The document lists differences between the 13 colonies grouped into New England, Middle, and Southern regions. It describes differences in their geography, governments, major industries, and crops. The New England colonies had forests and poor soil, governments that separated church and state, shipbuilding and fishing industries, and grew grains. The Middle colonies had more fertile land and rivers, elected lawmakers, farming and milling, and primarily wheat. The Southern colonies focused on cash crops like tobacco and rice, tied work to receiving food, and benefited from navigable rivers.
The document provides information about life in the New England, Middle, and Southern colonies. It describes their economies, which focused on farming, fishing, and cash crops like tobacco. Religion played a central role, with the Puritans in New England leading strict lives centered around church. Education emphasized reading the Bible. People ate locally grown and hunted food and wore simple homemade clothes. The colonies practiced self-government through assemblies and traded goods with Native Americans and each other.
This document provides a summary of the 13 original colonies of British America in 3 sentences or less per section:
- It divides the colonies into 3 geographic regions: New England (4 colonies), Middle (4 colonies), and Southern (5 colonies) and summarizes the economy, climate, resources, and population of each region.
- It then provides 1-2 paragraphs on each individual colony, summarizing their founding date and people, economy, resources, and religion.
- Additional sections summarize the economies, climates, resources, populations, and religions of the colonies overall.
The document discusses various black-box testing techniques. It introduces testing, verification, and validation. It then describes black-box and white-box testing. Various types of testing like unit, integration, functional, system, acceptance, regression, and beta testing are explained. Strategies for writing test cases like equivalence partitioning and boundary value analysis are provided. The document emphasizes the importance of planning testing early in the development process.
The document lists differences between the 13 colonies grouped into New England, Middle, and Southern regions. It describes differences in their geography, governments, major industries, and crops. The New England colonies had forests and poor soil, governments that separated church and state, shipbuilding and fishing industries, and grew grains. The Middle colonies had more fertile land and rivers, elected lawmakers, farming and milling, and primarily wheat. The Southern colonies focused on cash crops like tobacco and rice, tied work to receiving food, and benefited from navigable rivers.
The document provides information about life in the New England, Middle, and Southern colonies. It describes their economies, which focused on farming, fishing, and cash crops like tobacco. Religion played a central role, with the Puritans in New England leading strict lives centered around church. Education emphasized reading the Bible. People ate locally grown and hunted food and wore simple homemade clothes. The colonies practiced self-government through assemblies and traded goods with Native Americans and each other.
This document provides a summary of the 13 original colonies of British America in 3 sentences or less per section:
- It divides the colonies into 3 geographic regions: New England (4 colonies), Middle (4 colonies), and Southern (5 colonies) and summarizes the economy, climate, resources, and population of each region.
- It then provides 1-2 paragraphs on each individual colony, summarizing their founding date and people, economy, resources, and religion.
- Additional sections summarize the economies, climates, resources, populations, and religions of the colonies overall.
The document discusses various black-box testing techniques. It introduces testing, verification, and validation. It then describes black-box and white-box testing. Various types of testing like unit, integration, functional, system, acceptance, regression, and beta testing are explained. Strategies for writing test cases like equivalence partitioning and boundary value analysis are provided. The document emphasizes the importance of planning testing early in the development process.
This paper presents comparison study among three
of the most famous Business Process Management
Systems, Bizagi, ProcessMaker, and Joget. Bizagi is
close source, while ProcessMaker and Joget are open
source. The comparison framework has been devel-
oped based on the most features that needed to be in-
teracted when developing work
ow system. Simple
business process has been used as case study that de-
scribes the online application for master applicants
at modern Arab university. Systems have been devel-
oped using those tools. After that the comparison was
done according to the framework. Finally the results
are pointing according the given measurement.
According to our framework and selected features the
study found that the Bizagi has the best performance
and the second is ProcessMaker. However, this by no
means is a complete comparison.
In business process modelling Bizagi outperforms the
other tools. However in form aspects ProcessMaker
and Joget outperform Bizagi.
This paper presents comparison study among three
of the most famous Business Process Management
Systems, Bizagi, ProcessMaker, and Joget. Bizagi is
close source, while ProcessMaker and Joget are open
source. The comparison framework has been devel-
oped based on the most features that needed to be in-
teracted when developing work
ow system. Simple
business process has been used as case study that de-
scribes the online application for master applicants
at modern Arab university. Systems have been devel-
oped using those tools. After that the comparison was
done according to the framework. Finally the results
are pointing according the given measurement.
According to our framework and selected features the
study found that the Bizagi has the best performance
and the second is ProcessMaker. However, this by no
means is a complete comparison.
In business process modelling Bizagi outperforms the
other tools. However in form aspects ProcessMaker
and Joget outperform Bizagi.
This thesis compares the workflow management systems BizAgi and Joget. It develops a framework to determine the more suitable system for a given project based on features like process modeling, monitoring, engine, and business activity monitoring. A case study of an online application process at Sudan University of Science and Technology is implemented in both tools. BizAgi is found to have stronger performance in most criteria based on a scoring system. While both tools excel at process modeling, BizAgi receives higher marks for its superior monitoring, business activity monitoring, and process engine capabilities.
This document outlines transaction concepts including properties, concurrency control, and recovery control. It discusses the ACID properties of transactions and techniques for concurrency control including locking and timestamping. It covers concurrency issues like lost updates, inconsistent analysis, and deadlocks. Recovery control techniques like logging and checkpoints are also summarized. Alternative models for long transactions like nested transactions, sagas, and workflow models are briefly outlined.
This document describes an experiment testing the performance of a main-memory database using physical memory as primary storage and disk as backup. Various tests were run involving 1,000 transactions across 80 database extents, with the transactions consisting of either 1 operation or 1-5 operations. The tests varied the percentage of updates versus queries from 0% to 98% updates. Metrics like transaction throughput, wait times, and deadlocks were measured. The results showed transaction waits and deadlocks increased with higher percentages of updates, while throughput was promising at over 200 transactions per second for single-operation transactions.
This document discusses embedded systems and provides examples of their applications. It defines embedded systems as a combination of computer hardware, software, and other mechanical parts designed to perform a specific function. Examples of embedded system applications include smart video games, vending machines, smart cards, home appliances, network systems, and more. The document then covers embedded system design, key properties of embedded software, and common application areas such as ATMs, engine management, business machines, consumer electronics, and more. It concludes that embedded systems have become vital components of many larger systems and their use will continue increasing rapidly.
Sudan University of science and Technology College of graduate studies College of Computer Science and Information Technology Msc in Computer Science – Software Engineering Track
This document discusses web servers. It provides an overview of web clients and web servers, and describes how web servers handle static and dynamic content. The document outlines the typical architecture of a two-tier or three-tier client-server system for delivering web pages. It also discusses the GET and POST request methods, phases of request handling, popular web servers like Apache and IIS, and factors to consider when selecting a web server.
1. Requirements engineering is concerned with identifying user needs and communicating the purpose and context of a software system.
2. There are different levels and types of requirements including business, user, and system requirements. Good requirements are unitary, complete, consistent, unambiguous, and verifiable.
3. The requirements engineering process includes elicitation, analysis, specification, verification and documentation according to standards. Effective requirements engineering is critical for project success.
The document describes an online application management system for a master's program. It includes use case diagrams, sequence diagrams, a class diagram, and workflow diagram to visualize the system. The system allows applicants to apply online, an admissions department to review applications, and a college to make decisions. It aims to reduce delays and costs compared to traditional paper-based systems. Key users are applicants, admissions, college administrators, and a system administrator.
This document discusses the state of the art in distributed database security over several decades. It covers topics like multilevel security approaches from the 1980s using distributed data/centralized control. Later sections discuss the inference problem, Hippocratic databases in the 1990s-2000s, trusted mediators, blind comparers, and improving blind comparers with fake queries and declassification. Federated database security is also covered, focusing on access control, identity management and authorization. Integrated distributed database security research from the late 1990s onward integrating policies is summarized as well.
More Related Content
More from Mohamed Zeinelabdeen Abdelgader Farh jber
This paper presents comparison study among three
of the most famous Business Process Management
Systems, Bizagi, ProcessMaker, and Joget. Bizagi is
close source, while ProcessMaker and Joget are open
source. The comparison framework has been devel-
oped based on the most features that needed to be in-
teracted when developing work
ow system. Simple
business process has been used as case study that de-
scribes the online application for master applicants
at modern Arab university. Systems have been devel-
oped using those tools. After that the comparison was
done according to the framework. Finally the results
are pointing according the given measurement.
According to our framework and selected features the
study found that the Bizagi has the best performance
and the second is ProcessMaker. However, this by no
means is a complete comparison.
In business process modelling Bizagi outperforms the
other tools. However in form aspects ProcessMaker
and Joget outperform Bizagi.
This paper presents comparison study among three
of the most famous Business Process Management
Systems, Bizagi, ProcessMaker, and Joget. Bizagi is
close source, while ProcessMaker and Joget are open
source. The comparison framework has been devel-
oped based on the most features that needed to be in-
teracted when developing work
ow system. Simple
business process has been used as case study that de-
scribes the online application for master applicants
at modern Arab university. Systems have been devel-
oped using those tools. After that the comparison was
done according to the framework. Finally the results
are pointing according the given measurement.
According to our framework and selected features the
study found that the Bizagi has the best performance
and the second is ProcessMaker. However, this by no
means is a complete comparison.
In business process modelling Bizagi outperforms the
other tools. However in form aspects ProcessMaker
and Joget outperform Bizagi.
This thesis compares the workflow management systems BizAgi and Joget. It develops a framework to determine the more suitable system for a given project based on features like process modeling, monitoring, engine, and business activity monitoring. A case study of an online application process at Sudan University of Science and Technology is implemented in both tools. BizAgi is found to have stronger performance in most criteria based on a scoring system. While both tools excel at process modeling, BizAgi receives higher marks for its superior monitoring, business activity monitoring, and process engine capabilities.
This document outlines transaction concepts including properties, concurrency control, and recovery control. It discusses the ACID properties of transactions and techniques for concurrency control including locking and timestamping. It covers concurrency issues like lost updates, inconsistent analysis, and deadlocks. Recovery control techniques like logging and checkpoints are also summarized. Alternative models for long transactions like nested transactions, sagas, and workflow models are briefly outlined.
This document describes an experiment testing the performance of a main-memory database using physical memory as primary storage and disk as backup. Various tests were run involving 1,000 transactions across 80 database extents, with the transactions consisting of either 1 operation or 1-5 operations. The tests varied the percentage of updates versus queries from 0% to 98% updates. Metrics like transaction throughput, wait times, and deadlocks were measured. The results showed transaction waits and deadlocks increased with higher percentages of updates, while throughput was promising at over 200 transactions per second for single-operation transactions.
This document discusses embedded systems and provides examples of their applications. It defines embedded systems as a combination of computer hardware, software, and other mechanical parts designed to perform a specific function. Examples of embedded system applications include smart video games, vending machines, smart cards, home appliances, network systems, and more. The document then covers embedded system design, key properties of embedded software, and common application areas such as ATMs, engine management, business machines, consumer electronics, and more. It concludes that embedded systems have become vital components of many larger systems and their use will continue increasing rapidly.
Sudan University of science and Technology College of graduate studies College of Computer Science and Information Technology Msc in Computer Science – Software Engineering Track
This document discusses web servers. It provides an overview of web clients and web servers, and describes how web servers handle static and dynamic content. The document outlines the typical architecture of a two-tier or three-tier client-server system for delivering web pages. It also discusses the GET and POST request methods, phases of request handling, popular web servers like Apache and IIS, and factors to consider when selecting a web server.
1. Requirements engineering is concerned with identifying user needs and communicating the purpose and context of a software system.
2. There are different levels and types of requirements including business, user, and system requirements. Good requirements are unitary, complete, consistent, unambiguous, and verifiable.
3. The requirements engineering process includes elicitation, analysis, specification, verification and documentation according to standards. Effective requirements engineering is critical for project success.
The document describes an online application management system for a master's program. It includes use case diagrams, sequence diagrams, a class diagram, and workflow diagram to visualize the system. The system allows applicants to apply online, an admissions department to review applications, and a college to make decisions. It aims to reduce delays and costs compared to traditional paper-based systems. Key users are applicants, admissions, college administrators, and a system administrator.
This document discusses the state of the art in distributed database security over several decades. It covers topics like multilevel security approaches from the 1980s using distributed data/centralized control. Later sections discuss the inference problem, Hippocratic databases in the 1990s-2000s, trusted mediators, blind comparers, and improving blind comparers with fake queries and declassification. Federated database security is also covered, focusing on access control, identity management and authorization. Integrated distributed database security research from the late 1990s onward integrating policies is summarized as well.
More from Mohamed Zeinelabdeen Abdelgader Farh jber (11)