Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

Comparative Study of Web 1.0,
Web 2.0 and Web 3.0
by
UMESHA NAIK
Lecturer
Department of Library and Information Science
Mangalore University
Mangalagangothri 574 199
umeshai@yahoo.com
and
D. SHIVALINGAIAH
Professor
Department of Library and Information Science
Mangalore University
Mangalagangothri 574 199
d_shivaling@yahoo.com

Introduction
Application Programming Interface
User views web pages
1989 - Sir Tim Berners-Lee,
Web 1.0 - Netscape
Web 2.0 – It is not the software that
enables the web
Web 3.0 - more intelligent and
microcontent

Web 1.0
First implementation of the web
Small number of writers and large
number of User / readers
Hypertext documents accessed via the
Internet.
Berners-Lee - read-only web

Web 2.0
Read-write
Berners-Lee's method
Technologies such as weblogs (blogs),
social book marking, wikis, podcasts, RSS
feeds. social software, web APIs, and online
web services- eBay and Gmail.
Tim O’Reilly popularized web 2.0
web 2.0 services are expected to replace
desktop computing applications for many
purposes

Web 2.0 Website Types  Audio
 BlogPod
 Blogging
 Book marking
 Calendars
 Chats
 Collaboration
 Communication
 Community
 CRM (Customer Relationship Management)
 E-commerce
 E-learning
 E-mail
 Filesharing
 Forums
 Games
 Images
 Knowledge Base
 Lists
 Mapping
 Mashups
 Multi-media
 Portals
 RSS (Rich Site Summary)
 Wiki

Web 3.0
 Read-write-execute
 Web into a database
 High quality content & services produced
 Multiple non-browser applications
 Artificial intelligence technologies
 The Semantic web, the Geospatial Web, or
the 3D web
 Tim Berners-Lee coined Giant Global
Graph (GGG) as another facet of Web 3.0

Web 2.0 based websites
 Flickr
 Orkut
 YouTube
 Blogs
 Google AD sense
 Wikipedia
 Scribd

Comparison between web 1.0,
web 2.0 and web 3.0

Web 1.0 Web 2.0 Web 3.0
1996 2006 2016
The Web The Social Web The Semantic Web
Tim Berners
Lee
Tim O'Reilly Sir Tim Berners Lee
Read only web Read and write
web
Read, write and
execute web
Information
sharing
Interaction Immersion.

Million of users Billion of users Trillion of users
Ecosystem Participation Understanding
itself
Connect
information
Connect people Connect
knowledge
Brain and Eyes
(= Information)
Brain, Eyes, Ears,
Voice and Heart
(= Passion)
Brain, Eyes, Ears,
Voice, Heart,
Arms and Legs
(= Freedom
The
Hypertext/CGI
Web. (the
basics)
The Community
Web (for people:
apps/sites
connecting them).
The Semantic
Web (for
machines).

Companies
publish
content
that people
consume
(e.g. CNN)
People publish
content that other
people can
consume,
companies build
platforms that let
people publish
content for other
people (e.g. Flickr,
YouTube, Adsense,
Wikipedia,
Blogger, MySpace,
RSS, Digg)
People build
applications that
other people can
interact with,
companies build
platforms that let
people publish
services by
leveraging the
associations between
people or special
content (e.g.
FaceBook, Google
Maps, My Yahoo!)

Pushed web,
text/graphics
based flash
Two way web
pages, Wikis,
video, pod casts,
shading,
Personal
publishing, 2D
portals
3D portals, avtar
representation,
Interoperable profits,
multi-user virtual
environment
(MUVEs), Integrated
games, education and
business, all media
flows in and out of
virtualWeb worlds

Companies
publish
content that
people
consume (e.g.
CNN)
People publish
content that other
people can
consume,
companies build
platforms that let
people publish
content for other
people (e.g. Flickr,
YouTube, Adsense,
Wikipedia, Blogger,
MySpace, RSS,
Digg)
People build
applications that
other people can
interact with,
companies build
platforms that let
people publish
services (e.g.
FaceBook,
Google Maps,
My Yahoo!)

SE retrieve macro
contents. Search
is very fast but
many times
results are
inaccurate or
more than users
can chew.
SE retrieve tags
with micro
contents. Tags
everything:
pictures, links,
events, news,
Blogs, audio,
video, and so on.
Google Base
even retrieves
micro content
texts.
SE will
hopefully
retrieve micro
content texts
which were
tagged
automatically.
Billions of
Web 1.0 macro
contents into
micro contents.

Web 1.0 was all
about static
content, one
way publishing
of content
without any real
interaction
between readers
or publishers or
each other.
Web 2.0 is more
about 2 way
communication
through social
networking,
blogging, wikis,
tagging, user
generated content
and video.
Web 3.0 is
curiusly
undefined. AI and
the web learning
what you want
and delivering
you a
personalized web
experience.

The web in the
beginning when
it was first
developing web
1.0
New advances
that allow a much
more
sophisticated user
interaction with
web pages –
citizen
journalism, social
networks and
Wikis are all
products of Web
2.0
Thought to be the
future - where the
web is more
interactive with
users, leading to a
kind of artificial
intelligence web
3.0

Personal web
sites
Blogs Semantic Blogs:
SemiBlog, Haystack,
Semblog, Structured
Blogging
Content
Management
system
Wikis,
Wikipedia
Semantic Wikis:
Semantic MediaWiki,
SemperWiki, Platypus,
dbpedia, Rhizome
AltaVista,
Google
Google
personalized,
DumpFind,
Hakia
Semantic Search:
SWSE, Swoogle,
Intellidimension
(Search Engine for SemanticWeb)

Citeseer,
Project
Gutenberg
Google
scholar, Book
search
Semantic Digital
Libraries: JeromDl,
BRICKS, Longwell
(Building Resources for Integrated
Cultural Knowledge Services)
Message
boards
Community
portals
Semantic Forums and
community portals:
SIOC, OpenLink
DataSpaces
(Semantically-Interlinked Online
Communities)
Buddy Lists,
Address book
Online social
networks
Semantic Social
Networks: FOAF,
(Friend of a friend)
People Aggregator

Conclusion
Web offers so many opportunities
Semantic Web (Web 3.0) promises to
“organize the world’s information”
Web 2.0 are far-reaching- socially, culturally,
and even politically.
Designers and developers
Different forms of language

Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3

Similar to Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3 (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Comparative study of web 1, Web 2 and Web 3