? 14 No Small 95K ? 15 No Large 67K ? 10 Test Set Tree Induction algorithm Training Set Decision Tree
  • 13. Apply Model to Test Data Refund MarSt TaxInc YES NO NO NO Yes No Married Single, Divorced < 80K > 80K Refund Marital Status Taxable Income Cheat No Married 80K ? 10 Test Data Start from the root of tree.
  • 14. Apply Model to Test Data Refund MarSt TaxInc YES NO NO NO Yes No Married Single, Divorced < 80K > 80K Refund Marital Status Taxable Income Cheat No Married 80K ? 10 Test Data
  • 15. Apply Model to Test Data Refund MarSt TaxInc YES NO NO NO Yes No Married Single, Divorced < 80K > 80K Refund Marital Status Taxable Income Cheat No Married 80K ? 10 Test Data
  • 16. Apply Model to Test Data Refund MarSt TaxInc YES NO NO NO Yes No Married Single, Divorced < 80K > 80K Refund Marital Status Taxable Income Cheat No Married 80K ? 10 Test Data
  • 17. Apply Model to Test Data Refund MarSt TaxInc YES NO NO NO Yes No Married Single, Divorced < 80K > 80K Refund Marital Status Taxable Income Cheat No Married 80K ? 10 Test Data
  • 18. Apply Model to Test Data Refund MarSt TaxInc YES NO NO NO Yes No Married Single, Divorced < 80K > 80K Refund Marital Status Taxable Income Cheat No Married 80K ? 10 Test Data Assign Cheat to “No”
  • 19. Decision Tree Classification Task Apply Model Induction Deduction Learn Model Model Tid Attrib1 Attrib2 Attrib3 Class 1 Yes Large 125K No 2 No Medium 100K No 3 No Small 70K No 4 Yes Medium 120K No 5 No Large 95K Yes 6 No Medium 60K No 7 Yes Large 220K No 8 No Small 85K Yes 9 No Medium 75K No 10 No Small 90K Yes 10 Tid Attrib1 Attrib2 Attrib3 Class 11 No Small 55K ? 12 Yes Medium 80K ? 13 Yes Large 110K ? 14 No Small 95K ? 15 No Large 67K ? 10 Test Set Tree Induction algorithm Training Set Decision Tree
  • 20. Decision Tree Induction  Many Algorithms:  Hunt’s Algorithm (one of the earliest)  CART  ID3, C4.5  SLIQ,SPRINT
  • 21. General Structure of Hunt’s Algorithm  Let Dt be the set of training records that reach a node t  General Procedure:  If Dt contains records that belong the same class yt, then t is a leaf node labeled as yt  If Dt is an empty set, then t is a leaf node labeled by the default class, yd  If Dt contains records that belong to more than one class, use an attribute test to split the data into smaller subsets. Recursively apply the procedure to each subset. Tid Refund Marital Status Taxable Income Cheat 1 Yes Single 125K No 2 No Married 100K No 3 No Single 70K No 4 Yes Married 120K No 5 No Divorced 95K Yes 6 No Married 60K No 7 Yes Divorced 220K No 8 No Single 85K Yes 9 No Married 75K No 10 No Single 90K Yes 10 Dt ?
  • 22. Hunt’s Algorithm Don’t Cheat Refund Don’t Cheat Don’t Cheat Yes No Refund Don’t Cheat Yes No Marital Status Don’t Cheat Cheat Single, Divorced Married Taxable Income Don’t Cheat < 80K >= 80K Refund Don’t Cheat Yes No Marital Status Don’t Cheat Cheat Single, Divorced Married Tid Refund Marital Status Taxable Income Cheat 1 Yes Single 125K No 2 No Married 100K No 3 No Single 70K No 4 Yes Married 120K No 5 No Divorced 95K Yes 6 No Married 60K No 7 Yes Divorced 220K No 8 No Single 85K Yes 9 No Married 75K No 10 No Single 90K Yes 10
  • 23. Tree Induction  Greedy strategy.  Split the records based on an attribute test that optimizes certain criterion.  Issues  Determine how to split the records  How to specify the attribute test condition?  How to determine the best split?  Determine when to stop splitting
  • 24. Tree Induction  Greedy strategy.  Split the records based on an attribute test that optimizes certain criterion.  Issues  Determine how to split the records  How to specify the attribute test condition?  How to determine the best split?  Determine when to stop splitting
  • 25. How to Specify Test Condition?  Depends on attribute types  Nominal  Ordinal  Continuous  Depends on number of ways to split  2-way split  Multi-way split
  • 26. Splitting Based on Nominal Attributes  Multi-way split: Use as many partitions as distinct values.  Binary split: Divides values into two subsets. Need to find optimal partitioning. CarType Family Sports Luxury CarType {Family, Luxury} {Sports} CarType {Sports, Luxury} {Family} OR
  • 27.  Multi-way split: Use as many partitions as distinct values.  Binary split: Divides values into two subsets. Need to find optimal partitioning.  What about this split? Splitting Based on Ordinal Attributes Size Small Medium Large Size {Medium, Large} {Small} Size {Small, Medium} {Large} OR Size {Small, Large} {Medium}
  • 28. Splitting Based on Continuous Attributes  Different ways of handling  Discretization to form an ordinal categorical attribute  Static – discretize once at the beginning  Dynamic – ranges can be found by equal interval bucketing, equal frequency bucketing (percentiles), or clustering.  Binary Decision: (A < v) or (A  v)  consider all possible splits and finds the best cut  can be more compute intensive
  • 29. Splitting Based on Continuous Attributes Taxable Income > 80K? Yes No Taxable Income? (i) Binary split (ii) Multi-way split < 10K [10K,25K) [25K,50K) [50K,80K) > 80K
  • 30. Tree Induction  Greedy strategy.  Split the records based on an attribute test that optimizes certain criterion.  Issues  Determine how to split the records  How to specify the attribute test condition?  How to determine the best split?  Determine when to stop splitting
  • 31. How to determine the Best Split Own Car? C0: 6 C1: 4 C0: 4 C1: 6 C0: 1 C1: 3 C0: 8 C1: 0 C0: 1 C1: 7 Car Type? C0: 1 C1: 0 C0: 1 C1: 0 C0: 0 C1: 1 Student ID? ... Yes No Family Sports Luxury c1 c10 c20 C0: 0 C1: 1 ... c11 Before Splitting: 10 records of class 0, 10 records of class 1 Which test condition is the best?
  • 32. How to determine the Best Split  Greedy approach:  Nodes with homogeneous class distribution are preferred  Need a measure of node impurity: C0: 5 C1: 5 C0: 9 C1: 1 Non-homogeneous, High degree of impurity Homogeneous, Low degree of impurity
  • 33. Measures of Node Impurity  Gini Index  Entropy  Misclassification error
  • 34. How to Find the Best Split B? Yes No Node N3 Node N4 A? Yes No Node N1 Node N2 Before Splitting: C0 N10 C1 N11 C0 N20 C1 N21 C0 N30 C1 N31 C0 N40 C1 N41 C0 N00 C1 N01 M0 M1 M2 M3 M4 M12 M34 Gain = M0 – M12 vs M0 – M34
  • 35. Measure of Impurity: GINI  Gini Index for a given node t : (NOTE: p( j | t) is the relative frequency of class j at node t).  Maximum (1 - 1/nc) when records are equally distributed among all classes, implying least interesting information  Minimum (0.0) when all records belong to one class, implying most interesting information    j t j p t GINI 2 )] | ( [ 1 ) ( C1 0 C2 6 Gini=0.000 C1 2 C2 4 Gini=0.444 C1 3 C2 3 Gini=0.500 C1 1 C2 5 Gini=0.278
  • 36. Examples for computing GINI C1 0 C2 6 C1 2 C2 4 C1 1 C2 5 P(C1) = 0/6 = 0 P(C2) = 6/6 = 1 Gini = 1 – P(C1)2 – P(C2)2 = 1 – 0 – 1 = 0    j t j p t GINI 2 )] | ( [ 1 ) ( P(C1) = 1/6 P(C2) = 5/6 Gini = 1 – (1/6)2 – (5/6)2 = 0.278 P(C1) = 2/6 P(C2) = 4/6 Gini = 1 – (2/6)2 – (4/6)2 = 0.444
  • 37. Splitting Based on GINI  Used in CART, SLIQ, SPRINT.  When a node p is split into k partitions (children), the quality of split is computed as, where, ni = number of records at child i, n = number of records at node p.    k i i split i GINI n n GINI 1 ) (
  • 38. Binary Attributes: Computing GINI Index  Splits into two partitions  Effect of Weighing partitions:  Larger and Purer Partitions are sought for. B? Yes No Node N1 Node N2 Parent C1 6 C2 6 Gini = 0.500 N1 N2 C1 5 1 C2 2 4 Gini=0.333 Gini(N1) = 1 – (5/6)2 – (2/6)2 = 0.194 Gini(N2) = 1 – (1/6)2 – (4/6)2 = 0.528 Gini(Children) = 7/12 * 0.194 + 5/12 * 0.528 = 0.333
  • 39. Categorical Attributes: Computing Gini Index  For each distinct value, gather counts for each class in the dataset  Use the count matrix to make decisions CarType {Sports, Luxury} {Family} C1 3 1 C2 2 4 Gini 0.400 CarType {Sports} {Family, Luxury} C1 2 2 C2 1 5 Gini 0.419 CarType Family Sports Luxury C1 1 2 1 C2 4 1 1 Gini 0.393 Multi-way split Two-way split (find best partition of values)
  • 40. Continuous Attributes: Computing Gini Index  Use Binary Decisions based on one value  Several Choices for the splitting value  Number of possible splitting values = Number of distinct values  Each splitting value has a count matrix associated with it  Class counts in each of the partitions, A < v and A  v  Simple method to choose best v  For each v, scan the database to gather count matrix and compute its Gini index  Computationally Inefficient! Repetition of work. Tid Refund Marital Status Taxable Income Cheat 1 Yes Single 125K No 2 No Married 100K No 3 No Single 70K No 4 Yes Married 120K No 5 No Divorced 95K Yes 6 No Married 60K No 7 Yes Divorced 220K No 8 No Single 85K Yes 9 No Married 75K No 10 No Single 90K Yes 10 Taxable Income > 80K? Yes No
  • 41. Continuous Attributes: Computing Gini Index...  For efficient computation: for each attribute,  Sort the attribute on values  Linearly scan these values, each time updating the count matrix and computing gini index  Choose the split position that has the least gini index Cheat No No No Yes Yes Yes No No No No Taxable Income 60 70 75 85 90 95 100 120 125 220 55 65 72 80 87 92 97 110 122 172 230 <= > <= > <= > <= > <= > <= > <= > <= > <= > <= > <= > Yes 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 1 2 2 1 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 No 0 7 1 6 2 5 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 4 3 5 2 6 1 7 0 Gini 0.420 0.400 0.375 0.343 0.417 0.400 0.300 0.343 0.375 0.400 0.420 Split Positions Sorted Values
  • 42. Alternative Splitting Criteria based on INFO  Entropy at a given node t: (NOTE: p( j | t) is the relative frequency of class j at node t).  Measures homogeneity of a node.  Maximum (log nc) when records are equally distributed among all classes implying least information  Minimum (0.0) when all records belong to one class, implying most information  Entropy based computations are similar to the GINI index computations    j t j p t j p t Entropy ) | ( log ) | ( ) (
  • 43. Examples for computing Entropy C1 0 C2 6 C1 2 C2 4 C1 1 C2 5 P(C1) = 0/6 = 0 P(C2) = 6/6 = 1 Entropy = – 0 log 0 – 1 log 1 = – 0 – 0 = 0 P(C1) = 1/6 P(C2) = 5/6 Entropy = – (1/6) log2 (1/6) – (5/6) log2 (1/6) = 0.65 P(C1) = 2/6 P(C2) = 4/6 Entropy = – (2/6) log2 (2/6) – (4/6) log2 (4/6) = 0.92    j t j p t j p t Entropy ) | ( log ) | ( ) ( 2
  • 44. Splitting Based on INFO...  Information Gain: Parent Node, p is split into k partitions; ni is number of records in partition i  Measures Reduction in Entropy achieved because of the split. Choose the split that achieves most reduction (maximizes GAIN)  Used in ID3 and C4.5  Disadvantage: Tends to prefer splits that result in large number of partitions, each being small but pure.           k i i split i Entropy n n p Entropy GAIN 1 ) ( ) (
  • 45. Splitting Based on INFO...  Gain Ratio: Parent Node, p is split into k partitions ni is the number of records in partition i  Adjusts Information Gain by the entropy of the partitioning (SplitINFO). Higher entropy partitioning (large number of small partitions) is penalized!  Used in C4.5  Designed to overcome the disadvantage of Information Gain SplitINFO GAIN GainRATIO Split split      k i i i n n n n SplitINFO 1 log
  • 46. Splitting Criteria based on Classification Error  Classification error at a node t :  Measures misclassification error made by a node.  Maximum (1 - 1/nc) when records are equally distributed among all classes, implying least interesting information  Minimum (0.0) when all records belong to one class, implying most interesting information ) | ( max 1 ) ( t i P t Error i  
  • 47. Examples for Computing Error C1 0 C2 6 C1 2 C2 4 C1 1 C2 5 P(C1) = 0/6 = 0 P(C2) = 6/6 = 1 Error = 1 – max (0, 1) = 1 – 1 = 0 P(C1) = 1/6 P(C2) = 5/6 Error = 1 – max (1/6, 5/6) = 1 – 5/6 = 1/6 P(C1) = 2/6 P(C2) = 4/6 Error = 1 – max (2/6, 4/6) = 1 – 4/6 = 1/3 ) | ( max 1 ) ( t i P t Error i  
  • 48. Comparison among Splitting Criteria For a 2-class problem:
  • 49. Misclassification Error vs Gini A? Yes No Node N1 Node N2 Parent C1 7 C2 3 Gini = 0.42 N1 N2 C1 3 4 C2 0 3 Gini(N1) = 1 – (3/3)2 – (0/3)2 = 0 Gini(N2) = 1 – (4/7)2 – (3/7)2 = 0.489 Gini(Children) = 3/10 * 0 + 7/10 * 0.489 = 0.342
  • 50. Tree Induction  Greedy strategy.  Split the records based on an attribute test that optimizes certain criterion.  Issues  Determine how to split the records  How to specify the attribute test condition?  How to determine the best split?  Determine when to stop splitting
  • 51. Stopping Criteria for Tree Induction  Stop expanding a node when all the records belong to the same class  Stop expanding a node when all the records have similar attribute values  Early termination (to be discussed later)
  • 52. Decision Tree Based Classification  Advantages:  Inexpensive to construct  Extremely fast at classifying unknown records  Easy to interpret for small-sized trees  Accuracy is comparable to other classification techniques for many simple data sets
  • 53. Example: C4.5  Simple depth-first construction.  Uses Information Gain  Sorts Continuous Attributes at each node.  Needs entire data to fit in memory.  Unsuitable for Large Datasets.  Needs out-of-core sorting.  You can download the software from: http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~quinlan/c4.5r8.tar. gz
  • 54. Practical Issues of Classification  Underfitting and Overfitting  Missing Values  Costs of Classification
  • 55. Underfitting and Overfitting (Example) 500 circular and 500 triangular data points. Circular points: 0.5  sqrt(x1 2+x2 2)  1 Triangular points: sqrt(x1 2+x2 2) > 0.5 or sqrt(x1 2+x2 2) < 1
  • 56. Underfitting and Overfitting Overfitting Underfitting: when model is too simple, both training and test errors are large
  • 57. Overfitting due to Noise Decision boundary is distorted by noise point
  • 58. Overfitting due to Insufficient Examples Lack of data points in the lower half of the diagram makes it difficult to predict correctly the class labels of that region - Insufficient number of training records in the region causes the decision tree to predict the test examples using other training records that are irrelevant to the classification task
  • 59. Notes on Overfitting  Overfitting results in decision trees that are more complex than necessary  Training error no longer provides a good estimate of how well the tree will perform on previously unseen records  Need new ways for estimating errors
  • 60. Estimating Generalization Errors  Re-substitution errors: error on training ( e(t) )  Generalization errors: error on testing ( e’(t))  Methods for estimating generalization errors:  Optimistic approach: e’(t) = e(t)  Pessimistic approach:  For each leaf node: e’(t) = (e(t)+0.5)  Total errors: e’(T) = e(T) + N  0.5 (N: number of leaf nodes)  For a tree with 30 leaf nodes and 10 errors on training (out of 1000 instances): Training error = 10/1000 = 1% Generalization error = (10 + 300.5)/1000 = 2.5%  Reduced error pruning (REP):  uses validation data set to estimate generalization error
  • 61. Occam’s Razor  Given two models of similar generalization errors, one should prefer the simpler model over the more complex model  For complex models, there is a greater chance that it was fitted accidentally by errors in data  Therefore, one should include model complexity when evaluating a model
  • 62. Minimum Description Length (MDL)  Cost(Model,Data) = Cost(Data|Model) + Cost(Model)  Cost is the number of bits needed for encoding.  Search for the least costly model.  Cost(Data|Model) encodes the misclassification errors.  Cost(Model) uses node encoding (number of children) plus splitting condition encoding. A B A? B? C? 1 0 0 1 Yes No B1 B2 C1 C2 X y X1 1 X2 0 X3 0 X4 1 … … Xn 1 X y X1 ? X2 ? X3 ? X4 ? … … Xn ?
  • 63. How to Address Overfitting  Pre-Pruning (Early Stopping Rule)  Stop the algorithm before it becomes a fully-grown tree  Typical stopping conditions for a node:  Stop if all instances belong to the same class  Stop if all the attribute values are the same  More restrictive conditions:  Stop if number of instances is less than some user-specified threshold  Stop if class distribution of instances are independent of the available features (e.g., using  2 test)  Stop if expanding the current node does not improve impurity measures (e.g., Gini or information gain).
  • 64. How to Address Overfitting…  Post-pruning  Grow decision tree to its entirety  Trim the nodes of the decision tree in a bottom-up fashion  If generalization error improves after trimming, replace sub-tree by a leaf node.  Class label of leaf node is determined from majority class of instances in the sub-tree  Can use MDL for post-pruning
  • 65. Example of Post-Pruning A? A1 A2 A3 A4 Class = Yes 20 Class = No 10 Error = 10/30 Training Error (Before splitting) = 10/30 Pessimistic error = (10 + 0.5)/30 = 10.5/30 Training Error (After splitting) = 9/30 Pessimistic error (After splitting) = (9 + 4  0.5)/30 = 11/30 PRUNE! Class = Yes 8 Class = No 4 Class = Yes 3 Class = No 4 Class = Yes 4 Class = No 1 Class = Yes 5 Class = No 1
  • 66. Examples of Post-pruning  Optimistic error?  Pessimistic error?  Reduced error pruning? C0: 11 C1: 3 C0: 2 C1: 4 C0: 14 C1: 3 C0: 2 C1: 2 Don’t prune for both cases Don’t prune case 1, prune case 2 Case 1: Case 2: Depends on validation set
  • 67. Handling Missing Attribute Values  Missing values affect decision tree construction in three different ways:  Affects how impurity measures are computed  Affects how to distribute instance with missing value to child nodes  Affects how a test instance with missing value is classified
  • 68. Computing Impurity Measure Tid Refund Marital Status Taxable Income Class 1 Yes Single 125K No 2 No Married 100K No 3 No Single 70K No 4 Yes Married 120K No 5 No Divorced 95K Yes 6 No Married 60K No 7 Yes Divorced 220K No 8 No Single 85K Yes 9 No Married 75K No 10 ? Single 90K Yes 10 Class = Yes Class = No Refund=Yes 0 3 Refund=No 2 4 Refund=? 1 0 Split on Refund: Entropy(Refund=Yes) = 0 Entropy(Refund=No) = -(2/6)log(2/6) – (4/6)log(4/6) = 0.9183 Entropy(Children) = 0.3 (0) + 0.6 (0.9183) = 0.551 Gain = 0.9  (0.8813 – 0.551) = 0.3303 Missing value Before Splitting: Entropy(Parent) = -0.3 log(0.3)-(0.7)log(0.7) = 0.8813
  • 69. Distribute Instances Tid Refund Marital Status Taxable Income Class 1 Yes Single 125K No 2 No Married 100K No 3 No Single 70K No 4 Yes Married 120K No 5 No Divorced 95K Yes 6 No Married 60K No 7 Yes Divorced 220K No 8 No Single 85K Yes 9 No Married 75K No 10 Refund Yes No Class=Yes 0 Class=No 3 Cheat=Yes 2 Cheat=No 4 Refund Yes Tid Refund Marital Status Taxable Income Class 10 ? Single 90K Yes 10 No Class=Yes 2 + 6/9 Class=No 4 Probability that Refund=Yes is 3/9 Probability that Refund=No is 6/9 Assign record to the left child with weight = 3/9 and to the right child with weight = 6/9 Class=Yes 0 + 3/9 Class=No 3
  • 70. Classify Instances Refund MarSt TaxInc YES NO NO NO Yes No Married Single, Divorced < 80K > 80K Married Single Divorce d Total Class=No 3 1 0 4 Class=Yes 6/9 1 1 2.67 Total 3.67 2 1 6.67 Tid Refund Marital Status Taxable Income Class 11 No ? 85K ? 10 New record: Probability that Marital Status = Married is 3.67/6.67 Probability that Marital Status ={Single,Divorced} is 3/6.67
  • 71. Scalable Decision Tree Induction Methods  SLIQ (EDBT’96 — Mehta et al.)  Builds an index for each attribute and only class list and the current attribute list reside in memory  SPRINT (VLDB’96 — J. Shafer et al.)  Constructs an attribute list data structure  PUBLIC (VLDB’98 — Rastogi & Shim)  Integrates tree splitting and tree pruning: stop growing the tree earlier  RainForest (VLDB’98 — Gehrke, Ramakrishnan & Ganti)  Builds an AVC-list (attribute, value, class label)  BOAT (PODS’99 — Gehrke, Ganti, Ramakrishnan & Loh)  Uses bootstrapping to create several small samples
  翻译: