Article leadership that_gets_results human capital

leadership
Vol 10 Issue 4
32
Leadership that
Gets Results:
Sattar Bawany, Managing Director & Country Head, Singapore
& Head of Transition Coaching Practice, DBM Asia Pacific
Impact and Measurement of Emotional
Intelligence on Leadership Effectiveness

leadership
Vol 10 Issue 4
33
The New Realities
Leadership is something that may not necessarily be tailor-made
for everyone today. Much has to do with self-confidence and
the ability to believe in oneself before one can motivate others
and elicit their respect. Hence, there are a chosen few who are
able to lead and approach each undertaking with confidence
and achieve the desired results.
In the early years of leadership studies, the so-called ‘trait
theory’ took the view that there is a set of traits that separates
the leader from the pack. Traits claiming to be characteristic
of leaders included intelligence, a drive to dominate others,
being extroverted and having charisma. Today, people often
point to the importance of emotional intelligence in achieving
leadership effectiveness.
What is Emotional Intelligence?
The most widely accepted model of emotional intelligence
(EI) has been influenced by several scientists and researchers.
Sternberg’s (2003) theory of multiple intelligences suggests
that interpersonal and intrapersonal intelligence are unique,
and different from the mathematical and logical type
recognised today as ‘IQ’, or general intelligence. Peter Salovey
and John Mayer first proposed their own theory of EI in 1990
and Reuven Bar-On (1988) has placed EI in the context of
personality, health and well-being.
With his 1995 mega best-seller Emotional Intelligence:
Why It Can Matter More Than IQ, Daniel Goleman brought
to prominence the notion of emotional intelligence and
‘emotional quotient’ (EQ) as an alternative to the more
traditional measures of IQ. Goleman (1998) reformulated EI
in terms of a theory of organisational and job performance.
According to Goleman (2000), ‘a leader’s singular job is to get
results’. But even with all the leadership training programs and
‘expert’ advice available, effective leadership still eludes many
people and organisations. One reason, says Goleman, is that
such experts offer advice based on inference, experience and
instinct, not on quantitative data.
The discussion of EQ often begins with an emotional
challenge from Aristotle:
‘Anyone can become angry–that is easy. But to be angry with
the right person, to the right degree, at the right time, for the
right purpose, and in the right way–that is not easy’.
Typically, everyone involved gets anxious, frustrated,
worried and even angry at times. It’s bad enough to feel these
emotions, but brain researchers have recently found that
experiencing them actually inhibits cognitive function. It’s
called cortical inhibition, or ‘amygdala hijack’, as Goleman
terms it. So the old saying ‘I was so upset I couldn’t think
straight’ is actually true. Think about the last time you got mad
at yourself for hitting a bad golf shot. What typically happens
to your performance after that? It gets worse. When you
experience negative emotions, you are not as likely to make the
best decisions.
The Consortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence
in organisations (www.eiconsortium.org) is a useful website
that serves as a resource portal on the topic of emotional
intelligence, including information on measures, current
findings and EI resources.
Emotional Intelligence and Leadership
Effectiveness
Studies have demonstrated that leaders who consistently
outperform their peers not only have the technical skills
required, but more importantly, have mastered most of the
aspects of Emotional Intelligence. In the Harvard Business
Review landmark article ‘What Makes a Leader?’, Goleman
(1998) states that the five components of Emotional Intelligence
at Work are: Self-Awareness, Self-Regulation (or Management),
Motivation, Empathy (Social Awareness), and Social Skills
(Relationship Management).
There is growing evidence that the range of abilities that
constitute what is now commonly known as emotional
intelligence plays a key role in determining success, both in
one’s personal life and in the workplace. Research by Ruderman
et. al (2001) has uncovered links between specific elements of
emotional intelligence and specific behaviors associated with
leadership effectiveness and ineffectiveness. The study using
BarOn EQ-i® (Emotional Quotient Inventory) –an assessment
“Leadership is a journey that requires
investments of time and reflection, not
something that can be learned in a
five-day training course.”

leadership
Vol 10 Issue 4
34
of emotional intelligence–found that higher levels of particular
emotional intelligence components appear to be connected to
better performance. The study also identified potential problem
areas that could contribute to executive derailment.
Measurement of Emotional Intelligence
Using BarOn EQ-i® (Emotional Quotient Inventory) and
BarOn-360® Multi-rater Assessment
The development of the BarOn® model of emotional
intelligence evolved from Dr. Reuven Bar-On’s early clinical
experiences. Based on these experiences, he asked the
question: ‘Why are some individuals more able to succeed in
life than others?’ After a thorough review of the factors thought
to determine success in general, Bar-On (1988) found that
predicting success is not always based on cognitive intelligence.
Many cognitively intelligent people flounder in life, while many
less cognitively intelligent individuals succeed and prosper.
Emotional intelligence addresses the emotional, personal,
social and survival dimensions of intelligence, which are often
more important to successful coping with environmental
demands and pressures than the more traditional cognitive
aspects of intelligence. In everyday language, emotional
intelligence is referred to as ‘street smarts’ or ‘common sense’
(Stein & Book, 2003). Emotional intelligence competencies
can be improved through training, and thus provide an
excellent means of identifying potential areas for improvement,
as well as measuring the effectiveness of individual and
organisational development programs. Studies indicate that
emotional intelligence accounts for 15–45% of work success,
whereas cognitive intelligence has shown low and insignificant
correlations with performance in the workplace (Jae, J. H.,
1997). This means that the most intelligent or highly qualified
person for a position may not have the emotional constitution
to handle the stresses of the job environment.
BarOn Emotional Quotient Inventory (BarOn EQ-i®) (1997)
was the first scientifically validated instrument produced for
the purpose of assessing emotionally intelligent behavior.
BarOn EQ-i® was developed from the comprehensive
integration of theoretical knowledge and empirical
sophistication guided by state-of-the-art psychometric
methodology. Age- and gender-specific norms are available
based on a normative sample that exceeds 3,150. Development
of this instrument, following scientific methodology, ensures
that it assesses emotional intelligence in a dependable
and consistent manner. Without this careful attention to
development, obtained scores could not be compared to a
yardstick, so they could not have relevance. If that were the
case, obtained scores would merely be numbers, and could
provide no useful information. It is a certainty that BarOn EQ-
i® has been well researched and developed in accordance with
the highest test development standards.
The BarOn EQ-i® identifies ‘people skills’ by measuring
leadership

leadership
Vol 10 Issue 4
35
Table 1 – The Factorial Components of BarOn’s® Concept of Emotional Intelligence
Self-Regard (SR) The ability to respect and accept yourself as basically good. Self-acceptance is the ability to accept your perceived
positive and negative aspects as well as limitations and possibilities.
Emotional Awareness (ES) The ability to recognise your feelings and to know why you are feeling a certain way.
Assertiveness (AS) The ability to express feelings, beliefs, and thoughts and defend one’s right in a non-destructive manner or
asserting your rights without threatening others.
Independence (IN) The ability to be self-reliant in your thinking and actions; to be free of emotional dependency.
Self-Actualization (SA) The ability to realise your potential capacities through involvement in pursuits that have meaning for you.
Empathy (EM) The ability to be aware of, to understand and to care about the feelings of others; to be able to read other people.
Social Responsibility (RE) The ability to be a cooperative, contributing, and constructive member of your social groups.
Interpersonal Relationship (IR) The ability to create and maintain mutually satisfying relationships that are characterised by intimacy and
affection.
Reality Testing (RT) The ability to see things as they are, rather than as we wish or fear them to be; to keep feelings from overwhelming
our perception of objective facts.
Flexibility (FL) The ability to adjust our emotions, thoughts, and behavior to changing situations and conditions.
Problem Solving (PS) The ability to methodically confront, identify and define problems as well as to generate and implement
potentially effective solutions.
Stress Tolerance (ST) The ability to handle bad events and stressful situations without ‘falling apart’; to manage through active and
positive coping techniques.
Impulse Control (IC) The ability to resist or delay an impulse or temptation to act; to be able to tolerate frustration without loss of control.
Optimism (OP) The ability to look at the brighter side of life and to maintain a positive attitude, even in the face of adversity; to
have hope.
Happiness (HA) The ability to feel satisfied with your present life; to enjoy yourself and others, and to have fun.
Adapted from Bar-On, R. (1997), ‘BarOn Emotional Quotient Inventory’, Technical Manual, Toronto, ON, Multi-Health Systems.
various aspects of social and emotional functioning. It is
the first fully validated and globally normed measure which
includes: intrapersonal, interpersonal, adaptability, stress
management and general mood. Table 1 outlines the 15
factors/sub-scales of EQ. The assessment demonstrates
excellent internal consistency and test-retest consistency.
Validity studies have shown the BarOn EQ-i® to possess factor
analytic criterion and solid predictive validity.
The BarOn EQ-360® (based on BarOn's EQ-i®) is
the emotional intelligence multi-rater of perceptions of
demonstrated EQ behaviours. When observer ratings are
compared with the results of a standard EQ-i self-report, a
more complete 360-degree profile emerges. While the EQ-i
identifies the level of a client’s emotional and social functioning
based on his or her responses, the EQ-360® assessment
provides a more in-depth analysis by having those who work
closely with the client provide information as well.
The EQ-360® is ideal for use in organisations where
developing effective communication between individuals,
teams, and the entire organisation is crucial to success. The
EQ-360® identifies both key leadership strengths that can
be leveraged to the benefit of the organisation, as well as
impediments getting in the way of high performance. The
assessment process can also be used as a follow-up to formal
coaching and to measure progress.

leadership
Vol 10 Issue 4
36
Effective Leadership Styles
Drawing on research of more than 3,000 executives, Goleman
(2000) explores which precise leadership behaviours yield positive
results. The findings were published in the Harvard Business
Review article ‘Leadership That Gets Results’. In that article he
outlines six distinct leadership styles, each one springing from
different components of emotional intelligence.
Each style has a distinct effect on the working atmosphere
of a company, division or team, and, in turn, on its financial
performance. The styles, by name and brief description alone, will
resonate with anyone who leads, is led, or as is the case with most of
us, does both. Commanding leaders demand immediate compliance.
Visionary leaders mobilise people towards a vision. Participative
leaders create emotional bonds and harmony. Democratic leaders
Some people have one style of leadership, which is fine if they
can find a situation that requires that particular style of leadership.
Having said that, the autocratic style of leadership is the least
successful. It would be a good idea to develop a more involving style
that gives you the benefit of exchange with and commitment from
the people around you. If you have not learnt the skills of working
cooperatively with others in ways that allow them to see you as a
leader, then learn those skills. If you find yourself dictating direction
to people who regularly resist your well-intentioned efforts, then
learn more participatory skills. When you have the skills, you can
call on them. Without them, you are stuck with doing what you have
done in the past, and you will achieve similar results.
Flexible leadership, however, involves being able to adapt your
leadership style according to the situation and the state of the
36
build consensus through participation. Pacesetting leaders expect
excellence and self-direction. And coaching leaders develop people
for the future.
Since leaders lead people, the style with which you do it is
important. It must truly represent you, fit with the situation, the
results you wish to achieve and the people you hope will follow your
lead. In truth, having a particular style is not as essential to being
a leader as having a vision of what could exist, being committed to
the vision, bringing great energy to realising that vision and having
people to support you.
team, e.g., taking charge when a team is forming, but playing the
role of coach when a team is managing itself well.
The fact that leadership qualities are dependent on context is
demonstrated in the film ‘Twelve O’Clock High’. In this 1949
film, a squadron starts to suffer increasing losses during the war;
the leader’s people-oriented approach starts to fail. He is replaced
by a dictatorial bully who turns the squadron around and restores
their pride. (In a modern setting, such leadership behaviour
would often be regarded as unacceptable, but it worked within the
group’s drastic situation.)

leadership
Vol 10 Issue 4
37
Article by Prof Sattar Bawany, Managing Director & Country Head, Singapore and Head of Transition Coaching Practice, DBM Asia Pacific. He is
also the Adjunct Professor of Strategy of Paris Graduate School of Management. DBM is a leading global human capital management firm providing
career transition, change management and talent development solutions including strategic leadership development and executive coaching services
to private and public companies, not-for-profits and governments. Website: www.dbm.com, Email: sbawany@dbm.com . DBM is organizing a series
of Networking and Professional Development Briefings exclusively for HR & OD Practitioners. For details on his upcoming workshop, please refer to
page 66. Please email Annie Lui at: <alui@dbm.com> for further details and registration.
References
Bar-On, R. (1988). The development of an operational concept of psychological well
being. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rhodes University, South Africa.
Bar-On, R. (1997). ‘BarOn Emotional Quotient Inventory, Technical Manual.
Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems Inc.
Goleman, D. (1998). ‘What makes a Leader?’ Harvard Business Review, November–
December.
Goleman, D. (2000). ‘Leadership that Gets Results’. Harvard Business Review, March-April.
Jae, J. H. (1997). Emotional Intelligence and Cognitive Ability as Predictors of Job
Performance in the Banking Sector. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Ateneo de Manila
University, Manila, Philippines.
Ruderman, M. N., Hannum, K., Leslie, J. B., & Steed, J. L. (2001). Leadership Skills
and Emotional Intelligence. Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, NC.
Stein, S. J. & Book, H. E. (2003). The EQ Edge: Emotional Intelligence and your
Success. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems Inc.
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). ‘A Broad View of Intelligence: The Theory of Successful
Intelligence.’ Consulting Psychology Journal, 55, 139–154.
Conclusion
Organisations need leaders to visualise the future, motivate and
inspire employees, and adapt to changing needs. DBM research
indicates that with the right leadership, development support–
including executive coaching–those individuals with leadership
potential can be developed into outstanding leaders. Emotional
Intelligence competencies are perhaps the most challenging for
leaders to build up effectively, and yet it is the one that often has
the most impact. As emotionally intelligent leaders rise through
the ranks of an organisation, their profile becomes more visible
to employees, and their increased power can have greater
impact.
In order for Singapore’s budding leaders to compete with
the world’s best, senior managers need to embrace the latest
techniques of human leadership development. The price of not
doing so will create plenty of managers, but very few leaders.
Finally, leadership is a journey that requires investments of time
and reflection, not something that can be learned in a five-day
training course.

Article leadership that_gets_results human capital

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (19)

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (10)

Similar to Article leadership that_gets_results human capital

Similar to Article leadership that_gets_results human capital (17)

More from Centre for Executive Education

More from Centre for Executive Education (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Article leadership that_gets_results human capital